You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Middle East
Powell rejects Qurei's 'bi-national' threat
2004-01-09
US Secretary of State Colin Powell, responding to Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei's suggestion Thursday that the Palestinians could seek a bi-national state with Israel instead of an independent state, said the US remains committed to a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians.
"Oh, no! Really! Us Paleostinians would just love to form a state with you guys! We'd get along well! Just think of all we've been through together..."
Qurei was responding to Prime Minister Sharon's threat to unilaterally determine Israel's borders with the Palestinians should peace negotiations fail. Qurei, speaking to Reuters, also described Sharon's plan as an "apartheid solution."
Just think of it as negotiations without you guys taking part...
Powell said he believed Sharon's plan for unilateral disengagement, outlined last month, would not come to fruition if the Palestinians presented a reliable negotiating partner.
Which they haven't to date, have they?
Asked if he thought the idea of a bi-national state was viable, Powell told reporters at a news conference: "No, we're committed to a two-state solution. I believe that's the only solution that will work, a state for the Palestinian people called Palestine, and a Jewish state, the state of Israel which exists."
The bi-national route was also one of Muammar's maunderings last year...
"I don't believe that we can accept a situation that results in anything one might characterize as apartheid or bantuism," Powell added. "What we need right now is for the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority to get control of security forces and to use those forces and use the other tools available to him to put down terror and to put down violence. And if that happens and we see that kind of commitment, then I'm confident that we can move forward on the roadkill road map."
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#6  We've got to nip this "declare a one-state solution" gambit in the bud, pronto. Can you imagine if Mexico gets wind of this? We might end up having 60 states stretching down through Central America. That's too damn many stars on the flag. I refuse to memorize any additional state capitals (I still get the capitals of the Washington and Oregon mixed up.)
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-1-9 11:51:21 PM  

#5  It will be interesting to see what happens when Israel has its wall and says the paleos are not our problem. Its a mess and they have blown their only chance to get out of the mess - leveraging off Israel's success. Its a problem that no-one can fix and I doubt anyone will seriously try. The press and NGOs will leave cos it will be too dangerous, and then this will be the mother-of-all-failed-states. Then what? Either they are left to die like flies in their own mess or we will have a radical 21st century solution. I personally favour resettling them to Saudi Arabia, probably at gunpoint and SA picking up the tab.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-1-9 6:22:44 PM  

#4  the wall needs a moat with crocidiles and shit to eat up any thick witted palo's who cross it
Posted by: Jon Shep   2004-1-9 3:11:27 PM  

#3  I've always argued that Israel should unilaterally declare a Palestinian state. Tell them, here is your country, these are your borders, Yasser is your leader. Oh, and any Palestinian terror attack will be considered an Act of War, between two states.
Posted by: Swiggles   2004-1-9 12:28:04 PM  

#2  Fred, are we forgetting that the Paleos want ALL of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza? This is not news, only a repeat of an earlier demand. I like Sharon’s solution: Build a Wall/Declare a border. That would leave ALL the (PLO) players swinging in the wind. Of course it lead to a ?new? terror state in the middle east.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2004-1-9 11:55:24 AM  

#1  I ain't buying the 2 state/aparthied comparison.
How can it be aparthied if the Paleo's have thier own international borders?
How can it be aparthied if the Paleo's have thier own governent,independant of Israelie control?
Posted by: raptor   2004-1-9 7:30:12 AM  

00:00