You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Airlines' fears over marshals
2003-12-29
Airlines have expressed concern at the deployment of armed sky marshals on some British passenger planes.
"Eww! Sky marshals! Ucky, sweaty men!"
Their worries over the anti-terrorist initiative follows the strong opposition expressed by the pilots' union Balpa. "We have always said we have concerns about having armed people on aircraft," said a British Airways' spokeswoman.
I have concerns over people trying to fly airplanes full of screaming civilians into things that are also full of screaming civilians...
She said: "We feel it is best to have strong security on the ground and that is where the focus of attention should be. We have always been of the opinion that if it is not safe to fly then we will not fly."
"So obviously we don't need those... men... with their... guns."
Another airline spokesman said: "We have reservations about this."
"We can put it on standby, though..."
"If you bring arms on to a plane then you raise the level of danger. Introducing a weapon into a cabin could lead to that weapon being used against passengers."
"Those men with the turbans, rolling their eyes and skewering the stewardesses, they've paid for their tickets, too, y'know!"
"If the level of risk is so high that a sky marshal has to be deployed, then it would be easier to just not operate that particular flight."
"Since I have 20-20 foresight, and I'm a seventh son of a seventh son, I know how to make sure there aren't any Bad Guys on our flights."
Transport Secretary Alistair Darling, who first announced the plan a year ago, said pilots would be informed if there was a sky marshal on their flight. "The captain of the aircraft would know. For perfectly obvious reasons. He has got to fly the aircraft," he told the BBC. Mr Darling said that sky marshals would be the "last line of defence" and they were among a series of measures being put in place - including improved screening of passengers and baggage - to prevent hijackings.
No. Really? That's brilliant. I'd have used them as the first line of defense. Have them start shooting at the passengers, preferably in the boarding lounge. Any passengers that shoot back must be hijackers.
He went on: "It is someone who is there when people have got on to the plane and is intent on trying to take over that plane. It is one of the last lines of defence," he said. "Of course the best thing to do is to try to stop people getting on to the plane in the first place."
"You, there! With the ordnance! May I see your boarding pass, please?"
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#9  I hope they're not banking too much. There was a Frenchie prominent among the passengers who beat the crap out of Shoe Boy.
Posted by: Fred   2003-12-29 10:48:30 PM  

#8  Charles, in theory the air marshalls would have bullets designed so that they do not penetrate the cabin.

Flight 93 that crashed in Penn and the shoebomber flight showed that American passengers are no longer going to sit passively and allow a plane to be taken. Recent news indicates Al Queda is banking on the French to shut up and die though.
Posted by: ruprecht   2003-12-29 10:25:18 PM  

#7  I believe it was Moms Mabley (PBUH) who suggested in the middle of the Cuban hijacking era that if you wanted to be safe... carry your own grenade on board... theory being what are the odds of two grenades on one flight? I still can't refute the logic.
Posted by: Shipman   2003-12-29 5:42:49 PM  

#6  Well, we could just outfit all passengers with remote-controlled explosive decapitation collars...

You actually trust the airline crew to hit the button for the right collar? Guns also might puncture the cabin at 20,000 feet. I suggest giving everyone aboard a Bowie knife.
Posted by: Charles   2003-12-29 5:22:46 PM  

#5  Ah, how far the victors in the Battle of Britain have fallen.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-12-29 4:53:34 PM  

#4  What's with all this weak-kneed Pommie whining about armed sky marshals on flights? Seems to me that if safety is the paramount issue, they'd welcome this step.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-12-29 4:14:15 PM  

#3  Perhaps British Airways would prefer to simply forgo all flights to and from the US rather than allow the Sky Marshall's aboard. Works for me.
Posted by: ruprecht   2003-12-29 4:06:17 PM  

#2  Well, we could just outfit all passengers with remote-controlled explosive decapitation collars...

All part of the service.
Posted by: mojo   2003-12-29 3:58:22 PM  

#1  Archie Bunker had it right. Give everybody on the plane a gun.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-12-29 3:37:38 PM  

00:00