You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
CIA building case Anthrax attacks were international terror plot
2003-12-26
Hat tip to Drudge - Somebody tell the FBI guys watching Hatfill?
The CIA has been quietly building a case that the anthrax attacks of 2001 were in fact the result of an international terrorist plot.
I think we've remarked on that before...
U.S. officials with access to intelligence reports tell us the information showing a terrorist link to the anthrax-filled letters sent by mail in the weeks after the September 11 terrorist attacks is not conclusive. But it is persuasive. Asked to comment, a U.S. official said, "There is no evidence at this point to suggest a foreign terrorist link or connection. But the matter is still under investigation and we’re not ruling anything out."
Occam's razor still suggests to me that it's tied in with Qaeda.
Some officials think the intelligence is at least as valid as the FBI’s "mad scientist" theory, which has produced dead ends so far for the G-men after more than two years of investigation of Hatfill and nobody in a turban. This theory says a U.S. biological weapons scientist with access to highly refined anthrax powder stole some and used it to awaken the U.S. government to the threat of deadly anthrax. Former weapons scientist Stephen Hatfill was identified by the Justice Department as a "person of interest" in the probe. Mr. Hatfill has stated repeatedly that he had nothing to do with the anthrax mailings. He is suing the federal government for investigating him.
and him alone
The deadly letters were sent to two U.S. senators and several news outlets in October and November 2001. They ended with the phrases, "death to America, death to Israel, Allah is great." Five persons were killed after inhaling anthrax spores and 22 others were sickened but survived. The spores were analyzed and found to be a virulent form known as the Ames strain. Also, the spores were milled into extremely fine powder, making it easier to disperse in the air. Investigators were hoping the Iraq Survey Group would come up with documents or evidence indicating that Iraq might have acquired the Ames strain. But U.S. officials said so far there are no signs of Ames-type anthrax in Iraq, either from samples or documents recovered from the Iraqi intelligence service. The service was in charge of weapons of mass destruction development.
I don't think it was Iraq. My guess is that the original source was Qaeda, with the starter samples originating in Kazakhstan. But it's just a guess, and I'm not an expert.
A report last month to the U.N. Security Council by its Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission concluded that traces of anthrax recovered from a bomb in early 2003 were of the same strain Iraq declared in 1991 it had weaponized. Those were not the Ames strain, U.S. officials said
Posted by:Frank G

#7  In case anyone's interested, way back in the day, John Ringo wrote an op-ed (that didn't get published) on the subject of the anthrax attacks, and why he didn't think they were of domestic origin. You can find it at http://johnringo.com/opstrange.htm. I would speculate on motives as to why they finally decided it's worthwhile to look at non-domestic sources, but I think I'll pass. Too many broken meters. Maybe I should get some of those wind-up ones from the C. Crane Catalog or something.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2003-12-26 5:44:42 PM  

#6  The CIA has been quietly building a case that the anthrax attacks of 2001 were in fact the result of an international terrorist plot.

Ah, hell. NOW my surprise meter's got smoke coming out of it. Who would have thought underflow would be that damaging?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-12-26 3:27:44 PM  

#5  For a sober look at the JFK case,I'll recommend Gerald Posner's Case Closed.It helped me reach two conclusions:1)Oswald did it.2)I was an idiot for believing a word Marrs,Summers,Stone,Garrison and the rest of the conspiracy theorists put out.
Posted by: El Id   2003-12-26 2:57:41 PM  

#4  This sounds like another competition between the CIA and FBI over who gets credit for solving the case. Even though they are now required to share information ( thanks to Bush after 9/11 ), it's still not enough to make them look at it. At this rate the Anthrax Case is going to be like the JFK mystery. If it's not already, which I think it is.
Posted by: Charles   2003-12-26 2:11:11 PM  

#3  Clint Van Zandt, former FBI profiler, at a conference I attended suggested two people, a scientist frustrated with the lack of preparedness of the U.S., and a child who did the actual writing. The "mad scientist" theory was bought into very early on by the FBI, with little or no evidence. Indeed, it is the sheer lack of evidence in any direction that is confounding this case. Bungled by the FBI? Oh, you bet!

The FBI's analysis of the Florida cases, Kathy Nguyen's death, Ottilie Lundgren's death, and baby at ABC are all questions that are unanswered. The latter three, with no other related cases, are unexplained.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2003-12-26 1:40:26 PM  

#2  "There is no evidence at this point to suggest a foreign terrorist link or connection".In other words,they're just as clueless as the FBI.Don't hold your breath,folks.
Posted by: El Id   2003-12-26 12:52:36 PM  

#1  Suggested Futures topics:

1) When will Hatfill sue the FBI? (over / under at 3 months)

2) How much will he win? (o/u = $3 m.)

3) Will Alan Dershowitz defend him? (10-1 odds)
Posted by: Raj   2003-12-26 12:48:24 PM  

00:00