You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
US swoops on al-Qaeda in Afghanistan
2003-12-09
The US military has launched its biggest ground offensive to date against Taliban and al-Qaeda remnants in Afghanistan, as reverberations from the weekend killing of nine children in an airstrike continued to cast a pall over the country’s efforts at recovery. A US military spokesman acknowledged that the attack on a remote village in the far south of Ghazni province may not have killed its intended target. Villagers have told US investigators that Mullah Wazir, a low-ranking local Taliban organiser, left the village 10 days before the strike, US spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Bryan Hilferty said at US headquarters in Bagram.
"I'm gettin' outta here. Let the kids take any heavy metal that comes this way..."
Hilferty said the strike was based on "very clear actionable intelligence" that Wazir, who US forces say was responsible for the October slaying of two Afghan road workers, was at home when the US warplanes planes struck. A team investigating the incident has gathered DNA from the site to try to establish the identity of an adult male killed in the attack, he said. Earlier, AFP reported that the US military said it has reason to believe the body was Wazir’s. "We have received corroborated intelligence that give us a very good indication that this was the person we were after, the intended target," US Central Command spokesman Pete Mitchell said.
"Ummm... Looks like him. He's got a turban and everything..."
But villagers have told reporters that the dead man was Abdul Hamid, a local resident aged in his 20s. Seven boys and two girls who had been playing nearby also were killed.
"Mom! We're gonna go over to Abdul Hamid's house and watch him roll his eyes and jump up and down!"
"Okay, kids. Watch out for A10s, though!"
Although the military has apologised for the deaths and promised to provide aid to help the village, the mistake has provoked widespread concern that the US military’s killing of civilians in airstrikes targeting terrorists could further alienate Afghans from the US-backed government of President Hamid Karzai, and the international recovery effort in Afghanistan.
Maybe the local Pashtuns should keep their kids away from mullahs?
Hilferty acknowledged the incident risked turning Afghans against the US-led coalition. "Such mistakes could make the Afghan people think ill of the coalition," he said.
Yeah. Dead kids do that. It also seems like every time there's a Taliban that gets banged, there's a passel of kids that check out, too. I'm wondering at that string of coincidences...
Meanwhile, the new offensive, code-named Operation Avalanche, is targeting areas in the south and east where a resurgent Taliban guerrilla force has been attacking humanitarian workers and government officials, placing a huge swath of the country off limits to international aid efforts. The operation involves 2,000 ground troops from the 11,500-strong US-led coalition force, making it the largest operation yet involving ground forces in Afghanistan. "This new operation will deny sanctuary to and disrupt the activities of terrorist forces simultaneously throughout the eastern, southeastern, and southern regions of Afghanistan in order to secure and stabilise the area, to set the conditions for reconstruction and political improvement, and to promote freedom of movement and commerce," a military statement said. The military refused to give further details, except to warn the operation would be bigger than any before. Despite repeated US operations against Taliban strongholds in recent months, the group seems to have been gaining in strength. Operation Avalanche takes over from Operation Mountain Resolve, which formally wound down at the weekend, the military said. That operation targeted the inaccessible, mountainous regions of Nuristan and Kunar in the northeast, a stronghold of Islamic militant leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and one of the areas where Osama bin Laden has most recently been rumoured to be hiding. The operation uncovered thousands of hidden weapons and ammunition rounds, but there were no reports that any wanted terrorist leaders were captured or killed.
Of course not. They left for Pakistan as soon as it started...
Six civilians died during the operation when a house was hit in an airstrike that was apparently based on faulty intelligence.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#8  "I can not understand why our infantry humps all that crap in the field. "

I don't know infantry, but I understand that some of the troops on the "snatch and grab" in Mogadishu treated the trip lightly and left their canteens and body armour at home.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-9 2:17:32 PM  

#7  Steve, the Canadians would point to the harsh Buffalo weather as the reason the invasion of Lower Canada failed in the War of 1812. Well, not really.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2003-12-9 1:21:25 PM  

#6  More on Operation Avalanche: Soldiers from the 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment stormed into an area east of Khost, a restive town along the border with Pakistan that has seen several recent attacks on coalition personnel, said Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, a U.S. military spokesman. "We came in with helicopters," he said of the maneuver, part of the newly launched Operation Avalanche. "We're trying to interdict along the border." U.S. and Afghan officials have long charged that Taliban rebels and their al-Qaida allies flee back across the mountainous border into Pakistan after launching attacks. Hilferty said the operation was designed to root out insurgents before the brutally cold winter months. "We're trying to get them before the winter sets in," he said. The 501st, based in Fort Richardson, Alaska, was on its first major deployment since arriving about two months ago.
"They are well-suited to working with the 10th Mountain Division here in the high mountains of Afghanistan," Hilferty said.

Ah, yes, the brutal Afghan winter. Let's check today's weather:
Kabul, Afghanistan - High 51, Low 29.
Ft. Richardson, Alaska - High 35, Low 25.
Buffalo, NY - High 44, Low 37.
Posted by: Steve   2003-12-9 12:35:38 PM  

#5  "US swoops on al Qaeda" -- swoops? Yeah, right. I saw some footage on TV last night. US soldiers struggling to cross a stream, waddling into helicopters with 80 lbs. of equipment on their backs. I can not understand why our infantry humps all that crap in the field. They can make about 2km per hour.
Posted by: Pete Stanley   2003-12-9 12:29:21 PM  

#4  I wonder, where did US intelligence get the information on the location of this Taliban operative. Is it just chance that the US is tipped off to the location of Mullah Wazir and attack while children are “playing” nearby?
Posted by: Dan Canaveral   2003-12-9 6:58:58 AM  

#3  American news agencies are presented with a quandry. Will be interesting to see whether total apathy toward events in Afghanistan outweighs a general predisposition towards running with stories that make the US look evil.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-9 4:45:17 AM  

#2  Hilferty acknowledged the incident risked turning Afghans against the US-led coalition.

"Such mistakes could make the Afghan people think ill of the coalition," he said.


Ya think?

Unfortunately such damage is sometimes unavoidable when the enemy hides behind civilians (and children).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2003-12-9 1:40:12 AM  

#1  
Hilferty acknowledged the incident risked turning Afghans against the US-led coalition.
Like the way they rose up in opposition to the far more heinous crimes against humanity perpetrated daily by the Taliban?

While a tragedy like this is awful, the success of the war does not hinge on it. Implying that it does just sounds like more leftist pessimism/panic.
Posted by: Islam Sucks   2003-12-9 1:25:58 AM  

00:00