You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
A new machine gun for GI Joe
2003-12-04
After 70 years of distinguished service, the U.S. Army is preparing to retire the M2HB .50-caliber machine guns. Replacing the M2 will be the lighter and more accurate XM312 .50 caliber (12.7 mm). The new weapon from General Dynamics, Falls Church, Va., is based on prototypes of the company’s XM307, a rapid-fire grenade launcher scheduled to see service in 2010. Changing only the barrel and five other parts converts the grenade launcher into a machine gun. But the Pentagon didn’t want soldiers to wait for a more accurate and stable weapon, so the Army is deploying XM312s two years from now.

The XM312 is a lightweight, low-recoil gun that mounts on vehicles and tripods and fires standard .50-caliber cartridges, including tracers, armor-piercing incendiaries, and sabot light-armor penatrators. Rounds feed from the left or right using the same deteriorating metal belt as the M2 uses.

The gun weighs just 43 lb, including tripod, much less than the Browning M2’s 128 lb, but still heavy enough to require a two-man team. Its peak firing rate is only 260 rounds/min, much less than the M2’s 600 rounds/min. The relatively slow rate of cyclic fire or peak firing rate makes the new weapon ineffective against fast-moving and airborne targets. But the XM312 should have a slightly higher practical rate of fire (the rate of fire a gun can sustain for an indefinite period without damage) than the M2’s 40 rounds/min. Range will also improve, going from the M2’s 1,500 to 2,000 m. A planned magnification and night-vision scope will let GIs take advantage of this longer range. EFL
Posted by:Chuck Simmins

#8  So their retiring the Ma Deuce huh? Great weapon, can actually use it for indirect fire to.
Posted by: Jarhead   2003-12-4 9:14:12 PM  

#7  The GAU-8 is bigger than a volkswagen bug, you're gonna need a hella big vehicle just to mount it let alone have it traverse and god I'd hate to imagine the vibration on that sucker.
Posted by: Val   2003-12-4 8:01:07 PM  

#6  OP: Your friend sounds like a real character. Not a lot of people would look at the A-10 and think, "Nice plane. Not enough guns."
Posted by: BH   2003-12-4 6:59:32 PM  

#5  I personally prefer the chassis-mounted Vulcan, with a couple of tubs of ammo and a full mix of rounds. Now THAT would provide "crowd control". Friend of mine wants to build a vehicle to mount the GAU-8 30mm cannon from the A-10. Says it will provide "added firepower" to the M1A1 and Bradley. Kinda sounds like overkill to me...
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-12-4 6:52:57 PM  

#4  Still, there was nothing like a quad-50 to cheer a body up.

Oh well, that's progress for ya..
Posted by: Michael   2003-12-4 6:30:12 PM  

#3  Still, there was nothing like a quad-50 to cheer a body up.

Oh well, that's progress for ya..
Posted by: Michael   2003-12-4 6:23:08 PM  

#2  43 lbs!?! Ye gods, man! That's great news! Now let's see what they can do with the Mk19.
Posted by: BH   2003-12-4 4:37:23 PM  

#1  A link to pictures & specs for the interested...
Posted by: snellenr   2003-12-4 3:51:12 PM  

00:00