You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US Planning More Mobile Iraq Force to Tackle Unrest
2003-11-29
The US military is restructuring its forces in Iraq to create a lighter, more mobile force with a bigger intelligence capability, better suited to the sort of low-level insurgency facing its troops, its top commander here said yesterday.
I understand that virtually all the troops in Iraq are doing the same quasi-infantry thing. F'rinstance, there aren't a lot of artillery fire missions, so ammo humpers are standing guard and going on patrol. Best to fix that...
As a major troop rotation sees the combat units and heavy amour that took part in the six-week spring invasion return home, Washington will deploy more infantry and lighter armored cars, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez said. “We are in fact going to change the composition of our forces to give us additional infantry,” the general told a Baghdad briefing. “We’re moving to a more mobile force, one that has the right blend of light and heavy. What we’re in search of is a very mobile, very flexible, lethal force that can accomplish its mission. Those terms are dictated by the enemy.”
Something we should probably look into is forming security battalions, similar to those the Sovs formed in Afghanistan — ours should be a bit more effective, of course. This isn't going to be the last reconstruction mission we see, and battalions made up of two comapnies of light infantry, one of MPs, and maybe one of intel makes more sense for that mission than tanks and artillery. And I hope the new force structure involves kill squads...
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#3  I think there are two tools that are needed: one for breaking an enemy force, the other for occupation. The one needs to be heavy on tanks and artillery, the other needs to be heavy on cops and guards.
Posted by: Fred   2003-11-30 9:54:02 AM  

#2  I have heard that Special Fores are the next step in Iraq. But the war on terror must not be bogged down in Iraq. Adapt and move on. Mopping up opperations in Iraq will take time but the war must move on.
Posted by: Lucky   2003-11-30 1:27:59 AM  

#1  Isn't this what Rumsfeld has been trying to do, and getting hammered by the tanker generals for? Like it or not, light infantry/recon, civil affairs/police, and intel is the way our forces are going to HAVE to fight for the foreseeable future. He cancelled that crusader lemon (which couldn't even deploy on a c17) and got the business for it. We're trying to turn heavy armored forces into infantry and cops in Iraq right now, and it's a huge pain in the ass.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-11-29 9:42:24 PM  

00:00