You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Attempt Underway to put the Prez Away
2003-11-19
Induhmedia: watch for BIAS! EFL. Hat tip LGF
CAMPAIGNERS READY TO GET BUSH SECTIONED UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT
Oh brother.
Press Release 2 ­ 18th November 2003 For immediate release
Armed with a doctor’s certificate, recommendations from two psychiatrists and a straight-jacket, a group of campaigners will attempt to get George W Bush sectioned under the Mental Health Act (1983) during his visit to Britain this week.
?Huh
Under the Act, a person is subject to compulsory admission for assessment in a mental institution if a doctor fears they are “likely to cause harm to themselves or others”.
Any doctor? Anywhere?
Using their knowledge of the system, the group composed of doctors, psychologists and mental health professionals will attempt to force an emergency section.
I don’t believe this.
An emergency admission for observation under Section 4 of the Act lasts for three days and can be sanctioned by one doctor. Admission under Section 2 can last for 28 days, whilst under Section 4 the patient can be detained for up to six months. The group behind this plan is he No Confidence Campaign, a non-aligned group of activists and health care professionals who were formed before the outbreak of war in an attempt to force a vote of no confidence in the Tony Blair’s leadership on the grounds of mental incapacity. They believe that President Bush’s mental stability also needs to be examined. His youthful penchant for sticking firecrackers in live frogs and his defence of the practice of branding fraternity pledges with heated coat hangers has been reported in the New York Times and concerns about his messianic style of leadership are widespread.
I've never heard either of those charges. Is there documentation? Googling "New York Times"+"George Bush"+firecracker doesn't turn it up.
Consultant psychiatrist Dr A Walker said today;
Okay, even if this was accurate, people change.
“In Mr Bush we see an individual who believes he has been chosen by god, who holds to certain beliefs regardless of logic or fact, and who demonstrates an inability to empathise. These are classic symptoms of someone suffering from psychotic grandiose delusions.”
Oh, he empathizes well, and is logical. Sorry, Induhmedia liars.

This is what used to be known as a publicity stunt. I fail to see how it makes these wienerheads look any brighter, even to each other.
Posted by:Atrus

#15  Who's putting who away here???
Posted by: tu3031   2003-11-19 11:18:41 PM  

#14  Anyone heard from Bulldog this morning?

Hi CS, I'm around. But not much to add to all the reports - speak for themselves really. Like yourself, I think the whole thing's been quite amusing so far. That may change tomorrow - there may yet be some serious civil disobedience. The poor attendance today is quite surprising - probably a combination of over-hyping and fair weather anti-Bush folk put off by the touted terrorist activity. Pretty ironic, really.
Posted by: Bulldog   2003-11-19 6:13:04 PM  

#13  I almost wish they were able to get around security (sounds like the brits don't take it too seriously anyway) and approach Dubya with that straight jacket. A few contusions and busted heads later, maybe a few reds would know better in the future.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-11-19 6:10:07 PM  

#12  So do I, and his name is Dr. A. Wan---uh---Walker.

Dr. A. Wanker. More fitting…
Posted by: Atrus   2003-11-19 3:47:29 PM  

#11  Andrei Sakharov and many other Soviet era dissidents would be familiar with this tactic. The moonbat authoritarians again show their true colors.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2003-11-19 1:04:37 PM  

#10  I personally would like to see them serve the papers with 250 Secret Service people around Bush. That would be a hoot! Can you just imagine the look on their faces?
Posted by: SamIII   2003-11-19 1:03:46 PM  

#9  non-aligned group of activists

Ah. Marxists.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-11-19 12:59:53 PM  

#8  ...we see an individual...who holds to certain beliefs regardless of logic or fact...

So do I, and his name is Dr. A. Wan---uh---Walker.

Physician, heal thyself.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2003-11-19 12:18:38 PM  

#7  the No Confidence Campaign, a non-aligned group of activists and health care professionals

Oh, non-aligned are they? I suspect that's true: their moral sense, intelligence and ethics are all clearly out of alignment.

Bah! Makes me a little sad to be a physician today.
Posted by: Steve White   2003-11-19 11:55:03 AM  

#6  Anyone heard from Bulldog this morning? I would be interested to hear his take on this. Me I think the whole thing is funny. I think the Bobbies should take a couple of whacks on these ‘Doctors’ heads and see if that cure them. Does anyone doubt that the patients now run the hospital?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2003-11-19 11:50:31 AM  

#5  Or an Old Testement Prophet chosen by God to smite the heathen.

Let the smiting continue!
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2003-11-19 11:20:01 AM  

#4  Any psychologist who attaches their name to this should lose their right to practice psychology. Clearly they are blinded by politics and unable to relate to the real world.
Posted by: Yank   2003-11-19 11:11:11 AM  

#3  who believes he has been chosen by god; classic symptoms of someone suffering from psychotic grandiose delusions
Sounds like some guy named Mohammad, me thinks. I wonder if these wankers are willing to take the logical step that all Muslims are nuts too?
Posted by: Spot   2003-11-19 11:06:33 AM  

#2  reported in the New York Times

The defense rests.
Posted by: Charles   2003-11-19 10:58:07 AM  

#1  Nice of them to demonstrate that the law needs an additional provision requiring that the petitioners must first prove that they're of sound mind...
Posted by: snellenr   2003-11-19 10:55:24 AM  

00:00