You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
The Dark Art of Interrogation
2003-11-15
EFL, but definitely worth the time

On what may or may not have been a Saturday, on what may have been March 1, in a house in this city that may have been this squat two-story white one belonging to Ahmad Abdul Qadoos, with big gray-headed crows barking in the front yard, the notorious terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was roughly awakened by a raiding party of Pakistani and American commandos. Anticipating a gunfight, they entered loud and fast. Instead they found him asleep. He was pulled from his bed, hooded, bound, hustled from the house, placed in a vehicle, and driven quickly away.

Here was the biggest catch yet in the war on terror. Sheikh Mohammed is considered the architect of two attempts on the World Trade Center: the one that failed, in 1993, and the one that succeeded so catastrophically, eight years later. He is also believed to have been behind the attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, and on the USS Cole two years later, and behind the slaughter last year of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, among other things. An intimate of Osama bin Laden’s, Sheikh Mohammed has been called the operations chief of al-Qaeda, if such a formal role can be said to exist in such an informal organization. Others have suggested that an apter designation might be al-Qaeda’s "chief franchisee." Whatever the analogy, he is one of the terror organization’s most important figures, a burly, distinctly modern, cosmopolitan thirty-seven-year-old man fanatically devoted to a medieval form of Islam. He was born to Pakistani parents, raised in Kuwait, and educated in North Carolina to be an engineer before he returned to the Middle East to build a career of bloody mayhem.

Some say that Sheikh Mohammed was captured months before the March 1 date announced by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Abdul Qadoos, a pale, white-bearded alderman in this well-heeled neighborhood, told me that Sheikh Mohammed was not there "then or ever." The official video of the takedown appears to have been faked. But the details are of minor importance. Whenever, wherever, and however it happened, nearly everyone now agrees that Sheikh Mohammed is in U.S. custody, and has been for some time...

Sheikh Mohammed is a smart man. There is an anxious, searching quality to his expression in that first post-arrest photo. It is the look of a man awakened into nightmare. Everything that has given his life meaning, his role as husband and father, his leadership, his stature, plans, and ambitions, is finished. His future is months, maybe years, of imprisonment and interrogation; a military tribunal; and almost certain execution. You can practically see the wheels turning in his head, processing his terminal predicament. How will he spend his last months and years? Will he maintain a dignified, defiant silence? Or will he succumb to his enemy and betray his friends, his cause, and his faith...

Isolated, confused, weary, hungry, frightened, and tormented, Sheikh Mohammed would gradually be reduced to a seething collection of simple needs, all of them controlled by his interrogators.

The key to filling all those needs would be the same: to talk...

e hear a lot these days about America’s over powering military technology; about the professionalism of its warriors; about the sophistication of its weaponry, eavesdropping, and telemetry; but right now the most vital weapon in its arsenal may well be the art of interrogation. To counter an enemy who relies on stealth and surprise, the most valuable tool is information, and often the only source of that information is the enemy himself. Men like Sheikh Mohammed who have been taken alive in this war are classic candidates for the most cunning practices of this dark art. Intellectual, sophisticated, deeply religious, and well trained, they present a perfect challenge for the interrogator. Getting at the information they possess could allow us to thwart major attacks, unravel their organization, and save thousands of lives. They and their situation pose one of the strongest arguments in modern times for the use of torture...

Describing the clandestine war, (Cofer)Black said, "This is a highly classified area. All I want to say is that there was ’before 9/11’ and ’after 9/11.’ After 9/11 the gloves came off." He was referring to the overall counterterrorism effort, but in the context of detained captives the line was suggestive...

Candor and consistency are not always public virtues. Torture is a crime against humanity, but coercion is an issue that is rightly handled with a wink, or even a touch of hypocrisy; it should be banned but also quietly practiced. Those who protest coercive methods will exaggerate their horrors, which is good: it generates a useful climate of fear. It is wise of the President to reiterate U.S. support for international agreements banning torture, and it is wise for American interrogators to employ whatever coercive methods work. It is also smart not to discuss the matter with anyone.

If interrogators step over the line from coercion to outright torture, they should be held personally responsible. But no interrogator is ever going to be prosecuted for keeping Khalid Sheikh Mohammed awake, cold, alone, and uncomfortable. Nor should he be.

A very thorough and well-researched piece on interrogation and the questions it raises and answers
Posted by:John

#7  Very good article--but then considering it's written by Mark Bowden, that's to be expected!
Posted by: Dar   2003-11-15 6:44:53 PM  

#6  Definitely worth the time. Thank you John for pointing out that article. It's what journalism should be...

Vic
Posted by: Vic   2003-11-15 6:38:19 PM  

#5  "the big ol' t-shirt of shame"

Yeah... but I keep seeing...
Time to make the the doughnuts...
Posted by: Shipman   2003-11-15 5:37:00 PM  

#4  "the big ol' t-shirt of shame"

Haha! Most of the detainees looked like they had been in a mountain cave, starving. He looked like he had been hiding out in a Golden Corral buffet.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-11-15 4:57:23 PM  

#3  by the way - Khalid oughtta really invest in a good body waxing - at least his back hair :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2003-11-15 4:40:46 PM  

#2  God help me I can't remember who, but one of the female bloggers (meryl?) called his outfit in the picture when he was captured - "the big ol' t-shirt of shame", something which has brought a smile to my face every time I remember it...I think it was in reference to the newly available action figures of the terrorists and US heroes...:-)
Posted by: Frank G   2003-11-15 4:38:52 PM  

#1  Holy Cow, this article is AWESOME.

And if you don't think the cattle prods and field telephones aren't being applied to the testicles in hasty field interrogations, you should stick to PlaySkool.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-11-15 4:27:00 PM  

00:00