Submit your comments on this article |
Iraq |
Quagmire angle refuted |
2003-11-12 |
Hat tip LGF, EFL Bob Arnot, who rarely appears on NBC News programs, popped up Monday night on MSNBCâs Hardball with Chris Matthews to contradict the image of chaos in Iraq hyped by the media. Launching Hardballâs week-long series, âIraq: The Real Story,â Arnot recounted the challenges faced by troops in hostile areas, but countered the negative image of the Iraqi situation he knows Americans get from TV news. And part of the reason I read the warblogs. Arnot argued: âThe real question is, given all the death and destruction that you see on television in the United States, whatâs the real deal out here? The fact is in 85 percent of the country, itâs calm, itâs stable, itâs moving forward. You find a lot of places like Horia [sp?], where we were today, and Kadame [sp] where they actually like or even love Americans.âTouring a shopping area, Arnot relayed how, âfrom what you see on TV from Baghdad youâd think that, with the mortars and rockets, that this was a city under siege.â In fact, he contended, ânothing could be further from the truth in many neighborhoods.â Arnot sounded like a spokesman for the Baghdad Chamber of Commerce, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens observed, as he admired the selection of merchandise available: âThey also have here some of the latest fashions, they will tell you from Milan, Paris, and Damascus. Hereâs another store here, ladies clothing with jeans, the latest shoes, nice pocket books.â And a variety of philosophies and religions. Arnot began with time in spent with some troops in an area where Americans are less welcome: âIt had all the ingredients for disaster. A Sunni town, home to over 100,000 former Iraqi soldiers, 1,000 generals and dangerous terror cells. From this battle command center, the Armyâs 101st Air Assault Division has engineered what many thought impossible: local elections within weeks of the warâs end; schools kept open; and Iraqi police training to get back on the street fast. Still while there was no major insurrection, there are now daily attacks on U.S. troops, with RPGs, improvised explosive devices, mortars, even rockets.â Unidentified officer: âItâs been a tough couple weeks when you really look at it.âMatthews inquired of Arnot: âBob, can our military locate, target and destroy our enemies over there right now?â Arnot: âWell, they have a lot of help. They have been able to take 75 percent of the terrorists off the street in Mosul. What theyâre finding, especially after some of the big bombings like the RCIC, a lot more people are coming forward. Theyâre like their 9/11 there. They really hate a lot of these guys. You have a number of different elements. At the very top, you have the old regime. They took two generals off the street in Fallujah the other day. Tens of millions of dollars to spend. The ominous thing is that theyâre finding the really bad neighborhoods have a combination of the Islamists, Wahhabis, Ansar al-Islam and the old regime. Thatâs where you have the strange collusion thatâs sort of morphing into a quasi-Islamic revolution here. And at the bottom, just a bunch of bad guys.Matthews: âBob, would more troops help the effort?â Arnot: âI donât really think so. I think the bottom line is you want to get more and more Iraqis out on the front. Youâre gonna see it in a couple days a great story here I did with the 17th Field Artillery. What they did is they went out and they hired ex-Republican Guards. They put them into a private security company. They play the national anthem. They have Iraqi colonels back out there. They have a great deal of pride in it. The more Iraqis you get out there in front of American soldiers, the better, whether itâs the civilian defense corps or the police, theyâre training them. Thatâs the real solution, is to get more out there and have terrific intelligence....âMatthews: âDo the Iraqi people themselves know who is fighting us? In other words, are they a clearly identifiable group of people? The remnants of the, the, the government, the new Jihadists who have joined them. Do the people of Iraq, if you had them under interrogation, would they be able to say, âThe Rover behind that corner around there.â Would they know that? The people themselves?â Arnot: âYou know, a lot of people donât know that. I met last night one of the chief ayatollahs, one of the chief Shiah clerics here in the country and he said, âLook, there are three different groups here weâre concerned about. The Wahhabi, he basically believes thereâs command and control from Saudi Arabia. You have the ex-regime power brokers, as they call them right now. You have this sort of new Islamist morphing here, a very, very sort of fundamentalist movement....The Iraqi people seem to be a lot more optimistic than most American journalists. Arnot is the exception that proves the rule. A sensible reporter! |
Posted by:Atrus |
#2 Arnot's terrific, and an interesting specimen: medical doctor, pilot, Arabic-speaker, and now correspondent. For those who missed his live feeds with the USMC during the major combat phase, they were a real treat. The guy not only provides vastly superior straight reporting on the major issues he's covering -- in the middle of a live feed, he'd start asking locals in Arabic about medical or other problems, and help them out or vector in a Navy corpsman to do so. Reporter, doctor, interpreter, and diplomat in one. It's astounding -- and completely unsurprising -- that he's not very prominent in NBC's coverage. Instead, we get Andrea Mitchell's cartoon-ravings from DC, talking very stale inside State Dept. gossip and passing it off as insight. The contrast and the combined cluelessness and bias of editors and maangement couldn't be more clear. |
Posted by: IceCold 2003-11-12 9:29:47 PM |
#1 Holy Cow! I can't believe this is going down very well at Rockefeller Center. I'm sure that fat worthless POS Nachman is out to get Arnot's ass right about now for not screaming 'VIETNAM!' in his piece. I just wonder how it got past the DNC censors. Don't they have editorial approval over any 'news' item, or am I thinking about CNN/CBS? |
Posted by: Anonymous 2003-11-12 5:49:35 PM |