| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Iran | |
| Iran Turns Over Nuclear Program Documents | |
| 2003-10-24 | |
| Iran gave the U.N. nuclear watchdog a dossier meant to dispel fears it is trying to make atomic bombs, but a Tehran envoy acknowledged Thursday the files omitted key information about a bomb-making ingredient found in the country. The unclean infidel dog ate it! Ali Akbar Salehi, Iran’s chief delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency, suggested to The Associated Press that the dossier did not specify the origin of traces of highly enriched weapons-grade uranium found in his country by agency experts.
"But if it isn’t, no problem. We’re the IAEA." The United States accuses Iran of running a weapons program and points to the discovery of highly enriched uranium as strong evidence of such activity. Iran insists the traces, found in environmental samples, were inadvertently imported on equipment meant to generate electricity and says it does not know where the equipment originated because it was purchased through third parties. "It’s a mystery to us!" When asked Thursday if the dossier specified where the equipment came from, Salehi repeated that argument, suggesting that the information was missing. "How can you give the (equipment’s) origin ... if you have taken it from the intermediaries on the foreign market?" Salehi said. But earlier, after meeting with ElBaradei, Salehi said the dossier answers all "open questions" about Iran’s nuclear programs. "We have submitted a report fully disclosing all our past activities in the nuclear field," he said. Brazen, isn’t he? The IAEA has said traces of highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium were found on centrifuges at a plant in Natanz, about 300 miles south of Tehran. Minute quantities of the substance also were found at the Kalay-e Electric Co., just west of Tehran. An agency report also noted tests by Iran that experts say make little sense unless the country was pursuing nuclear weapons. Diplomats familiar with the situation said any failure by Tehran to clear up concerns about the weapons-grade uranium would damage its case ahead of a Nov. 20 meeting of the IAEA’s board of governors. If the board finds that suspicions remain about a possible weapons program, it could find Iran in violation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That would mean U.N. Security Council involvement and possible international sanctions. Except the French have already said that there won’t be any sanctions. To verify Tehran’s claim about the origin of the uranium, the IAEA needs to match traces found in Iran to isotope samples from the country from which the contaminated equipment allegedly came. If the samples do not match, arguments by the United States and its allies that Iran enriched the uranium as part of an arms program would be strengthened. Diplomats have told AP that Pakistan is the most likely country of origin for the centrifuges. But that nuclear power is not a member of the nonproliferation treaty and does not have to cooperate with the IAEA. Not withstanding the fact they’re allies and all, ya know. Iran previously insisted it would continue enriching uranium to non-weapons levels. But on Tuesday, Iran told the foreign ministers of Britain, Germany and France it would suspend uranium enrichment and sign a protocol allowing spot checks of its nuclear programs. ElBaradei said Thursday he was expecting a letter "in the next few days ... agreeing to the conclusion" of the additional protocol. Thus providing the French the cover to veto any resolution regarding sanctions from the UN. | |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #5 I am sure they are developing nukes, but I am resonably sure that they will not threaten the US forces with the Nukes. I am willing to play chicken with them while this plays out. Already the hard-liners are protesting that the governement signed the protocol. It will be intersting to see how the Iranian government assuages its peoples pride without letting on that they still intend to develop nukes. Wonder how the Iraian Nobel Laureate feels about Iran's efforts to develop nukes. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2003-10-24 6:20:22 PM |
| #4 Someone once said "Trust but verify." Still wise words. |
| Posted by: Cyber Sarge 2003-10-24 5:12:01 PM |
| #3 The logical next step is to blanket the country with inspection personnel, with an eye toward unannounced checks. The first instance of obstruction, should it happen, would be a good indication that something else is going on. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2003-10-24 12:57:59 PM |
| #2 This agreement is bogus. Iran will only "suspend" enrichment; it reserves the right to resume. In interview in Le Monde, an Iranian honcho was asked directly about this loophole and didn't answer the question, just ran around it talking about past injustices, etc, from West... haven't we seen this precedent set by Clinton-N. Korean '94 agreement? Let's not be dupes to Iranians or Weasels. History has shown us the result of such head-in-the-sand policies. |
| Posted by: michael 2003-10-24 12:31:41 PM |
| #1 Iran is really starting to sound familiar.... |
| Posted by: Charles 2003-10-24 11:46:41 AM |