You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: North
Gaddafi separates from Arabs
2003-10-07
We ran the al-Jazeera version of this story on Sunday, but what the hell? This has a bit more to it...
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, once a devoted and energetic champion of Arab unity, announced this weekend his definitive separation from the Arabs, whom he heavily criticised.
"To hell with 'em. I'm gonna be a African..."
Standing before a group of women, in a Mediterranean villa in Syrte about 500km east of Tripoli, Gaddafi declared himself more than ever African, claiming to be "forever beyond nationalism and Arab unity."
"Yup. I'm givin' it up. Just another bad habit..."
Admittedly, Gaddafi is famous for his verbal excesses and spectacular rebuttals, but his declaration on Saturday sounded like an irreconcilable divorce from the Arabs, coming from the mouth of an ageing Gaddafi who in recent years has never given up on the ideals from his youth.
"When I was young, I thought I was gonna be an Arab Lenin. Then I thought I'd be an Arab Chairman Mao. Hell, I even wrote a Little Green Book. But now... now... I gotta be me-e-e! I gotta be me..."
When he took power on September 1, 1969, the young leader, raised in the cult of the former president, the Egyptian unionist Jamal Abdel Nasser, threw himself body and soul into attempting unity. He would court Egypt, the Sudan, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco, regardless of whether they bordered on Libya. On Saturday, he also referred to the symbolic date of September 28, 1961 which ushered in the end of the Syrian-Egyptian union which had for three years formed the United Arab Republic to better support their common agenda. "The era of nationalism and of Arab unity is forever gone. These ideas which once mobilised masses no longer have any value," he said.
"The masses yawned, en masse..."
Gaddafi called on the Popular Congress, the basic structure of the Libyan political system, to "confirm Libya's withdrawal from the Arab League," envisioned by Tripoli for months but never realised.
"Yeah. Let's get outta here and have some fun!"
"The Arab League is in the middle of giving up the ghost, and Arabs will never be strong even if they unite... They will remain content every night to watch bloody newsreels from Palestine and Iraq."
"We can do better than that. We're gonna have General Hospital and All My Children. The writing's better, and they make more sense..."
Gaddafi had some strong words for the Arabs, denying them human qualities, and publicly challenging their former policy of helping movements and political groups from Arab countries. "Libya has for too long endured the Arabs, for whom we have paid blood and money," he said, adding that as a result, his country had been "boycotted by the US and demonised by the West."
"Really, I think we should try something else for awhile..."
"In return, the Arabs joined forces with the US and Israel against Libya," he continued, as he confirmed his African orientation, viewing the continent as "a source of great force" for his country.
"I mean, we play our cards right, we could be another Belgium..."
This confession was made by an appeased leader, whose country had its international sanctions lifted after agreeing to pay $10m to the family of each of the 270 victims killed during the explosion of a Pan Am flight over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, blamed on Libyan hijackers.
"That blowin' people up stuff don't come cheap..."
And once more the top Libyan put his faith in women, deeming them "better than men and more capable."
"I mean, I really like babes!"
Gaddafi, who travels with a female security detail, called on Libyan women on October 1 to train themselves against "the enemy," and to be inspired by the women of Africa, whose situation he believes, is better than that of Eastern and Western women.
Arab unity dream theory shattered? Well a bit late, in practice Israel had done that already.
I disagree with that. Israel's been the only thing holding them together in the face of competing national interests...
Posted by:Murat

#17  North Africa used to be a prosperous area in the classical age - it was the breadbasket of Rome.

Its civilization was mostly externally imposed, though. Carthage was a colony, and it was replaced by Romans, Greeks and (I believe) Vandals. Probably the Arabs, with their tribal society, had more in common with the Berbers and Libyans and similar tribes. But a tribal structure isn't the path to modern prosperity. "Pan-Arabism" is an extension of that tribal outlook. If Muammar views Libya as a nation he might be on the right track, though he shouldn't expect overnight results.
Posted by: Fred   2003-10-7 8:15:08 PM  

#16  I wonder how many other countries will back out of the Arab League now? Probably zero, but we can always hope.
Posted by: Charles   2003-10-7 7:13:04 PM  

#15  Mo will just say Arabic is language that Africans like him adopted for usage, like English, French and Portugese. Anybody read his book?
Posted by: OminousWhatever   2003-10-7 5:54:03 PM  

#14  So now that Muammar thinks he's "African", will he speak something other than Arabic? ;)
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-10-7 4:17:28 PM  

#13  In times of Saddat, Khaddafi proposed the union between Egypt and Lybia. Egypt rejected it.
Posted by: JFM   2003-10-7 2:51:06 PM  

#12  I read unsubstantiated reports that Egypt and Lybia shared a tunnel complex on their border where they were jointly developping WMD's. Probably could be tracked back to the Mossad.
Posted by: Superhose   2003-10-7 12:48:11 PM  

#11  I'm still amazed that Egypt hasn't absorbed Libya (oil, underpopulated). After all Arab on Arab wars are acceptable to the Arabs if you just throw out Arab Brotherhood and caliph into the propoganda.The UN could be used as an after-action excuse because of Libyan meddling in subSahara Africa. The Europeans could be bought off with oil contracts, and the US couldn't side with Libya.

Adding oil to Egypts population would make them the undisputed ruler of the Arab world.Certainly Libya would be a pushover compared to Israel.It's a no-brainer from what I can see. So why hasn't Egypt gone West?
Posted by: Yank   2003-10-7 12:28:30 PM  

#10  This switch to an Africa-Central policy is just a recognition of the fact that Lybia can't possibly be implicated in every mess in the Arab world while simultaneously stirring the pot throughout Africa.

Should we encourage Africa to be lead by Lybia or South Africa? I am getting a headache.
Posted by: Superhose   2003-10-7 11:56:24 AM  

#9  Khaddafy's Fembots are pretty tough, they would kick arab ass
Posted by: Frank G   2003-10-7 11:14:55 AM  

#8  "Libya has for too long endured the Arabs, for whom we have paid blood and money,"

This just in: Super Conducting Ribs Raise Puzzled Porker
Posted by: Shipman   2003-10-7 9:56:46 AM  

#7  To Libya?? Cut the guy (Khadafi) some slack, maybe he's about to croak.
Posted by: Rafael   2003-10-7 9:02:22 AM  

#6  Over an hour the Turkish Parliament will vote on the sending of troops, exactly at 15:00 (timezone GMT + 2).
Posted by: Murat   2003-10-7 6:44:49 AM  

#5  And when he loses an interest in being an African, maybe he can look into Mediterranean unity, perhaps a reborn Roman Empire? (With himself as Caesar, of course)
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2003-10-7 6:12:02 AM  

#4  Uh, sure thing... If Khadaffy Duck has a moment of serendipity, of illumination, wherein he finally grasps that he is and has been a terrorist asshole and suddenly chooses to cease and desist, well then, we won't send any more F-111 PaveTack missions to Tripoli. This is ample reward and encouragement for his actions, thus far. If he wants candy and flowers, well he's gonna have to do a tad more than acknowledge his assholedness as a Arab tool. Methinks a knobshine is long overdue, and I hereby volunteer to represent the US in this important rapprochement by selecting which of his bodyguards should apply this important symbolic gesture to my, uh, person...
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=5730
Posted by: .com   2003-10-7 6:02:57 AM  

#3  I don't agree Ben. He's had more than enough of a go. It's time he stood down.
Posted by: different anonymous coward   2003-10-7 5:51:06 AM  

#2  All true. But if he is saying the right thing now, that should be rewarded, and encouraged.
Posted by: Ben   2003-10-7 5:38:05 AM  

#1  The man is a buffoon who could come out and say the exact opposite tomorrow. I don't trust wacky Muslims who wear purple robes and other bizarre get ups.

Posted by: anonymous coward   2003-10-7 5:05:31 AM  

00:00