| Submit your comments on this article |
| Korea |
| KCNA Dismisses Story about DPRK’s "Drug Smuggling" as Political Plot |
| 2003-10-03 |
| Looks like their "dignity" is bent out of shape... again. U.S. President Bush in a recent statement reportedly expressed "concern about north Korea’s drug smuggling", calling for increased efforts to check it. This is an undisguised expression of foolish and shameful move of the U.S. administration to charge the DPRK with "drug smuggling" in a bid to isolate it internationally. ... or isolate us even more then we do ourselves. Explicitly speaking, drug production, use and trafficking are prohibited by law in the DPRK. Drug abuse and trafficking can never happen in the DPRK where sound consciousness, way of thinking and way of life of people are developing and there is a solid foundation of the independent national economy. Nothing to see here... As far as drug smuggling is concerned, it is the U.S. that should be taken to task before any other countries. According to information available, there are more than 60 markets in Washington where drug is illegally trafficked and there are at least 450 big secret organizations in the U.S. engaged in drug smuggling and trafficking. Yeah, there’s at least 450 big secret organizations... A total of hundreds of millions of drug dealers travel inside and outside the U.S. and a total of 800,000 voyages and flights to and from the country are involved in this illegal business every year. Another KCNA "pick a big number" survey... When looking back on the U.S. history, "wars against drug" were declared so many times and drug-related crimes produced many mentally deranged people in the U.S. Yet, Bush did not utter even a word about the reality in his own country widely known as "biggest drug abuser", "cesspool of drug crimes" and "drug smuggler" but cried out for tightening the "control" over the DPRK’s "drug smuggling". This is, indeed, the height of folly. Timed to coincide with Bush’s remarks, the U.S. administration is clamouring for sanctions against north Korea over its "flesh traffic". It is not difficult to guess the sinister aim sought by the U.S. in escalating its political diatribe about non-existent "drug smuggling" and "flesh traffic" by the DPRK. White Slag + flesh traffic = We need nukes. It’s so obvious! At the six-way talks the U.S. came out with more brigandish demand than its earlier assertion that the DPRK should "scrap its nuclear program first" only to face a stern warning from the latter. The U.S. assertion is censured worldwide for its unilateral and self-righteous nature. Oooooooohhhh...stern warnings. Drugs, hookers, nukes... too bad Warren Zevon’s dead. He could work with that. Much upset by this, the U.S. is busy floating all sorts of misinformation about the DPRK along with the story about its "nuclear development program" in a bid to reinforce the unsuccessful assertion and bring it to its knees. Yeah...psssst... and Kimmie wears lifts and has poofy hair to look taller. Take that, ya Commie bastards! The U.S. had better make a bold switchover in its hostile policy toward the DPRK, clearly mindful that with nothing can Washington mislead the unbiased public opinion and tarnish the international image of the DPRK. Everybody already knows we’re insane, so why bother? |
| Posted by:tu3031 |
| #7 High on White Slag, low on grass and tree bark. Bizarro Universe. BTW, this rant rates a 3.5 (like Steve White hints at, No Juche, No Glory), although I too liked the use of the word 'brigandish'. |
| Posted by: Raj 2003-10-3 9:00:57 PM |
| #6 The U.S. had better make a bold switchover Pure Juche 7.5 with 2 points for new crosscurrent language. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2003-10-3 7:35:54 PM |
| #5 Commies always have the best dope. ;> |
| Posted by: mojo 2003-10-3 7:30:35 PM |
| #4 SW - musta got a stolen copy of Pirates of the Carribean |
| Posted by: Frank G 2003-10-3 6:54:34 PM |
| #3 [holds up card] 4.5 No juche, no army-based policy, and "height of folly" is just lame. But they did come up with "brigandish". |
| Posted by: Steve White 2003-10-3 3:54:53 PM |
| #2 For someone who does not engage in drug smuggling... they sure seem to know a lot about the illegal drug market in the U.S..... And you are right. This sure does have kimmie-boy's pantyhose in a knot for some reason. In any case I give this a '3' on the spittle meter. Mainly due to: 1) Did not call anyone a 'stupid man'. 2) No mention of the the Glorious Kims. 3) Sentences too short (less then 50 words/sentence) |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2003-10-3 3:32:49 PM |
| #1 Hope Kimmy snorts to much and keels over dead. |
| Posted by: Charles 2003-10-3 2:15:03 PM |