| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Powell Rejects French Timetable for Iraq |
| 2003-09-13 |
| GENEVA (AP) - Secretary of State Colin Powell on Friday rejected as "totally unrealistic" a French timetable for the full transfer of authority in Iraq to local control, starting with the establishment of a provisional government next month. Everything the French propose is unrealistic. This is news? French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin allegedly a man outlined the proposals on the eve of a meeting here Saturday involving U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and representatives of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. Powell will meet separately with each of his colleagues, including de Villepin, who has been a persistent foe of American policy in Iraq since before the American-led invasion. Given the differences with the views of France and other countries, Powell predicted that the debate will be "spirited." Colin hunts around for the Clue Bat™ ... In an opinion piece in the French "It would be delightful if one could do that but one can’t do that," Powell told reporters while en route to Switzerland. Colin then picks up the Clue Bat™ and says ... The French, in effect, are proposing that "we stop everything we’re doing," he said. "We have invested too much to consider such a proposal." Batter up! In comments that appeared to be directed at France, Powell said the United States has a long record as a liberator of countries and not as an occupier. "We’ve done a lot of liberation in Europe after other Europeans had occupied parts of Europe," Powell said. "For example, we liberated the French from Vichy!" In the discussions here, Powell will defend a U.S. proposal before the Security Council that invites the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council to cooperate with the United Nations and U.S. officials in Baghdad to produce "a timetable and program for the drafting of a new constitution for Iraq and for the holding of democratic elections." It contains no time frame, and it leaves the key decisions in the hands of the Governing Council. The resolution also calls for the creation of a multinational force under a unified U.N. command with an American commander. Russia and Germany, a rotating member of the Security Council, have joined France in opposing the U.S. draft resolution. Oh well, we tried. Powell said he believes the draft has the required minimum of nine votes for approval - assuming there is no veto. "I think we’re pretty far up the ladder," he said. "Please, De Villepin, in his article, wrote, "Today, it is urgent to transfer sovereignty to the Iraqi people themselves to permit them to fully assume their responsibilities." De Villepin and responsibility in the same sentence? Isn’t that illegal in some countries? He added that continuing on the current path in Iraq runs "the risk of entering into a spiral with no In a Thursday interview with France’s TV2 network, a copy of which was made available Friday, Powell said he agrees that sovereignty should be returned to the Iraqi people but only when conditions are ripe. "To whom do we give it?" he asked. "We have to create a government. We have to create a parliament. We have to put in place a constitution after it’s been written. We have to have elections. Nobody wants to turn sovereignty back to the Iraqis as fast as the United States does, President Bush does and I do." Asked if the United Nations should play a leading role, Powell replied: "I said vital. I don’t know what leading means." "And I’m not interested in finding out!" Powell said Wednesday in an interview with Al-Jazeera, the Arab satellite network, that Iraq would face "total chaos" if the United States surrendered to demands for a hasty U.S. transfer of authority to Iraqi control. Interesting what this resolution has done -- it has smoked out the Indians and Paks since neither will commit troops after all. It shows us who our real |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #7 Good call. We need more time for inspections. Stop this "rush to war". Give inspections as long as it takes. And NOW ? Where's the patience ? Assholes. |
| Posted by: eyeyeye 2003-9-13 6:02:38 PM |
| #6 Occupation timetables for Germany and Japan are dated and not applicable to this situation. The timetable for the Syrian occupation of Lebanon would be a closer model, right? ... |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2003-9-13 5:57:58 PM |
| #5 Ironic that after over 12 years of foot dragging on Iraq before with no intent to do anything, they want an overnight change of power? Hey France, "Go F*@K yourself!" Indian and Pakland troops are useless anyways. (Good to know who wear the "yellow" turbans.) Oh, wait...they do make excellent hat racks. |
| Posted by: Paul 2003-9-13 3:12:59 PM |
| #4 ... de Villepin wrote that a provisional government should be established in Iraq in a month, a draft constitution by the end of the year and elections next spring. Elections which the Phrawnce would be more than happy to... suggest... candidates for. After all, part of the "responsibilites" is paying off those Phrench IOUs |
| Posted by: Pappy 2003-9-13 11:14:06 AM |
| #3 Meanwhile, Big Daddy and the Heavy Crew are in Mockba talking Turkey... |
| Posted by: mojo 2003-9-13 3:10:41 AM |
| #2 Dubya has to disinvite Prez Putty from his announced upcoming visit to Da Ranch. The guy's just a total loss and waste of space. I'd call him a political whore, but that'd be an insult to all whores. The kind I know, and love, are the most honest people on the planet. Putty's the inverse variety. |
| Posted by: .com (Prez for Life - My Isles of Langerhans) 2003-9-13 2:40:17 AM |
| #1 Iraq is already stabilizing as it is. Sure, we might get attack here and there, but it's nothing like whats it used to be. |
| Posted by: Charles 2003-9-13 1:50:04 AM |