You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
James Lileks: "Two years in; the rest of our lives to go."
2003-09-11
The Daily Bleat for 9/11/03. EFL.
When I was a kid I was terrified of the End of the World. Kids heard things; older kids who’d read that ridiculous end-times tract, “The Late Great Planet Earth” said it foretold a struggle between the “bear” and the “eagle” and we all knew what that meant. . .

Now I am resigned, in advance, to the loss of an American city by a nuclear weapon. The End of the World now looks like a comic-book premise, a Heston-movie conceit. We feared it would all be gone in a day, our world upended like an Etch-A-Sketch. What we never considered was a long, slow war, a conflict that burned and sputtered, skittered from one spot on the map to the other. The old wars were simple: the other side had accents, uniforms, nations, cruel habits and urbane sneers. The old wars took years. The old wars were in black and white. The old wars were monophonic, scored by Max Steiner, released by Warner Brothers, and the only proof they really happened at all was the small battered box in the back of Dad’s sock drawer, the box that held some oddly colored metal bars. The next war would be horrible, total, and short.

Two years ago today I was convinced that every presumption I had about the future was wrong. This war, I feared, would be horrible, total, and long.

Two years later I take a certain grim comfort in some people’s disinterest in the war; if you’d told me two years ago that people would be piling on the President and bitching about slow progress in Iraq, I would have known in a second that the nation hadn’t suffered another attack. When the precise location of Madonna’s tongue is big news, you can bet the hospitals aren’t full of smallpox victims. Of course some people are impatient with those who still recall the shock of 9/11; the same people were crowding the message boards of internet sites on the afternoon of the attacks, eager to blame everyone but the hijackers. They hate this nation. In their hearts, they hate humanity. They would rather cheer the perfect devils than come to the aid of a compromised angel. They can talk for hours about how wrong it was to kill babies, busboys, businessmen, receptionists, janitors, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers - and then they lean towards you, eyes wide, and they say the fatal word:

But.

And then you realize that the eulogy is just a preface. All that concern for the dead is nothing more than the knuckle-cracking of an organist who’s going to play an E minor chord until we all agree we had it coming.

I’ve no doubt that if Seattle or Boston or Manhattan goes up in a bright white flash there will be those who blame it all on Bush. We squandered the world’s good will. We threw away the opportunity to atone, and lashed out. Really? You want to see lashing out? Imagine Kabul and Mecca and Baghdad and Tehran on 9/14 crowned with mushroom clouds: that’s lashing out. Imagine the President in the National Cathedral castigating Islam instead of sitting next to an Imam who’s giving a homily. Mosques burned, oil fields occupied, smart bombs slamming into Syrian palaces. We could have gone full Roman on anyone we wanted, but we didn’t. And we won’t.

Which is why this war will be long.

The world will not end. It will roll around in its orbit until Sol expires of famine or indigestion. In the end we’re all ash anyway - but even as ash, we matter. The picture at the top of this page earlier this week - that blue abstract swirl - was a sliver taken from a 9/11 camera feed. It’s the cloud that rolled through lower Manhatttan when the towers fell. Paper, steel, furniture, plastic, people. The man who took the picture inhaled the dust of the dead. Somewhere lodged in the lung of a New Yorker is an atom that once belonged to a man who went to work two years ago and never came back. His widow dreads today, because people will be coming and calling, and she’ll have to insist that she’s okay. It’s hard but last year was harder. The kids will be sad and distant, but they take their cues from her, and they sense that it’s hard - but that last year was harder. But what really kills her, really really kills her, is knowing that the youngest one doesn’t remember daddy at all anymore. And she’s the one who has his eyes.

Two years in; the rest of our lives to go.
Posted by:Mike

#5  After the memorial service at the National Cathedral Rev. Billy Graham was being interviewed, and when asked if he thought there was going to be war he replied "yes I think there is and we should use every weapon in our arsenal to win it."
The reporter then asked if he meant even WMDs and he replied yes.
Posted by: Someone who did NOT vote for William Proxmire   2003-9-11 6:49:27 PM  

#4  There is one thing he forgets whne talking about the
"It is terrible BUT" people: their utter, total and abject hypocrisy. When they whinned about the Afghans or the Iraquis who would be killed was it out of concern for them? BS. Every day the Taliban were stoning women or letting them die without medical assistance, starving regions who resisted them, making bloodbaths of Hazaras like at Mazar el Sharif or at Bamiyan. Every day the people of Al Quaida were trying a new torture on hapless prisoners, like those Afghans soldiers who had their arms and legs sawn. Every day after the fall of Taliban has saved Afghan lives. Saddam has been gassing and murdering an average of AT LEAST one thousand people per month. At least as many children were dying each month during the "Oil for Palaces" program. Every month since its fall AT LEAST one thousand Iraquis have been saved from death, many of a horrendous death. At least as many children haven't died from lack of medical care.

But that is nothing for the Euros and the pacifists. It is nothing because both Afghans and Iraquis mean nothing for them. It is because both Afghan and Iraqui child are only tools to be used and discarded. It is all about their little, inflated egos. It is all about needing to scream "Death of America! It is all about oil" in order to feel themselves superior. It is all about the vision of America's destruction giving them a hard-on. Their hard-on, this is the noble goal they would gladly sacrifice every Afaghan or Iraqui child in world.
Posted by: JFM   2003-9-11 4:33:55 PM  

#3  Lileks just has the gift, the irrevrant Irish part of me calls it the blarney, the reverent Irish part of me thinks of it as the gift of the bard. Whatever you call it, I could read/listen to him for hours. He gave me something else, too... I'm childless at 50, so I'd long had no one's future to worry about (just an abstract...my country, humanity...). Now I can personify it...I worry about the Gnat's future and I'll do all I can to see she (and all the little ones she represents)has one.
Posted by: Hodadenon   2003-9-11 3:52:13 PM  

#2  You want to see lashing out? Imagine Kabul and Mecca and Baghdad and Tehran on 9/14 crowned with mushroom clouds: that’s lashing out.

He forgot Medina. And, yeah, did I ever imagine that by about 3pm 9/11/01! And quite a bit of 9/12, and 9/13, too.

Later, after the 14 month "rush" to war in Iraq, after the statue of Saddam came down, I'd see the Iraqi kids offering cups of water to soldiers and marines. Then, I was kinda glad that we didn't bomb Baghdad flat on general principal.
Posted by: eLarson   2003-9-11 3:29:07 PM  

#1  Lileks, like Steyn, is a treasure...
Posted by: snellenr   2003-9-11 3:18:45 PM  

00:00