You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
A report on curricula in Pakistan
2003-08-25
Social studies textbooks in the Urdu language, printed by the government and used in government-run schools and institutions, fudge facts and indoctrinate students with a jaundiced worldview. The most comprehensive analyses of this phenomenon in Pakistan is historian Prof KK Aziz’s “The Murder of History,” published by Vanguard Books Pvt Ltd. Social Studies for Students used in classes four through ten comes in seven versions. The subject is compulsory study for students in all state-sponsored schools and the textbook is the only book available to these schools. This later dovetails into Pakistan Studies, where even private schools are forced to teach a couple of texts that have been written at the behest of the state and project a certain idea of Pakistan, its supposed friends and adversaries. The books, which do not name the authors, are literary equivalent of hate speech.
Comes as a surprise, doesn't it? I know. It floored me, too...
These books would not be out of place in any madrassah preparing the young for an early grave. “Hindu” India and Britain are depicted as enemies while Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Ummah are extolled. The Pakistan Army and its ‘three decisive victories’ over India are mentioned liberally and are an example of how institutional attempt has been made to rewrite history.
Since they were drubbed all three times...
Words like “dark”, “ugly” and “short” are used to describe Hindus while Muslims are presented in glowing terms. Atrocities committed by Muslim invaders are glossed over while those by Hindu and Sikh invaders magnified. Invasions led by Muslims are justified as having been necessary for the expansion of Islam whereas Hindu-led invasions are depicted bleakly. Hindus are also reported as having colluded with the English to suppress the Muslims. “Muslims have always helped the Hindus who have only returned the favour by massacring innocent Muslims,” the textbook for Class IV makes plain on Page 85. “India is an enemy. Its designs are nefarious. We should receive military training so that we could fight our enemy,” it suggests on Page 112.
"Yes! We must plot, we must be devious, we must be ruthless to counter their nefarious plots!"
The propagation of the caste-system and of medieval practices such as satti (burning a widow on the husband’s pyre) are used to illustrate the inferiority of Hindu culture. India is condemned for “silently” attacking Pakistan on September 6, 1965. There is no mention of Operation Gibraltar under which Pakistan Army personnel in plainclothes went into Kashmir to support “locals” against India. Accounts of all Indo-Pakistan wars are similarly skewed with the upshot always in Pakistan’s favour. Fifth grade students, for example, are taught that the 1971 war was a Hindu conspiracy. In September 1981, Pakistan offered India a no-war pact but India evaded the issue and started raising unnecessary objections over Pakistan’s foreign policy, the books say. “Indo-Pak relations improved in 1990,” near the time of a near nuclear standoff incidentally, “but suspicions remained as India was not sincere in fairly settling the Kashmir issue.”
That means they didn't cave, of course...
Muslim countries are thanked for their support to Pakistan over Kashmir and General Pervez Musharraf is lionised for broaching the subject at the Agra Summit last year. “President of Pakistan presented the Kashmir case courageously and splendidly which was appreciated by the entire world but the summit failed.” One remarkable thing about these textbooks is the addition every ruler does to them. Sometimes, previous rulers are either criticised or just ignored. For instance, during General Zia-ul Haq’s period, all references to prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto were removed. Citing the signing of the 1973 constitution, for instance, the textbook dealt with the issue in one small paragraph without a single reference to Bhutto.
EXCERPTS FROM CURRICULUM DOCUMENT FOR CLASSES K-V
National Bureau of Curriculum and Textbooks Federal Ministry of Education, 1995 Government of Pakistan.

At the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to:
· "Acknowledge and identify forces that may be working against Pakistan."
· "Demonstrate by actions a belief in the fear of Allah."
· "Make speeches on Jehad and Shahadat"
· "Understand Hindu-Muslim differences and the resultant need for Pakistan."
· "India’s evil designs against Pakistan."
· "Be safe from rumour mongers who spread false news"
· "Visit police stations"
· "Collect pictures of policemen, soldiers, and National Guards"
· "Demonstrate respect for the leaders of Pakistan"
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#8  This isn't any different than the B-S which the american public schools are doing now with their Politically Correct agenda. I dont think they even teach history anymore. (after all mention of slavery might offend someone and mention of the American Indians (pardon... Native Americans) might offend someone else.).

My son will be born pretty soon and I am determined not to have him go to a public school where he will have this Politically Correct bullshait is forced fed to him.

I just have to find a well balanced school which will give him a well rounded education.

I know... good luck... I will need it....
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-8-25 10:58:20 PM  

#7  I saw some article that a college in San Fransisco now offers a BA and MA in Social Activism. I would think that such a degree would make your resume look as enticing to employers as an anthrax sandwhich on Monster.com. Kind of limits your employment options the way tattooing a swaztika on your forehead would.
Posted by: Steve D   2003-8-25 3:25:04 PM  

#6  I think the best way to solve the problem is to require all tenured teachers to go through Marine basic training and spend 10 years in the reserves afterwards. That includes anything from Kindergarten through tenured Senior Professors on our college campuses.

I would also outlaw the NEA. Anyone joining after the law is signed into effect would automatically qualify for 30 years' hard labor in a UN NGO, preferably in Africa.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-8-25 1:56:42 PM  

#5  OP - You're right. So, where would you like to begin in the ConUS? We can make it a game. You get 5 dirty nukes and 15 neutron nukes. You'll prolly need lots more, but we can negotiate the rearming based on your point total after the initial strike wave. BTW, DC is off-limits. ;->
Posted by: .com   2003-8-25 11:56:28 AM  

#4  The real shame is that there are equally as biased textbooks being used in the United States. Most are not favorable to the US Constitution, our government, or any military operation. Rewriting history is just a small part - they are also rewriting the use of English language, corrupting social virtues, and really, really messing with kids' heads.

When a high school biology book spends more time talking about environmental destruction than about the differences between mammals and amphibians, we need to start worrying. Math suddenly "has no right or wrong answers". And people wonder why they can't get kids with enough knowledge to work in fast foods.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-8-25 11:48:09 AM  

#3  You can teach a person to believe absolutely anything - even things which his senses and intellect can detect or reason not to be true. Just start early enough, repeat often enough, and reinforce with approval & acceptance.

Anyone taking bets regards the funding source for undermining the text contents via bribes or "donations" or "other support"? This bears the clear MO of the Saudi Wahabbists. Want to stop the insanity? Stop indoctrination. How? Turn Saudi Arabia into a sheet of glass, for starters. BTW, we can drill through glass.

Better yet, bring back the neutron weapons that Geo41 had dismantled. Stupid decision that was a kowtow to the multilateralist / liberal outcry that a nuke weapon that kills, but doesn't destroy structures or facilities or leave the kill zone radioactive for N millenia was "bad" and "insane" - when logic tells you it's just the opposite. Amazing.
Posted by: .com   2003-8-25 11:33:29 AM  

#2  no surprises in this one, 's messed up over there
Posted by: dcreeper   2003-8-25 8:38:11 AM  

#1  *sigh* surprises here..
Posted by: dcreeper   2003-8-25 8:37:08 AM  

00:00