You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
In Lackawanna, no choice but guilty
2003-07-29
EFL - Read it all, weep for the guilty uh enemy combatants
LACKAWANNA, N.Y. — Even now, after the arrests and the anger and the world media spotlight, the mystery for neighbors in this old steel town remains this: Why would six of their young men so readily agree to plead guilty to terror charges, accepting long prison terms far from home? "The knuckleheads betrayed our trust, and we’re disgusted with their attendance at the camps in Afghanistan,” Mohammed Albanna, 52, a leader in the Yemeni community here, said of the six men who have admitted to attending an al Qaeda training camp two years ago. “But the punishment doesn’t fit the crime, or the government’s rhetoric. It’s ridiculous.”
These idjits are trying to apply criminal, civil law to cases of war and terror attacks ON AMERICANS. Cry me a f&^king river
But defense attorneys say the answer is straightforward: The federal government implicitly threatened to toss the defendants into a secret military prison without trial, where they could languish indefinitely without access to courts or lawyers. That prospect terrified the men. They accepted prison terms of 6 1/2 to 9 years. “We had to worry about the defendants being whisked out of the courtroom and declared enemy combatants if the case started going well for us,” said attorney Patrick J. Brown, who defended one of the accused. “So we just ran up the white flag and folded. Most of us wish we’d never been associated with this case.”
"I weep for you, the Walrus said..."
The Lackawanna case illustrates how the post-Sept. 11, 2001, legal landscape tilts heavily toward the prosecution, government critics contend. Future defendants in terror cases could face the same choice: Plead guilty or face the possibility of indefinite imprisonment or even the death penalty. That troubles defense attorneys and some legal scholars, not least because prosecutors never offered evidence that the Lackawanna defendants intended to commit an act of terrorism.
Except for the one they whacked in Yemen. Or was he just sight-seeing with a friend?
“The defendants believed that if they didn’t plead guilty, they’d end up in a black hole forever,” said Neal R. Sonnett, chairman of the American Bar Association’s Task Force on Treatment of Enemy Combatants. “There’s little difference between beating someone over the head and making a threat like that.”
Why not do both?
Why does the ABA have a task force on treatment of enemy combatants? Esprit D’ Corps?
Posted by:Frank G

#6  They got a mosque in Lackawanna? Any bets?
Posted by: tu3031   2003-7-29 9:35:02 PM  

#5  I am one liberal moonbat /Democrat who totally agrees--it is time to shut the damn door! If we don't we'll be dealing with the European problems
Posted by: Not Mike Moore   2003-7-29 8:54:18 PM  

#4  But they were just visiting Uncle Osama and had just finished Jihad fatwa 101--on their way to a brilliant career!
Posted by: Not Mike Moore   2003-7-29 4:04:26 PM  

#3  All the more reason for putting more people through military courts.
Posted by: mhw   2003-7-29 12:40:25 PM  

#2  I wish they had been thrown into a hole indefinitely.

What do Useful Idiots think these clowns were doing at the camps -- getting suntanned?
Posted by: someone   2003-7-29 11:22:52 AM  

#1  They accepted prison terms of 6 1/2 to 9 years.

With time off for good behavior, they'll be out in 4 years. I'm not sure how I feel about that.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2003-7-29 11:01:50 AM  

00:00