You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
"A Saudi Manhattan"
2003-05-14
Columnist 'Adel Zaid Al-Tarifi wrote (Al-Watan (Saudi Arabia), May 14, 2003.):
"
What many of the official sheikhs and columnists — who do not awaken until a catastrophe occurs — say about the phenomenon is inappropriate, and does not deal with the real causes and roots of the ideology of Jihad and of accusing [others] of heresy. They suffice by describing what took place as an imported ideology, and ignore the roots imprinted in our culture
 Our religious message includes many phenomena of religious extremism. A quick glance at the Friday sermons in the mosques or at the Fatwas can attest to this
"

"The Jihad groups find ideological cover in the religious message spread by the mosques and schools
 But even if we set aside the main reasons why the Jihad stream was formed, there are many other, selfish reasons
 The Fatwas, for example, that are issued by the leaders of the Jihad stream, and even by the sheikhs of the Islamic awakening [stream] in the past two years, have inflamed the emotions of many and provided a legitimate basis for these acts. Some Fatwas justified September 11; other Fatwas depicted these events as 'blessed [Islamic] raids.' During the Afghan and Iraq wars, the Fatwas sent many wretched young men to the hopeless battlefield
"

"The important question is this: What must be done? Many of the pulpits of education, such as the school, the home, and the mosque, need reform today. Anyone who wants to attribute what happened to economic or psychological conditions is missing the truth. These conditions can account for the behavior of criminals, but cannot account for a terror event based on religious belief. Religious terror cannot be contained, because it is part of the religious belief of those who carry it out. What can be done with people who think that anyone who does not agree with their fundamentalist path deviates from the path of righteousness? Those who carry out these deeds are not victims, but criminals
"

"These events are not newborn in our society, as some would like to present them. It is enough to mention the bombings of 1996, and of 1997. Reactions to these events were diverse. What is important regarding this most recent event is that it must not push us towards further religious extremism, as has happened in the past. Further religious extremism will lead us to a 'Saudi Manhattan.'"

"I wrote this article a day before the three bombings [and following the arrest of an Al Qa'ida cell in Saudi Arabia about a week ago], and I am sorry to say that the Saudi Manhattan has indeed happened."
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#4  Mike, that explains a lot. Difficult not to see Islam as one black box. But if there are differences, good to know which to root for/against.

tu - Think so? My anecdote: '83 - Lived in apt complex next to several Arabs who went to Spartan School of Aeronautics. They were from Saudi, Egypt, Iraq and Syria. Some in Flight. Some in Avionics/A&P. Wondered even back then if we were training our own enemies. I was studying ministry, and I befriended and talked to them about God. One (Egyptian - Yasser) even said he came to believe Jesus to be God's Son. (which is accross the line for a Muslim) When the others heard about it, they warned he and I not to tell the Saudi (Mahdi) or he would try to kill Yasser and I , even here in America. Took him and several others to the wildest church I could find the next Sunday.
They may hate Ariel Sharon, but they fear Franklin Graham.
Posted by: Scott   2003-05-14 16:58:02  

#3  Scott: Very interesting, indeed. An anecdote: When I left Saudi in '88 (Jeddah, 6 years), society there was debating satellite dishes. They were still ILLEGAL, however, when I left. Fastforward to '97 and I'm sitting for an interview to work in Riyadh. I ask the guy about the dish situation, and he didn't know what I was talking about. I arrive and they're perfectly legal. TV ads, newspaper ads, shops. Dish, dish, dish!!! What the hell had happened? The Royals and the merchant classes had made a pact with the devil. In exchange for Wahibite cleric permission for dish legalization, the Royals had to open purse strings for the propagation of Wahibite theology on a much more intensive scale than had been done before. "Iqra'a" satellite channel, $ for madrassas world-wide, mosque construction world-wide, etc, recognition of Taliban in Afghanistan. Royals and merchants got to set up networks in London/Rome for direct transmission into Kingdom: ANA, MBC, Orbit,etc. Western influence on one hand and Wahibite repression on the other simultaneously. What a formula!! Wahibites also got their way re domestic education curricula. Look at the result.

Sea change? Maybe, but young smart Royals have to take over and upset the apple cart and have Saudi join 21st century and will have to ruthless and flexible at same time to cope with a force that is ruthless and inflexible. They haven't shown they are capable of doing the job as of yet.

Advantage us: Royals will want to preserve their power and will act in their own interests, which will coincide with ours. They will be less arrogant.

Advantage them: They don't give a damn about human life and will try to take everybody down with them to visit the 72 white raisins.

GBW and smart folks in Muslim world: Patience, audacity, and thinking out of the box are only solutions.

Let's keep our eyes on MEMRI.org for Kingdom's Arabic language press to monitor situation. Anyone who was good at Kremlin-watching will find those skills useful. The 21st century has its first full-fledged crisis on hand. Think in Cold War time terms (50 years is not out of question) as far as when we find out who the winners are.
Posted by: Michael   2003-05-14 16:10:24  

#2  Yeah, you see it from a little different viewpoint when they're trying to blow YOU up...
Posted by: tu3031   2003-05-14 15:41:58  

#1  What an interesting set of articles. Have you guys heard all this before? Could this be the start of a sea change? (I'm not THAT hopeful, I'm just groping for alternatives to killing them all)
Posted by: Scott   2003-05-14 15:07:49  

00:00