| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front |
| Md. Pond May Be Drained in Anthrax Probe |
| 2003-05-12 |
| Maryland pond could be drained after federal agents suggested it may have been the site where anthrax used in a series of mailings in 2001 was assembled or where evidence was dumped. The FBI is considering draining a spring-fed pond that is up to an acre in size and 10 feet deep in Frederick Municipal Forest, Mayor Jennifer P. Dougherty said Sunday.The plan stems from a new FBI theory reported Sunday by The Washington Post that the person behind the attacks could have packed the deadly spores into envelopes under water without being infected or leaving traces on open land. So their latest suspect is the Submariner? The theory is based on evidence recovered from the pond this past winter, the Post reported Sunday, citing anonymous sources close to the investigation. FBI spokeswoman Debra Weierman, contacted Sunday by The Associated Press, declined to comment on the Post report or on searches conducted at a series of ponds in the forest. The attacks nearly 19 months ago killed five people and sickened 13 others. The pond findings offer physical evidence in a case that so far has been built almost exclusively on circumstantial clues, the Post quoted sources as saying. Two sources familiar with the items recovered from one of the ponds described a clear box, with holes that could accommodate gloves to protect the user during work, the Post reported. So-called glove boxes are commonly used to handle dangerous pathogens. Also recovered were vials wrapped in plastic. So the FBI acually found something. For protection against airborne bacteria, a person could put envelopes and secured anthrax powder into the box, then wade into shallow water and submerge it to put the bacteria inside the envelopes, some involved in the case believe, the Post said. Afterward, the envelopes could have been sealed in plastic bags before being removed from the underwater chamber. Other sources told the newspaper the work could have been done on land and the materials discarded in the pond. I'd say dumping it in the pond is more likely. The FBI has said nothing publicly about the material divers recovered during the December and January search missions. Sources close to the case told the Post that the discovery in the ponds was so compelling that the FBI now plans to drain one of the ponds of thousands of gallons of water for a detailed search this summer. Heather Lynch, a spokeswoman for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, declined to comment on that plan Sunday. Dougherty said Sunday that draining the pond was "one of the possibilities." "Obviously, they want to find other evidence, and they think that, as I recall, they want to find other things being hidden by the muck," she said. The search of the ponds was based on a tip, the Post reported. Some investigators said the water theory is the result of the FBI's interest in Steven Hatfill, a physician and bioterrorism expert who formerly worked as a researcher at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick in Frederick. That facility is the primary custodian of the strain of anthrax found in the envelopes sent to the victims. Attorney General John Ashcroft has described Hatfill as "a person of interest" in the investigation. Hatfill formerly lived in an apartment outside Fort Detrick's main gate, about eight miles from the ponds. Hatfill's attorney, Thomas Connolly, called the water theory "far-fetched." He said Hatfill had nothing to do with the anthrax crimes. Interesting. |
| Posted by:Steve |
| #6 Big Suction. Big Screen. Big Pumps. Big Hoses. Lots of Diesel. Hope you find something besides Big Water Source. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2003-05-12 13:29:53 |
| #5 Chuck, obviously the FBI wants to avoid the Iraq connection. I think they have created the theory and refuse to back off in the face of overwhelming facts. |
| Posted by: Douglas De Bono 2003-05-12 12:19:31 |
| #4 good luck draining a spring-fed pond. Gonna need big pumps to compensate for the inflow. Al-Aska Paul is the hydraulics guy here |
| Posted by: Frank G 2003-05-12 11:26:04 |
| #3 You know, the description of how this was supposedly done is SO Rube Goldberg! They might as well have postulated that the perp did it while standing on his head and using scuba gear. It's kinda complicated to handle, but not this complicated. What about the Iraq connection? |
| Posted by: Chuck 2003-05-12 10:59:08 |
| #2 Yes, Steve, omitted that. Tack on 6 mo to a year for the EIS and the van to haul the rather large volumes to text around. Maybe longer if Greenpeace decides to send a rep, heh heh. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2003-05-12 14:08:01 |
| #1 Not to mention how long it's going to take for the envionmental impact statement on draining a wetland. They've had a very wet winter, too. |
| Posted by: Steve 2003-05-12 13:43:56 |