You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Top British spy in IRA flees as papers blow cover
2003-05-11
The British army's top intelligence agent inside the IRA, a suspect in up to 40 murders, was reported to be in hiding after several Sunday newspapers in Ireland and Britain blew his cover. Newspapers said British intelligence services had spirited the man, codenamed "Stakeknife", out of Ireland just hours before the papers published his name. As a double agent, "Stakeknife" served as the head of the Irish Republican Army's internal security unit — known as the "nutting squad". His job was to track down, interrogate, torture and kill suspected informers in the ranks. The man is suspected in up to 40 murders, carried out on both sides of the Irish border with the permission of his British army "handlers" to protect his position within the IRA. A British government spokesman declined to comment on the reports. "We don't comment on security matters," the Northern Ireland Office spokesman said. The Dublin-based Sunday Tribune, one of four newspapers to name the agent, said "Stakeknife" initially approached British military intelligence as a junior IRA volunteer in 1978 wanting revenge for a severe beating he had received from one of the guerrilla group's top Belfast members.
That should certainly make things go better. Who needs intel, when there's a paper to get out?
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#3  What are the chances that this was stage-managed? As in 1) his cover was about to be blown by the Provos anyway, so let it leak and shock/scare those Provos who weren't in on it, or 2) they had gotten everything they could get out of him and keeping him inside wasn't the right strategy anymore, or 3) having it leak causes the Provos to do something really stupid (reveal an operation, blow another source, blow a double, etc.) that is more useful than keeping him in.

Just food for thought. Brits are very smart intel players; while it's possible that the newspapers actually did the work on their own, it could be a managed leak designed to make something else happen.
Posted by: Steve White   2003-05-11 23:21:53  

#2  They still have the Official Secrets Act over there, don't they? If ever a case called for a prosecution it's this one -- newspapers deliberately taking out an active intelligence source.
Posted by: Ray   2003-05-11 21:28:30  

#1  Well, except 40 seems a little bit excessive. Wonder if they used him to take out the more incorrigible of the IRA hard boys from within?
Posted by: Frank G   2003-05-11 15:09:39  

00:00