| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Korea | |
| KCNA urges U.S. to properly understand DPRK | |
| 2003-04-30 | |
| They're in lecture mode today... The bellicose forces of the Bush administration, referring to the DPRK's "nuclear issue," are now blustering that the U.S. will not recognize the system in the DPRK and it will not offer reward to the DPRK. No food for you! This can not be construed otherwise than ridiculous jargons of political imbeciles. These silly remarks only go to clearly prove that U.S. policy-makers are totally ignorant of the DPRK. Well, we know you're maniacs. We know you're insane. What else is there? The DPRK urged the U.S. to assure it of non-aggression and drop a hostile policy toward Pyongyang out of its good faith and magnanimity not prompted by its wish to have its system recognized by the U.S. or to get any reward. We're good guys. Really, we are. Trust us. We wouldn't screw you over. By the way, could you swing through the drive thru and pick up some burgers for 5 million people? We'll give you the money when you get here. Really. In the mid-1990s the DPRK adopted the DPRK-U.S. Agreed Framework at the negotiations with the U.S. in which it committed itself to fulfil its political, moral and legal duties to remove the root cause of long-standing mistrust, confrontation and misunderstanding between the two countries and normalize the bilateral relations. It was a crucial measure taken by the DPRK out of magnanimity. Well, there's a new sheriff in town and he's not like the pussies you were dealing with in the mid-90's. I suggest you get that idea embedded in your head. Had the DPRK policy-makers of the Bush administration been far-sighted, they would not have missed this historic opportunity but opted for improving the relations with the DPRK for the future of the U.S. However, no sooner had the Bush administration taken office than it went so arrogant as to adopt it as its policy to pursue a hostile policy toward the DPRK and demand the DPRK scrap "its nuclear program before dialogue" after terming it part of "an axis of evil." It has talked much about a sort of reward in a bid to mislead the public opinion. The U.S. DPRK policy-makers should confess to being greenhorns. The "greenhorns" have already taken down two countries that were threats to this country. Remember that. And you're on the list in case you didn't know.. The political system in the DPRK is a man-centered socialist system chosen by its people themselves and valued by them as their life and soul. Invincible is the Korean-style socialist system in which the leader, the army and people form a harmonious whole. ...as opposed to a glowing, radioactive hole. The DPRK has not only the great single-hearted unity but the national defence capacity strong enough to repel the U.S. aggression at one swoop. There is no need for the DPRK to have its system recognized by the other as it represents the will of its people and is supported by the Songun political mode. They should know this before anything else. Hey, if you want to keep your Looney Tunes system, fine. You just keep those nukes in your pocket. The American hawks are well-advised to ponder over the grave consequences to be entailed by its confrontation with the DPRK before making any analysis. We've pondered it and concenus is... you people are f**ked up big time.
| |
| Posted by:tu3031 |
| #7 Even in Korean, it's hard to tell what the f*ck they're saying half the time. You know, if they promised to feed me something other than tree bark, I'd be more than willing to do their translation work myself. Figure save the guys at State and CIA the grief. BTW, watch how many times they use the word "greenhorn" in the next few weeks. I have a feeling it's their colloquialism of the month. |
| Posted by: The Marmot 2003-04-30 14:55:49 |
| #6 *holds up card* 8.3 ...drop a hostile policy toward Pyongyang out of its good faith and magnanimity not prompted by its wish to have its system recognized by the U.S. or to get any reward. Style points missed due to clear grammatical error. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2003-04-30 14:26:21 |
| #5 First, does anyone have any guesses as to which automated translator the KCNA is using to translate these "articles" into English? (So that I can avoid it in the future) Second, does anyone want to speculate which language they're translating the original Korean into, before the final translation to English? I'm suspecting either Aleut, Sanskrit, Esperanto, or Fuddlish... |
| Posted by: snellenr 2003-04-30 10:17:09 |
| #4 I'm knucklehead of the day. Thanks for fixing it |
| Posted by: tu3031 2003-04-30 09:42:14 |
| #3 Damn yes! how the heck can I score the Korean performance when you're in the way, tu? ;)! JK! |
| Posted by: Ptah 2003-04-30 08:54:09 |
| #2 Put the cap back on that highlighter before it dries out! Other people have to use it, too, you know! :-) |
| Posted by: Dar 2003-04-30 08:40:11 |
| #1 Whoa! What happened here? HELP! |
| Posted by: tu3031 2003-04-30 08:34:42 |