You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Government moves to split MMA
2003-04-18
Increased pressure by Mutahidda Majlis-e-Amal, the six-party religious alliance, to force General Pervez Musharraf to step down as army chief has got the government to launch efforts to split the MMA by exploiting the cracks between the Jama’at-e Islami and Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam, the two largest component parties in the alliance. After failing to leash the JI and its vaulting Amir, Qazi Hussein Ahmed, the government has now turned its attention towards JUI of Maulana Fazlur Rehman, which, according to well-placed sources, has indicated to be more amenable on the issue of General Musharraf’s position as army chief.
Fazlur Rehman is known as Mullah Diesel in Pakistan, because of the alleged money he made on smuggling petrol through Pakistan back in 1993 when he was in the government of Benazir Bhutto. As you can tell from his obese appearance, he is a man with a taste for the finer things in life, and is probably much easier to buy off than the more fanatical Qazi.
Qazi's nearly as porky, his purchase price is just higher. He wants to be khalif...
“The JUI has agreed to give [General] Musharraf a timeframe, about two years, to step down as army chief; the JI has put his immediate resignation as a precondition for accepting the LFO,” says a top official. The LFO is the package of amendments General Musharraf made through various ordinances and executive orders in the run-up to the October elections and the transition to democracy through the polls. The alliance, which came into being on January 2, 2002, has not been without friction. But the parties — primarily JI and JUI — have stuck together because of the Alliance’s political impact and the need to keep the vote-bank intact. “It would have been easy to split them if they hadn’t done so well in the elections. That they have, makes it more difficult,” concedes an official.
The ISI succesfully split both the Pakistan Muslim League and Pakistan People's Party, Pakistan's two mainstream partys, leaving the elections wide open for the Army's PML-Q puppets, and the MMA fanatics. And that result was no accident, at least until Qazi decided not to play ball.
Clearly, any component party would like to weigh the benefit of staying within the Alliance with any perceived advantage of opting out or taking a unilateral course. “The split in MMA will remain a pipedream, though it is true they [the government] are trying to divide us,” Qari Mohammad Usman, a JUI leader, told TFT. Asked whether the JUI was ready to give a timeframe to General Musharraf to step down as army chief, Qari Usman said: “The issue has come up in the meeting with the PML(Q) and we are still awaiting the government’s reply. We want to know how much time Musharraf wants and why,” he said. For its part, in one of the recent MMA meetings, the JI has shown itself to be relentless on the issue and wants the alliance to launch an anti-Musharraf campaign.
Perv's moves to enforce some standards of honesty and competence in members of the National Assembly are anathema to organizations that draw their power from ignorance and graft. Qazi's nightmare is a secular state run with even modest efficiency. Splitting Perv off from the Army — where he still has power — would leave him without any base. He could be quarantined and end his days a figurehead while the Mullahs actually ran things...
The JI’s view is that while they are ready to support Musharraf as president, they will not allow him to continue in the role of army chief. Sources say the party’s stance is also owed to General Musharraf’s liberal policies.
I have wondered just who backs who when it concerns the Mullahs, the JUI was always close to the army and worked with them on the Kashmir Jihad and the Taliban project, whereas the JI is more ideological, and although they have historically also worked with the army, they aren't as corrupt. I have a feeling that Hamid Gul might be siding with the later, and the two of them are trying to bring to power a more Islamist general.
I think that's a real accurate assessment. But keep in mind that Qazi and JI were Hekmatyar's patrons in the Soviet war and that they were soul-mates to the Talibs. They regarded the Talibs' Afghanistan as the prototype of the New Pakland...
But while the JUI apparently supports the JI’s stance, it has shown interest in the signals emanating from the presidency. Some observers are quite confident that were the government to play its cards right, the JUI could support the move to give General Musharraf at least another two years to continue as army chief. At least one analyst thinks that such a support from JUI might not end up splitting the MMA. “If the JUI accepts a compromise formula, the JI will have to make a decision about the MMA’s future. I don’t think they would like to damage the Alliance. There is too much political capital tied in with its perpetuation,” he says, adding: “In fact, the two parties might well be playing the game together, one presenting the tough face, the other the softer side.”
The "softer side" of hard-line Islamism is an interesting concept...
Basically, some intelligence agencies want to exploit the “differences” within the MMA, which first emerged on the issue of seat allocations before the elections and later during the formation of governments in the NWFP and Balochistan and the nomination of Leader of the Opposition. Meanwhile, some ground has already been covered in the PML(Q)-MMA negotiations. The MMA, which initially would have none of the LFO, has now come round to accepting the amendments package if General Musharraf were to step down as army chief.
'Nother words, they'll take the LFO if Perv will agree to set up the conditions for ditching it later. That's subtle...
Some PML(Q) leaders think that is no mean achievement. The PML(Q) president, Ch. Shujaat Hussain, recently met with General Musharraf and indicated the MMA is ready to drop resistance to the LFO provided General Musharraf would leave the post of army chief. The General has apparently rejected the idea and asked the government to take on the Alliance even if it means giving concessions to the JUI.
Proving Perv's no fool. He can play the game just as well as Qazi and probably better than Fazl...
“If some kind of understanding is reached between the JUI and [General] Musharraf, the party may be given a major share in the government, including some of those ministries presently with the Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians Patriots, PPPPP. Interestingly, the stock of PPPPP-wallahs is likely to plummet if Shujaat Hussain could pull off this coup,” says an analyst. Sources say while the JI now wants the “million march” formula to now be used as a platform for an anti-Musharraf campaign, the JUI is opposed to it at this stage.
Qazi gets his jollies from firing up large crowds of shrieking turbans...
Some sources say General Musharraf may soon invite the JUI chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman for a meeting if he is told the JUI is prepared to bite. But there is one quarter which might oppose the party’s decision to play ball with General Musharraf: the emotionally charged workers, most of whom have also fought in Afghanistan and are generally considered rabidly anti-US and anti-liberal. Many of them have also been traumatised by General Musharraf’s decision to suddenly change tack and drop the jihad and the jihadis like hot potatoes.
I think we can all rest assured that if it's happening at all, it's a temporary measure. They're throwing al-Qaeda bones our way, but they're leaving the indigenous jihadis alone.
However, some observers think that may not pose a major problem if the party can sell the line that it has ended up getting a good deal by going along with the General.
It's hard to be "pragmatic" when the rubes who voted for you actually expect you to follow up on your promises.
Within the MMA, the JI has the support of the Barelvi Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Pakistan of Maulana Shah Ahmed Noorani. Noorani has also spoken out against the General describing him as a “mudhosh” (inebriated) army chief who must be replaced by a “hoshwala” (sober) chief. Never before has the MMA top brass used such language against the General. Interestingly, some sources say the JI might be taking its cue from some former army generals who are opposed to General Musharraf’s policies and want the MMA leadership to speed up their campaign against the General and continue with their million-march strategy.
Games within games... The general-wallahs want the fundo-wallahs to overthrow the current strongman, so they can step in and "restore order" and somebody else can get to be the strongman. At which point an entirely new set of alliances and counteralliances is in order. Do you get the impression these people have nothing better to do? The Pak army's never won a war, and the politicians have never actually governed...
Observers believe that if the government fails to reach an understanding with the MMA or, alternately, split it the political climate could become hot. “The ruling PML will make another attempt to come to an agreement with the MMA over the LFO. If it fails, [General] Musharraf will be forced to take some ‘decisive decisions’,” says an insider.
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#7  Anon; the political parties aren't like the ones in the West, the MQM has been lead by the same leader for a couple decades, the PPP has been led by the Bhuttos for 30 years, and since there is no internal democracy or any chance or removing leaders from "their" political parties, it can be very easy to offer some money to some senior politicians and give them a promise of being a major player in the next government, as opposed to haveing to spend their next however many years outside of government because the Army won't let your party form government, and your exiled leaders refuse to compromise because they have a personal vendetta with the generals.
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2003-04-18 18:23:32  

#6  How do you engineer a split in an opposing political party? Is it as simple as funding a Ralph Nader (or Perot) candidate or is there something more involved?
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-04-18 11:44:20  

#5  Paul Moloney,
Thanks for that very detailed explanation. The place is a bigger shithole than even I could have imagined.
Remember the big Hoo-Haa everyone made when Saddam had that farce of a Presidential Referendum. Yet nobody made a big fuss When Perv had an equally farcical referendum, nobody except the EU who claimed that it had been rigged. Perhaps you'll all understand why the US is loosing credibility with most Indians especially when it comes to Pakland.
Posted by: rg117   2003-04-18 10:04:01  

#4  I will try to explain the current political situation in Pakistan as best as I can:
The major conservative political party in the country, the Pakistan Muslim League (PML), lead by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (Overthrown by General Musharaf in 1999), was opposed to the Army after the coup, but the ISI were able to engineer a split in the party that lead to a majority of it's members defecting to the pro army PML-Q faction which now forms the Pakistani government. However the remnants of the PML that are still loyal to Nawaz Sharif also have some seats left. Sharif is currently in exile in Saudi Arabia and can not return because he is wanted for Hijacking and corruption charges.
The only left leaning, liberal party in the country, the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) lead by former PM Benazir Bhutto, has been against the military and the Mullahs for decades ever since her father was overthrown and exectured by General Zia ul Haq in the 70s. She is currently in exile in London, and the ISI were able to engineer a split in the party to create the PPPP faction to support the PML-Q government.
Another political party that used to be a major player in the Karachi area was the MQM, which was composed of Indian Muslims who moved to Pakistan at partitian. It was historically opposed to the Army and the establishment, but the ISI were able to engineer a split between Immigrants from different regions of India, and the ensuing conflict between the MQM and the ISI backed 'Real-MQM' lead to thousands of deaths and turned Karachi into a blood bath for much of the nineties. Since then, the MQM's entire energies have been devoted to freeing it's activits from gaol and reclaiming it's territory from the rival faction, and as a result, it's former supporters have become disenchanted with it and have left it in droves. It's leader is also in exile and the Army wants to try him for murder.

The end result of all this, is that the Pakistni Army/ISI has managed to decapitate and fracture every major political party in the country, with the exception of the radical Islamists, who were brought together into a single bloc and all the criminal cases against their leaders dropped, and the other limitations placed on the other major parties in the country were not applied to them. This has had the result that the government is made up of opportunists of various types with no ideology or support base, and the only credible opposition is the MMA, of Qazi, Fasl, Sami and the rest. This was then used by Musharaf and the other Generals to further pressure America do provide further support because they were "all that stands before the Mullahs getting hold of Pakistan's nukes".
This has been going relatvily well, however, of late it seems some of the less "pragmatic" Army officers and Islamists have begun to become angry and the toning down of the Jihad in Kashmir, and the cooperation with the FBI. Although, as suggested in the article, this split could also be exaggerated in order to make the "good cop, bad cop" game the Pakistan's are playing seem more credible, and I doubt anyone really knows for sure what is the truth.
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2003-04-18 09:39:16  

#3  "General Musharraf claims to be an all-powerful president on the basis of last year’s “presidential referendum” and the Legal Framework Order (LFO) under which 29 constitutional amendments were unilaterally framed, general elections were held and current parliaments constituted. Not so, protests the strong opposition comprising the MMA, PPPP and PMLN. Their argument is that General Musharraf must be elected president by parliament; that he cannot remain the army chief; and that some of his powers (especially those related to the sacking of the cabinet and parliament) obtained via the National Security Council must be curtailed. The net result is that, six months after coming into being, parliament is still unable to function. Under the constitution, the president must address a joint session of parliament after the general elections and at the beginning of each year. But the opposition is bent upon physically obstructing General Musharraf from addressing parliament because it doesn’t accept him as a legitimate president and it doesn’t consider his LFO to be a legitimate umbrella for his absolutist powers."
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2003-04-18 09:19:13  

#2  I thought PML-Q + PPP breakaways (PPPPP?!) had majority - does Perv need more to pass his constitutional "reforms"? Or a break in MMA to gain greater control at province level? Qucik review of Pakland situation needed - but this article is good start.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-04-18 08:27:47  

#1  "General Musharraf claims to be an all-powerful president on the basis of last year’s “presidential referendum” and the Legal Framework Order (LFO) under which 29 constitutional amendments were unilaterally framed, general elections were held and current parliaments constituted. Not so, protests the strong opposition comprising the MMA, PPPP and PMLN. Their argument is that General Musharraf must be elected president by parliament; that he cannot remain the army chief; and that some of his powers (especially those related to the sacking of the cabinet and parliament) obtained via the National Security Council must be curtailed. The net result is that, six months after coming into being, parliament is still unable to function. Under the constitution, the president must address a joint session of parliament after the general elections and at the beginning of each year. But the opposition is bent upon physically obstructing General Musharraf from addressing parliament because it doesn’t accept him as a legitimate president and it doesn’t consider his LFO to be a legitimate umbrella for his absolutist powers."
Posted by: Paul Moloney   4/18/2003 9:19:13 AM  

00:00