You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
With "Friends" Like These
2003-03-27
Excerpt from long article on MSNBC/Time. Go read it.
A surprise Perry Mason-type maneuver in an Idaho courtroom has put the spotlight on an increasingly sensitive problem facing federal prosecutors in the war on terror: a battalion of defense lawyers working hand in glove with the Saudi Arabian government. Ever since the 9-11 attacks, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Saudi Embassy in Washington has been providing top-flight defense lawyers free of charge for any Saudi citizen detained as part of the Justice Department’s crackdown on suspected terrorists. “That has been the policy since day one,” said Muddassir H. Siddiqui, the former chief counsel for the Saudi Embassy. He said he personally arranged for defense lawyers for “hundreds” of Saudi suspects detained by federal agents after the 9-11 attacks. Siddiqui, who left the embassy last year, said the unusual Saudi legal-defense program was ordered by Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the veteran Saudi ambassador to the United States, based on instructions sent from Riyadh immediately after the attacks. Siddiqui insists that Bandar also directed Saudi officials and the defense lawyers they hired to “cooperate” with the Justice Department on terror-related investigations. But that contention is now being questioned at high levels of the Justice Department. In a growing number of recent cases, FBI agents are intensely investigating suspected links between Saudi nationals in the U.S. and Al Qaeda as well as other international terrorist groups. The growing awareness that the Saudi Embassy is providing targets of the Justice Department probes with free lawyers has infuriated some officials. “I find it amazing,” said one senior federal law-enforcement official. “It’s outrageous, really. If they were a corporation and doing the same thing, I think we would have to think about whether to charge them. It certainly doesn’t sound like cooperation.”
If you are paying for the lawyers, you can keep the defendents from making a deal and telling federal prosecutors what they know. Also, I believe that before you go to trial, the prosecutors have to tell the defense what the evidence against them is. Bet that gets passed back to Saudi as well.
Posted by:Steve

#4  Since when do Non-Citizens receive citizens rights? Are these people United States Citizens? I don't think so. They shouldn't be allowed to have trial lawyers, this is OUR country, not THEIRS. Ridiculous. Saudi Arabia is a DANGEROUS Country.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-04-05 11:11:54  

#3  The Saudis will go to any lengths to support jihadis. It is of the utmost urgency that the Salafist' "al-Huda" school system, which is targeting the DC area, be padlocked. They are paid for by King Fahd's al-Qaeda funding, "Holyland Foundation" (al-Haramain), and are poisoning student minds with genocidal khutbah. (www.khutbah.com) Bill of Rights protections of exercise of freedom of religion, cannot be legitimately invoked to defend this brazen incitement to murder.

Ask yourself: what kind of country do I want, and what should be done to preserve it? You can make a difference.
Posted by: Anonon   2003-03-27 12:33:58  

#2  Why we're granting due process to Saudi nationals (i.e., non citizens) is beyond me. It would be nice to get information from them, but otherwise I'm inclined to kick all the jihadi wannabees the hell out of here.
Posted by: Raj   2003-03-27 09:55:07  

#1  Unfortunately, the Saudis are playing by the rules. It would be playing by the rules as well, to publish the names of these law firms that have been retained and to make them public-relations pariahs, for putting their almighty bucks ahead of national interests. I know, they would 'yadda yadda' about doing their constitutional duties to provide the best defense, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be held up for public scorn....if they start to lose a lot of their other lucrative clients due to embarrassment over being tied to Al-Qaeda-defending aholes, they might rethink their client-acceptance criteria. All it would take is for another Saudi-led attack for us to have a complete melt-down with these f*&kers
Posted by: Frank G   2003-03-27 09:54:01  

00:00