Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front | |
One million. And still they came | |
2003-02-16 | |
This article rambles on in a try-hard poetic way so I've kept the most pertinant facts and cut the dribble It was the biggest public demonstration ever held in Britain, surpassing every one of the organisers' wildest expectations and Tony Blair's worst fears, and it will be remembered for These people need to be taught the difference between appeasement and peace, and the difference between supporting peace and supporting a bloody dictator. One group of SWP stalwarts were joined, for the first march in any of their histories, by their mothers. There were country folk and lecturers, dentists and poulterers, a hairdresser from Cardiff and a poet from Cheltenham. I repeat: Bush should start the war without delay, get it over and done with quickly and the administration should keep their collective mouths shut about possible tactics like 'shock and awe' or nuclear bunker-busters, it is only making the opposition worse. There were cheers as marchers were given updates about turnout elsewhere in the world - 90,000 in Glasgow, two million on the streets of Rome. 'I'm not political, not at all. I don't even watch the news,' said Alvina Desir,
Andrew Miller, 33, from New Zealand, whose feeling, echoed by all around, was that 'all the different groups that are marching today show the world that the West is not the enemy, that British people do not hate Islam and Arabs and the coming together of people is the greatest way forward.' Unfortunately for us, Mr Miller, the Islamic Jihadists don't care that you don't hate Islam or Arabs. You are not one of them therefore they hate you. Do you get it? Are you ready to teach your mother to wear a burqa? Lesley Taylor, a constitutional law lecturer who's lived across here for 29 years, holding a forlorn placard reading 'American against the war.' Why only one? 'I don't know any other Americans here. In the Eighties here I saw a lot of anti-American resentment, and now it's back. I accept that the perception of George W. Bush has something to do with this, but still... these are the same people the thinking middle-classes, who were so shocked and honestly sympathetic after September 11: how can they turn so nasty so quickly? Because the media has indoctrinated them with anti-Americanism and brainwashed them into thinking appeasement is a solution 'Because America is making your Prime Minister go against the huge majority of the British people. And that won't be forgiven. Look about you. That's what this is about; not fierce party politics but a simple feeling that democracy, British democracy, has been forgotten.' Chris Wall, a Nottingham mother who had brought down eight children with her: 'They In Hyde Park itself, a long line of purple silk lay on the grass, facing Mecca, and Muslims took off their shoes to pray. What a surprise, get used to it people. Mo Mowlam warned: 'We will lose this war. It will be the best recruiting campaign for terrorists that there could be. They will hate us even more.' They hate us anyway. Will yesterday, astonishing yesterday, change anything? I hope not. | |
Posted by:Anonymous |
#6 Hope you don't mind, Mojo - I'm going to add that to the title bar mottos. It'll replace "54-40 or fight!" until Cretien cheeses me off again... |
Posted by: Fred 2003-02-16 22:18:11 |
#5 Let them hate so long as they fear. (Oderint Dum Metuant) -- Lucius Accius |
Posted by: mojo 2003-02-16 21:08:30 |
#4 Those of us that have thought the issues through know why war is inevitable. And then there are those who think that warm bodies alone can resolve the issues. When those warm bodies turn cold, the war will be over. |
Posted by: john 2003-02-16 14:47:49 |
#3 Gonzo, Saddam finances Palestinian terrorism by providing checks to the relatives of bombers. Removing Saddam will reduce the incentives for Palestinian terrorists...thus inching that problem closer to solution. |
Posted by: Arthur 2003-02-16 12:00:58 |
#2 The bold strap-line for this event was "FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE". Always on view when the BBC filmed speakers on the podium. What on earth has Sammy's chemical kitchen got to do with freedom for the non-existent "Palestine". At least Arafat is showing that he has not lost all his marbles and intends to appoint a Prime Minister. Some misguided Britons see some link between Iraq and the Palestinian Authority's cause. Aside from lack of democracy and a penchant for uncivilised behaviour to neighbouring countries I see no link. |
Posted by: gonzo 2003-02-16 11:20:23 |
#1 'I'm not political, not at all. I don't even watch the news,' said Alvina Desir, queuing on the Embankment for the start of the march at noon. She's entitled to an opinion, but it illustrates the degree of independent, logical, and critical reasoning many of these people have bothered to do before jumping on the bandwagon. If this was a demonstration you supported, wouldn't you feel a bit embarrassed if one of your fellow marchers came out with a quote like that? Seems like ignorance was something to be proud of yesterday. On a TV debate I've just seen (Dimbleby debate, ITV1, UK) an exiled Iraqi told how most of his leaflets appealing for the marchers in London to remember Saddam's human right abuses were thrown back at him with the retort: "this isn't about Saddam Hussein, it's about the US." Although he himself didn't want a war, at least the poor guy has a clearer idea of who his friends are now. |
Posted by: Bulldog 2003-02-16 10:20:59 |