You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Axis of Evil
Saddam Says Troops Unbeatable, if Well Supplied
2003-01-08
The American GI's 21st-century kit will count for nothing, says President Saddam Hussein, against the Iraqi infantryman armed with a rifle, God's blessing -- and local villagers ready to feed him on the battlefield. But with rations tight, supplying the troops with food could be a real concern, he was quoted as conceding Wednesday. In remarks carried by Iraqi state television, the president told militia commanders the United States had superiority in the air but it would be a different story in face to face fighting.
"In aerial combat, there is a difference in weapons. But on the ground and on foot, men fight with their rifles," he said in his latest defiant salvo against the U.S. military build-up.
Ok, it's official, he is living in a dream world.
Saddam painted a picture of combat ranging across the Iraqi countryside and his troops relying for food on the local population rather than military logistics. But since the army was evicted from Kuwait by a U.S.-led coalition in the 1991 Gulf War, food has been rationed in Iraq as a result of United Nations trade sanctions that are still in place. Feeding the soldiery was now a concern, Saddam said.
"It is enough to have grenades, launchers, a loaf of bread, a drink of water and a rifle. Then, counting on God, Iraq will be safe and I don't see any difficulties in the battle -- unless the fighter says he has no bread or no water to drink.
"I have to see if he can depend on his brothers in villages round about to get from them a loaf of bread to go on fighting among them. This is the only thing that I find difficult."
"A loaf of bread, a jug of water, and thou, my white flag"
The authorities have distributed a three-month ration to every family to stock up food in their houses in case of war. More reserve rations are expected to be handed out soon.
Five weeks of bombing campaign in 1991 let the coalition drive the Iraqi ground troops from Kuwait in a matter of hours.
This time around, the Americans and their allies should be even better equipped in terms of the kind of infantry firepower, fighting vehicles, body armor, night-vision kit and so on they can bring to bear on Iraqi troops wielding familiar Kalashnikov rifles, machineguns and rocket-propelled grenade launchers.
Heh, heh, heh.
Saddam, however, appealed to his troops pride in traditions symbolized by the traditional Arab shemagh headdress:
"Every one of us will put on his shemagh, with his rifle in his hand, and with it the enemy will be defeated."
Up your shemagh!
Posted by:Steve

#5  Perfect. Why not then turn them against Sammy himself. After some de-brainwashing I'm sure many would want to be "liberators" of their own country.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-01-10 04:22:14  

#4  They want to swamp our troops with mass Iraqi surrenders again to slow up any advance. A captured Iraqi soldier used that way could be considered an asset by a demented tactician with dillusions of granduer.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-01-09 09:50:16  

#3  Ramon: you're absolutely right. The key question is whether the Iraqi people will fight WITH Saddam or against him. I'll bet in the beginning they will be apprehensive, but once they see that Saddam's propaganda isn't fulfilling itself, it's game over for Sammy. Of course there will always be spoilers around after the dust settles, but something tells me the Iraqi people will do just fine. Unlike N Korea, these people are not brain-washed.
Posted by: RW   2003-01-08 21:23:26  

#2  Ken Pollock, in the "Threatening Storm," describes in great detail the level of delusion that Saddam has. Frankly, Saddam could be called the "Great Miscalculator." His intel sucks, no one in their right mind would ever think to give him hard truths: killing messengers is a tradition in his regime.

Ultimately, Saddam's primary calculation, all evidence to the contrary, is that Americans won't have the stomach to slug it out with Iraq and face thousands of returning body bags. Trouble is (for him), it won't work that way. The campaign will be very fast and we're not going to relent no matter what the cost, which is not likely to be horrific (though we will lose people, which sucks.)

The ONLY hope he has, militarily, is that the Iraqi people will support guerrilla warfare against us. If they do, it's going to be a lot tougher to finish this job. If they don't, and they have plenty of reasons to see Saddam and his goon regime finished, it'll be over fast. And speed is the key, along with minimizing civilian losses, which we will do. Saddam has a "traditional" army in more ways than one. If that's essentially all we have to deal with he's gone in less than two months of fighting...maybe less...
Posted by: Ramon McLeod   2003-01-08 16:46:28  

#1  There must be a lot of hashish smuggling in Iraq, Saddam's gotta be stoned to say something this stupid...
Posted by: Raj   2003-01-08 15:55:01  

00:00