| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| MJC Threatens To Initiate Jihad in India |
| 2002-07-26 |
| Mutahidda Jihad Council (MJC), a conglomerate of 15 Jihadi organisations fighting Indian rule in occupied Kashmir, on Thursday warned New Delhi to stop its oppression in Held Kashmir, otherwise Jihadis would widen their struggle to India. "Can't get a war going between Pak and India any other way, guess we'll try it this way..." ''Freedom fighters would launch the Jihad in India as a revenge, if New Delhi don’t stop its brutalities and atrocities against the innocent people in the Occupied Kashmir,'' vowed Syed Salahuddin, chief of MJC. Salahuddin said that India would have to pay a heavy price, if it harms any Kashmir leader, currently languishing in Indian prison cells. That's cuz revenge is one of the central tenets of Islam. It sez so right in the Koran someplace. You could look it up. Salahuddin, who is also amir of Hizbul Mujahideen, was of the view that he believed that Pakistan could not think about compromising on Kashmir issue. ''India has never recognised Pakistan from the core of its heart and Kashmir freedom movement is Pakistan’s first defence line and if this line breaks then Islamabad will have to fight this war inside its territory,'' he warned. He's probably right. Deep down, I think India regards Pakistan as its low-rent district, where they put the goofs when the Brits left. That's gotta hurt the Paks' misplaced pride, especially since the Indos are right... Responding to another question, he claimed that freedom fighters have enough technology and weaponry to fight the war against India for a long time.''Kashmiris have an easy access of supply of arms even from the Indian side and other areas,'' he continued. All it takes is a pot full of money, and Soddy Arabia's got lotsa that... About forthcoming Indian-sponsored elections in the Held Valley, he said that Kashmiris had outrightly rejected the election ''drama'' by New Delhi, saying such polls cannot be a substitute to plebiscite. ''The solution of this long-standing and lingering lies in the implementation of the United Nations resolutions or through tripartite talks among Pakistan, India and Kashmiri representatives,'' he pointed out. Actually, the Indos should go ahead and hold the plebiscite. Get the damned thing out of the way, whichever way it falls. If the Kashmiris want to be part of Pakland, that's their tough luck. If they want to be part of India, then India will probably have to fight a war with the Paks to enforce it, but they'll be able to point with pride, etc., etc. And if the Kashmiris want to be independent, let 'em. The "tripartite talks" idea is pretty crummy, because deciding who the Kashmiri representatives would be would set off yet another war. |
| Posted by:Fred Pruitt |
| #1 Anyone ever notice who controls the upper third of Kashmir? China does. Funny how no one is even trying to talk them out of their illegal occupation. Based on what Ive heard from my Pakistani tech breatheren, if you held a plebecite in pakistan right now and allowed expats to vote, they would go back to being a part of india. Funny how no matter where you go in the world, muslims have more protection and ability to thrive in non-muslim countries than they do in countries controlled by their own religion. |
| Posted by: frank martin 2002-07-26 12:05:33 |