You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
FBI: Agents Advised Berg to Leave Iraq
2004-05-13
Long but so far the best description of what Berg was doing, reasonable timeline included.
U.S. authorities said Wednesday a young American who was beheaded by militants had been warned by the FBI to leave Iraq and was offered a plane ride to safety at a time when a new wave of violence spread across the country, making road travel extremely dangerous. Mystery surrounded not only Nicholas Berg's disappearance but also why he had been held by Iraqi police for about two weeks and questioned by FBI agents three times. Berg's family disputed U.S. officials' claims that Berg was never in U.S. custody. "The Iraqi police do not tell the FBI what to do, the FBI tells the Iraqi police what to do. Who do they think they're kidding?" Berg's father, Michael, told The Associated Press from his home in West Chester, Pa., a Philadelphia suburb. Berg was last in contact with U.S. officials in Baghdad on April 10, and his body was found Saturday in Baghdad. Staff members at the $30-a-night Al-Fanar Hotel in Baghdad told the AP that Berg stayed there for several days until April 10. Two e-mails sent by Berg to his family and friends show the 26-year-old telecommunications expert traveled widely and unguarded throughout Iraq - an unsafe practice rarely done by Westerners. The FBI warned Berg shortly before his disappearance that Iraq was too volatile a place for unprotected American civilians but he turned down a State Department offer to fly him home, U.S. officials said Wednesday. Michael Berg said his son refused a U.S. offer in early April to board an outbound charter jet because he believed travel to the airport was too dangerous. American soldiers refer to the airport highway as "RPG Alley" because of frequent attacks by insurgents firing rocket-propelled grenades.
But driving to Jordan or Kuwait is safer?
According to the State Department, Berg told an American diplomat in Baghdad that he preferred to travel on his own to Kuwait. "At that time, the U.S. consular officer extended an offer to assist Mr. Berg to depart Iraq by plane to Jordan," said State Department spokeswoman Kelly Shannon. "We'd already discussed that possibility with his family, and we mentioned that to him, obviously, when we talked to him on the 10th." Berg first worked in Iraq in December and January and returned in March. He was inspecting communications facilities, some of which were destroyed in the war or by looters. During his time in Iraq, he struggled with the Arabic language and worked at night on a tower in Abu Ghraib.
Oh really?
Michael Berg told the AP that Nicholas' paternal aunt, now dead, married an Iraqi man named Mudafer, who became close to Nicholas. In one of the e-mails, Nicholas Berg describes going to the northern city of Mosul, where he introduced himself to Mudafer's brother, identified as Moffak Mustaffa. "We got along splendidly," Berg wrote. "We spent a few hours and I helped him establish an e-mail account." Berg notes that "my presence ... made him more concerned (about his own safety and probably mine too) than I've been the entire time I've been here."
Oh really? Wonder if Moffak set him up?
U.S. spokesmen Dan Senor and Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt were quick to offer statements of condolence to his family and to draw attention to the barbarity of his death. owever, Senor said Iraqi police arrested Berg in Mosul on March 24 because local authorities believed he may have been involved in "suspicious activities."
Being associated with telecom in that part of the world might be considered that.
Senor refused to say more, citing the sensitivity of the case. But he did confirm that the Americans were aware Berg was in custody. "U.S. authorities were notified," he said. "The FBI visited Mr. Berg on three occasions and determined that he was not involved with any criminal or terrorist activity."
So why ask the Iraqis to spring him? And why three visits?
In a statement, the FBI said that its agents "encouraged him to accept (the) ... offer to facilitate his safe passage out of Iraq. Mr. Berg refused these offers." Berg was released April 6 and checked into the Baghdad hotel. Senor referred questions about the reason for Berg's detention to the Iraqi police. In Mosul, however, police told the AP they had no knowledge of the Berg case. Police official Safwan Talal said the only American arrested there in recent months was a woman who was released soon afterward.
"We can say no more, effendi!"
Berg told his family that U.S. officials took custody of him soon after his arrest and he was not allowed to make phone calls or contact a lawyer, his father said. Kimmitt said U.S. forces kept tabs on Berg during his confinement to make sure he was being fed and properly treated because "he was an American citizen." But the three FBI visits suggest American authorities were concerned about more than Berg's well-being. They may have had their own suspicions about what the young American was doing in Iraq. During a briefing Wednesday, Senor confirmed that Berg had registered with the U.S. Consulate in Baghdad but insisted he "was not a U.S. government employee, he has no affiliation with the coalition and to our knowledge he has no affiliation with any Coalition Provisional Authority contractor." He also stated that Berg "was at no time under the jurisdiction or detention of coalition forces." However, in a Jan. 18 e-mail, Berg said his company had been announced as an approved subcontractor for a broadcast consortium awarded a contract for the U.S.-controlled Iraqi Media Network. "Practically, this means we should be involved with quite a bit of tower work as part of the reconstruction, repair and new construction of the Iraqi Media Network," he wrote, referring to the network as "something like NPR in the U.S." It was unclear whether the contract was revoked.

FBI agents visited Berg's parents March 31 and told the family they were trying to confirm their son's identity. On April 5, the Bergs sued the government in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, contending that their son was being held illegally. The Bergs claimed the State Department told them their son "is currently detained in Mosul, Iraq, by the United States military" and that American diplomats "no longer" had "any authority or power to intervene" on his behalf. Berg was released the day after the lawsuit was filed. His family said he told them he had not been mistreated. They did not hear from him after April 9 - when violence flared in Iraq because of the U.S. Marine siege of Fallujah and a Shiite uprising in the south. Several days later, however, diplomats received an e-mail from Berg's family that "noted he had not been in contact," Shannon said. On April 14, the consulate sent a private contractor to the Al-Fanar Hotel in Baghdad, where Berg was believed to be staying, to see if he was still there. "The people we talked to at the hotel didn't remember him being there," Shannon said. Diplomats then alerted the U.S. military to be on the lookout for him.
Lost track of him after the release? Hmmm.
But hotel staffers, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Berg stayed in room 602 from April 6 until April 10. One of them said Berg lived in the same room during an earlier visit, which the employee could not remember. An employee described Berg as a "nice guy" who "always smiled and said hello," unlike other foreign guests. "Once he told me, 'I'd like to learn Arabic.'" "He was very sportive - had muscles - and liked the Internet," another hotel worker recalled. "He usually left the hotel in the morning and returned late, around 10 p.m., usually carrying a sack of beer and mineral water."
Posted by:Steve White

#7  I am honored to have two older brothers in active duty right now. One of them is currently serving right in the heart of the beast, Baghdad. The emails he has sent home has described the place as very similar to the old wild west.

I personally have a great deal of admiration for Nicholas Berg. He seems, by all accounts, to have embodied the best attributes of Western society in that on one hand, there seemed to be a genuine altruistic motivation to help the iraqi people get on their feet, while at the same time pursuing it through means of an entrepeneurial effort. However, even in a civilzed situation, to conduct business like the kind he was pursuing requires a good deal of handshaking and shmoozing, and dealing. In a place like Iraq, besides having to deal with the on-edge coalition that is just barely keeping the place under control, in a place where the government is referred to as "interim", and in a place where the people you are trying to make the deals with are from a society and a culture very different from the one he grew up in, it would have been very easy to have inadverdantly say the wrong thing, get tricked into meeting with the wrong people, or just be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The restless, questing, free spirit has always been America's greatest asset, and at the same time, carried with it the ultimate risk, from the Pilgrims who risked their lives to live in a new land, the the first colonials, to the westward expanding pioneers, to our astronauts. There are plentiful examples of those who died pursuing this way of life.

I have not yet seen the film of Nick Berg's murder, and don't know that I need to. While some people need in-your-face proof just who and what our enemy is, since 9/11, I have not had anything obscuring my view of who they are, and what needs to be done to stop them.

I didn't know Nicholas Berg and I couldn't say that he was a saint, but from what I have learned about him, I can say that he seemed to be a good man - not a greedy, carpetbagging opportunist (some media subtly, but insidiously, refer to him as a "businessman", which conjures up pictures more akin to middle-age, balding, suit-wearing types, not 26-year olds who spent time in Ghana helping those people to live a little better). The people who would smear him in this way are the same people who would smear Pat Tillman, who also made the ultimate sacrifice in the pursuit of bettering the world. These people are cynics, and are bitter that while they whine impotently for a better world, people like Nick Berg and Pat Tillman actually try to contribute to that effort - even at the greatest risk.

For what it's worth, I feel absolutely horrible for Nick Berg and his family. I wish I had some words of comfort for them, but none would be appropriate. We need more people lke him, people who truly search for the win-win solution of, " I want to help people and improve their quality of life, and at the same time, fulfill my own ambitions and pusuits." May his family be comforted among the other mourners of zion, and may G-d rest his soul.
Posted by: Ken B.   2004-05-13 12:57:51 PM  

#6  Anon4813 was me...don't know what happened there....
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-13 10:37:22 AM  

#5  Mr. Berg (the elder, undeceased version) is dumping his grief and anti-american political baggage on the US effort. I think it's only logical the US would respond. If not, charges of conspiracy and coverup would abound (and still will among the moonbats). Was that Rumsfeld or Wolfowitz cutting his head off?
/sarcasm
Posted by: Anonymous4813   2004-05-13 10:32:48 AM  

#4  It seems to me that everytime something bad happens everyone is so quik to point the finger

Almost as if they are trying to justify what has happend to him. It all seems to me that they are just trying to protect their behinds

It seems to me that everytime something bad happens, shitheads like Anon1023 are so quick to point the finger, almost as if they are trying to justify what Islamonazi terorists do. It seems to me that they are just trying to protect their behinds, and pray that people don't support the war even more than they have in the last months.
Posted by: BMN   2004-05-13 10:17:14 AM  

#3  I don't think they're dumping on him; I think they're explaining why they couldn't protect him.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-05-13 10:15:06 AM  

#2  It seems to me that everytime something bad happens everyone is so quik to point the finger. I just find it interesting that now that an American was brutaly murdered, and we all saw, the government is quik to explain what a flake and how unrelable Burg was. Almost as if they are trying to justify what has happend to him. It all seems to me that they are just trying to protect their behinds, and pray that they don't loose even more war support than they already have in the last months.
Posted by: Anonymous1023   2004-05-13 10:08:43 AM  

#1  I hate to say this, but Mr. Berg (the deceased, younger version) is beginning to sound like a bit of a flake.
Posted by: Patrick Phillips   2004-05-13 9:49:15 AM  

00:00