Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Vladimir Kornilov
[RIA] In the case of the explosion of the Nord Streams, a new twist. It would be more accurate to say that a new version was thrown in to distract from the main suspect - the United States.
Recall that in February of this year, the well-known journalist Seymour Hersh published convincing evidence that it was Washington that organized the undermining of the critical infrastructure of the European Union. The West initially tried to pretend not to notice this investigation . But when it became clear that it would not be possible to silence Hersh's article, the process of generating one crazy version after another began in order to drown the main one among them. Thus, a completely ridiculous story appeared that the sabotage was carried out by "pro-Ukrainian activists" who had nothing to do with the state.
Well, since this version did not fit in with the facts and looked too stupid, now they decided to improve it. An investigative media pool in Germany and the Netherlands, headed by the German newspaper Die Zeit and the Dutch state broadcaster NOS, published a new version: they say that the Dutch military intelligence (MIVD) knew three months before the attacks that Kiev was planning to carry out the attacks. Only now "pro-Ukrainian activists" are gradually turning into the military intelligence command of Ukraine under the personal supervision of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Valery Zaluzhny.
Moreover, the "investigators" emphasize: no, no, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky did not know anything about the impending sabotage. It is even curious how this is theoretically possible and how the European media could find out about it. Apparently, the West realized that Zaluzhny was no longer a player, and thus decided to blame everything on him. Like, go to the bottom after the Nord Streams and don’t try to drag Zelensky along with you.
And it seems that this improved version really sounds more plausible than the outright profanity about "pro-Ukrainian activists": after all, military special forces have more opportunities to blow up an underwater object. True, here, too, a number of questions arise that baffle Western interpreters.
According to the "investigators", the secret services of the Netherlands, the United States, and Germany knew in advance about the impending terrorist attack. And how did it happen that they could not prevent the explosions? And even if they couldn't, why didn't they arrest the terrorists in hot pursuit, knowing perfectly well who was preparing the attacks? And why all the months after the explosions of the gas pipeline, the West pretended not to know their organizer?
The Dutch newspaper NRC, commenting on the new versions, laments the hard fate of a Western journalist: "Whoever did this, it's amazing how difficult it is to write or talk about it. Nobody wants to play into Putin's hands, even suggesting that the United States or Ukraine: At EU-NATO meetings, there is a motto: "Not a word about Nord Stream."
Here is the explanation for you! The Dutch journalist honestly and frankly admits: everyone understands who blew up the Nord Streams, but you can’t write so as not to “play into the hands of Putin.” One would like to ask: have you tried to write the truth? Like Seymour Hersh!
The improved version of "Pro-Ukrainian Activists - 2.0" raises another uncomfortable question. If earlier you tried to blame everything on a bunch of "terrorists-enthusiasts", then the new theory implies the participation of the armed forces of Ukraine in the attacks. In this regard, I would like to recall how, immediately after the explosions, the Western media habitually tried to shift the responsibility onto Russia. And then, I remember, a number of European newspapers hinted : isn't "damage to gas pipelines sufficient for the application of the Fifth Article of the NATO Charter?"
That is, to put it simply, there was a call to bomb Russia for undermining the critical infrastructure of the countries of the alliance. Well, well, let's say you agree there in Europe with the version that the attacks were carried out by the Ukrainian army - well, according to the same logic, we should now expect NATO bombings in Ukraine!
But we understand: "This is different!" They explained to us in an accessible way: you can’t play along with Putin. So they try to pretend that they do not understand obvious things. So this game is being played: let's blame anyone (partisans, Ukraine, Zaluzhny, Zelensky, UFO), if only the true organizer of the terrorist attacks is mentioned less.
|
