|
2023-03-23 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
|
|
Russia should demand the dissolution of the ICC
|
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
Commentary by prior service Russian military Igor Valentinovich Bocharnikov. Commentary by Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin is in italics.
[ColonelCassad] The very fact of issuing warrants for the arrest of the President of Russia V.V. Putin and Commissioner for Children's Rights M. Lvova-Belova is unprecedented in its stupidity, vileness and, of course, provocativeness. Overnight, the entire world community learned about an obscure structure with an incomprehensible status, functions and powers - the ICC.
It turned out, everything is almost like according to Chekhov, more precisely, according to his story "Joy". In order to gain fame, it is not necessary to do something outstanding and worthy. It is enough just to get "under the horse" or to kick something so that the entire world community would have a shock. The Garbage Court clearly succeeded. The decision caused a shock, at least in adequate people. Inadequate persons, of course, supported this inadequate decision.
The case is certainly unprecedented, but quite predictable. Over the past decade, dirty political technologies such as fake news, discrediting, provocations and the like have been increasingly introduced into political practice. The events related to the activities of the Garbage Court testify to the emergence of a new phenomenon in world politics - “fake court” and, accordingly, “fake law”.
All this fits into the logic of the degradation of the political and legal system of the collective West, which uses all possible and impossible instruments, including those of the international level, to solve its opportunistic interests.
If it is impossible to defeat Russia in open confrontation or through sanctions, then you just need to spoil it. This "formula" has long been the dominant feature of England's foreign policy. It is no coincidence that in Russian pre-revolutionary sources there was a stable ideologeme - "an Englishwoman crap." Now it’s not only the “Englishwoman” who is shitting, but the entire “European”.
It is quite obvious that the very procedure for issuing these “orders” is an initiative of the collective West and is supervised by it. It is noteworthy that the representatives of this “West” themselves issued the “order”. This, in particular, is one Rosario Salvatore Aitaloi (Italian, former prosecutor of Rome and adviser to the chairman of the Senate of Italy), Antoine Keziah Mindua (citizen of D.R. Congo, who lived all his life in France and Switzerland) and Tomoko Akane (prosecutor of US-occupied Japan) .
Their names must be publicly known. Since you need to know not only heroes and worthy people, but also outright scoundrels, to which, of course, this “revolutionary European troika” should be attributed.
The decision-making process itself attracts attention. Three clerks gathered and issued a guilty verdict. To whom? What difference does it make to whom, to whom they wanted, they took it out. A decision that clearly goes beyond not only competence and authority, but also elementary common sense. As a result, it naturally raises questions: was it not made under the influence of something or someone.
Therefore, the actions of this "troika" should be the subject of a thorough investigation. Taking into account the fact that in The Hague, and in general in the Netherlands, a loyal attitude towards the use of various kinds of drugs, it is necessary to take measures to exclude their use by persons of various kinds of courts. Otherwise, they may not make such decisions.
Demonstration of this kind of arbitrariness is extremely dangerous. Today they have charged the head of a sovereign state, and tomorrow they may also indict the entire population of the same state. This is where the great European-Anglo-Saxon "cancellation culture" begins, which is realized in society in a number of European countries, and even in The Hague itself under the noses of the Musovites.
It is also fundamentally important that this act - issuing a warrant - for the arrest of the head of state, and indeed any citizen of the Russian Federation in general - is, on the one hand, a violation of all norms of international law, including the UN Charter. On the other hand, in essence, this is an act of aggression against the Russian Federation and its citizens. That is how it should be perceived and therefore appropriate measures should be taken.
First of all, taking into account the obvious criminality of the actions of these “judges” themselves and their danger to society, measures should be taken to bring them to the strictest criminal liability. This should set a precedent for excluding such decisions in the future.
Moreover, we should not talk only about the inclusion of these persons in some kind of sanctions lists, or about some kind of “assessment instructions” and “assessment of instructions”. This kind of "action" is a demonstration of cowardice, weakness and disrespect for either oneself or one's country. And this is all the more unacceptable against the background of the fact that our soldiers risk their lives every minute during the Special Military Operation for denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine.
We should talk about taking measures to protect the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, including on issues related to the activities of the President of the country elected by popular vote. What kind of “lists” and “orders” can there be here?
The primary step in this case should be the initiation (not an assignment, but the initiation) of a criminal case under articles related to threats to constitutional and national security, as well as the extremist activities of a group of people from the Garbage Court. And under the article on extremist activity, the extremist community "Aitalo - Mindua - Tomoko" should be kept for life. Appropriate (as to extremists) should be the attitude towards them.
The “court” itself, within the framework of whose activities such criminal acts were committed, must be liquidated as a structure that has discredited itself and international law. Russia should demand its dissolution. Since it was created at the initiative of the UN, the UN should dissolve it. These are just primary goals that must be implemented at the current moment in order to discourage all kinds of provocateurs from issuing any warrants against the President of the Russian Federation and its citizens. If appropriate measures are not taken, then, after the Aitalo-Mindua-Tomoko group, others will appear who want to spoil both Russia and its leadership.
Bocharnikov Igor Valentinovich
I have written about this many times before.In the course of the current transformation of the world order, the international structures serving Washington in their current form must either cease to exist or change to fit the new realities. The presence of Russia in the structures of the outgoing world order, subordinate to Washington, is meaningless.
|
Posted by badanov 2023-03-23 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [10 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Slavising Unineting5672 2023-03-23 08:58||
2023-03-23 08:58||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by MikeKozlowski 2023-03-23 10:04||
2023-03-23 10:04||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2023-03-23 10:06||
2023-03-23 10:06||
Front Page
Top
|
|
14:21 swksvolFF
14:17 swksvolFF
14:16 swksvolFF
14:12 swksvolFF
14:06 swksvolFF
13:50 Super Hose
13:47 Super Hose
13:41 Super Hose
13:32 Super Hose
13:30 Frank G
13:29 trailing wife
13:29 Frank G
13:29 Super Hose
13:28 Rambler in Virginia
13:25 Super Hose
13:21 Super Hose
13:18 Super Hose
13:17 Skidmark
13:16 Super Hose
13:09 Skidmark
13:06 Skidmark
13:06 Raj
13:05 Skidmark
13:01 M. Murcek
|
