Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 04/20/2024 View Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024
2020-01-16 Economy
Nobody Makes Money Like Apollo's Ruthless Founder Leon Black
[Bloomberg Business Week] Leon Black, the most feared man in the most aggressive realm of finance, wants you to know he’s misunderstood. Not about the feared part‐that much is indisputable.

Black built his company, Apollo Global Management Inc., by buying struggling businesses with huge piles of debt at bargain-basement prices, imposing austerity measures on the staff, and extracting huge dividend payments and management fees. Many of Apollo’s most lucrative deals have been from companies other firms wouldn’t go near, and Black is concerned this has left him with a reputation for taking on inordinate risk. "We’ve actually made our most money during recessions," he says, growing agitated. As his face reddens over his blue Hermès tie, his incongruously soft voice rises by an octave, and he stabs a pile of printed-out emails with an eraserless No. 2 pencil. "Everybody else is running for the doors, and we’re backing up the trucks."

The most recent recession, triggered by the 2008 financial crisis, created an unprecedented opportunity for private equity firms, and few have taken better advantage than Apollo, Wall Street’s apex predator. During the past 10 years, its assets grew sixfold, to more than $320 billion. Black has amassed a personal fortune of $9.5 billion. Now 68, he became chairman of New York’s Museum of Modern Art in 2018, a coronation of sorts among the wealthiest of the wealthy. His office, which is guarded by a display of antique French long guns and has spectacular views of Central Park, is just above that of Henry Kravis, the most infamous corporate raider of the 1980s.

Who bears the risk in situations where Black is involved is an interesting question. A private equity takeover can involve deep payroll cuts, massive asset sell-offs, and taking on dangerous levels of debt. The process can mortally wound a company and trigger zero-sum fights over the corpse. Even if you don’t know Apollo, you know its targets: Caesars casinos, Claire’s jewelry stores, Linens ’n Things, all purchased just before the financial crisis and driven to bankruptcy under Black’s watch. That’s not always the outcome, but when it is, creditors are on the hook. Apollo, known for guarding its hoard, usually manages to walk away richer.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-01-16 08:11|| || Front Page|| [16 views ]  Top

#1 I fail to see how any of this is predatory. Black did not take on the underlying debt in question, then keep doubling down until the situation was beyond any salvage. The former management did that, he found a way to take current reality and make something of it.

Short story long, he didn't destroy the companies, former management did. There is this whole entire funny thing known as mathematics and past a certain point there is no return. You don't need an MBA or to have gone to Stanford, a legal pad and calculator will do.

If you're interested in predatory, how about the degenerate swine Corzine? The crimes he committed were first codified by Hammurabi for God's sake.
Posted by Cesare 2020-01-16 08:46||   2020-01-16 08:46|| Front Page Top

#2 Other Peoples Money(1991). If you think that every failing company should must be saved then you are either a Socialist or just an idiot.
Posted by magpie 2020-01-16 09:37||   2020-01-16 09:37|| Front Page Top

#3 Paying himself dividends from a failing business is clearly predatory. Aka looting.
Posted by Lex 2020-01-16 10:05||   2020-01-16 10:05|| Front Page Top

#4 I'd ban dividends from any company with net debt.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-01-16 11:36||   2020-01-16 11:36|| Front Page Top

#5 /\ +1000, BP! Pay off the creditors first or its theft.
Posted by magpie 2020-01-16 11:47||   2020-01-16 11:47|| Front Page Top

#6 #3 That sounds great and makes sense and I'm certainly for it. But here's the deal, we are idly chatting online and rapidly reached that conclusion. Debt agreements are individually tailored, and the more distress in the mix the more individual the document.

If a bunch of anonymous guys can spitball the solution in moments, what in the wide world of jurisprudence is wrong with their legal counsel?

Let's also keep in mind that practically speaking extending the already hopeless situation may not even be open to discussion if the beggar thinks they can dictate.
Posted by Cesare 2020-01-16 13:10||   2020-01-16 13:10|| Front Page Top

#7 re: #6 & #3

Sounds good at this level but what is the unintended consequence? No one buys the company?

You have to remember that if you change one variable the whole equation will change.
Posted by AlanC 2020-01-16 14:48||   2020-01-16 14:48|| Front Page Top

#8 There is an enormous amount of people that want to ban things...
Posted by Spanky Whuter1088 2020-01-16 17:15||   2020-01-16 17:15|| Front Page Top

07:02 Uleremp and Company7042
06:50 Procopius2k
06:48 Procopius2k
06:45 Procopius2k
06:43 Procopius2k
06:42 Procopius2k
06:36 Skidmark
06:30 Tom
06:27 Tom
06:26 Tom
06:24 Tom
06:22 Frank G
06:21 Tom
06:19 Frank G
06:15 MikeKozlowski
06:13 Skidmark
06:04 Skidmark
05:57 Skidmark
05:55 Skidmark
05:53 Skidmark
05:39 Skidmark
05:28 Skidmark
05:07 Grom the Reflective
04:46 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com