Article

2019-12-15 Government

[The Hill] After he was acquitted in a major fraud trial, former Labor Secretary Ray Donovan asked, "Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?" The trial was ruinous for Donovan, personally and financially, and the question was a fair one. Donovan, however, at least received a trial. Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page has never been given a fair hearing, let alone a trial, to clear his name. As the two political parties spin the results of a report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, one matter remains unaddressed. Someone needs to apologize to Page.
'Reader's Digest' version reproduced below. RTWT.
Early on, Horowitz found that an unnamed government agency, widely acknowledged to be the CIA, told the FBI that it was making a mistake about Page and that he was working for the agency as an "operational contact" in Moscow. Indeed, he was working as an asset for the CIA for years.

While it took long, someone at the Justice Department finally decided to act on the FISA matter regarding Page. The official in charge of FISA applications, Kevin Clinesmith, was told to ask the CIA again about whether Page had been working for the agency. He was again told that Page in fact was, yet Clinesmith allegedly changed the CIA response to describe Page as not working for it. He is now being criminally referred by Horowitz for falsifying that information.
No deep state, no witch hunt. Uh-huh.
Natasha Bertand later wondered why anyone would question the case against Page. After all, she wrote, Senator Mark Warner, who is ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, had warned reporters to "be careful what you wish for" and one of his aides told her that is is "simply impossible to review the documents" on Page and conclude anything other than that the FBI "had ample reason" to investigate him. Her article was published long after the FBI had been told that Page was working with the CIA, but many other stories ran with similar comments from senators suggesting that anyone defending Page would be ridiculed after the release of some damning evidence. Mueller and Horowitz have now confirmed that there was never such evidence showing Page was a Russian asset. Indeed, the evidence showed he was an American asset.
Media complicit? Don't be silly!
All I know is that he is an American citizen put under a secret surveillance operation based on a dossier shown to be both unfounded and unreliable. He then remained under surveillance with three renewals of secret warrants, even though the FBI was told repeatedly that Page was working with the CIA and that the dossier used to obtain those warrants was considered unsupported. Finally, Page was the subject of an alleged falsification of a document presented to the FISA court to obscure that exculpatory information.
Collateral damage. Can't make an omelet...
At what point does someone apologize to Page? He is, in fact, the victim of this criminal referral. He is the victim of what Horowitz describes as a "misleading" basis presented to the FISA court. He is a victim of media "groupthink" that portrayed him as the sinister link proving collusion with Russia, an allegation rejected by the FBI, by the inspector general, and by the special counsel. Of course, Washington does not work this way. Page served his purpose and the trashing of his reputation was a cost of doing business with the federal government for many members of Congress and the media. In recalling the question by Donovan, there is no such office. Page is simply supposed to disappear and leave his reputation behind.

Jonathan Turley is the chair of public interest law at George Washington University and served as the last lead counsel in a Senate impeachment trial. He testified as a Republican witness in House Judiciary Committee hearing in the Trump impeachment inquiry.
Carter Page the "Victim" or unindicted co-conspirator? You decide.

Posted by Bobby 2019-12-15 06:26|| || Front Page|| [11 views ] Top

#1 Indeed, he was working as an asset for the CIA for years. While it was falsely reported that Page met with three suspicious individuals there, he had no contact with two of those individuals. More importantly, Page did the right thing and told American officials about being contacted by the third person, because he felt they should know.
Emphasis added.

Of course he did "the right thing." That was his JOB! Retention of a security clearance demands this type of reporting. How does one pass a poly withholding foreign contact information ?

Someone, please tell me, how do these things happen? Oh WAIT !

"Tamerlan Tsarnaev was the perfect recruit. He had tentacles in the drug world. He spoke multiple languages. He could mix in anywhere. He was tall and handsome. He had an American wife." ` Michele McPhee

Posted by Besoeker 2019-12-15 08:13|| 2019-12-15 08:13|| Front Page Top

#2 Shitshow, Part 220.

American asset is libelled and slandered as a Russian asset.
The (perpetual) campaign operation that enlisted foreign spies to throw an election with dirty tricks claims the other side was guilty of same.

We are ruled by mendacious morons.

Posted by Lex 2019-12-15 08:23|| 2019-12-15 08:23|| Front Page Top

#3 Do we evidence for Page holding a security clearance? Maybe we should ask the Chinese since they have all the files. Our authorities appear confused on this matter and Page acts confused.

Posted by Classical_Liberal 2019-12-15 08:58|| 2019-12-15 08:58|| Front Page Top

#4 Hopefully the US Treasury Department.

Posted by Jack salami 2019-12-15 17:41|| 2019-12-15 17:41|| Front Page Top

21:03 DarthVader
20:45 Dale
20:25 Dale
19:01 One Eyed Protector of the Texans6023
18:27 Frank G
18:24 Uleremp and Company7042
18:20 Uleremp and Company7042
18:12 SteveS
17:28 Flerenter Thruque8664
17:17 SteveS
17:15 M. Murcek
17:05 Beldar+Uneter3543
16:38 trailing wife
16:27 swksvolFF
16:26 Super Hose
16:24 Super Hose
16:19 Skidmark
16:16 Skidmark
16:08 irish+rage+boy
15:55 Grom the Reflective
15:46 swksvolFF
15:37 Tom
15:19 M. Murcek
15:16 Penguin_of_the_Sanhedrin