Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024 View Sat 04/13/2024
2019-11-23 Government
The Air Force Tried to Operate Efficiently ‐ But Apparently That's Not Allowed
It's a sad day when the stubborn federal bureaucracy prevails over an entity attempting to manage taxpayer dollars efficiently. And when billionaire businessmen are allowed to dictate space policy to the United States Air Force, it's tragic. But that's what is happening to the National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program.

The NSSL is the Air Force's premier aerospace initiative, designed to keep America first in space by limiting the U.S.'s over-reliance on other countries' products and services through the thing America does best: competitive enterprise. That would be the case, unless influencers like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk get their way.

Thus far, the Air Force has run the NSSL efficiently, protecting America's national security with competitive contract bidding that has resulted in minimal waste to taxpayers. But big-name cronies and federal bureaucracy evidently won't permit an efficient government program and are doing their best to derail it.

Back in mid-August, Blue Origin – Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos' personal aerospace company – filed a protest against the Air Force's handling of the NSSL program. Blue Origin complained that the Air Force is operating NSSL unfairly, but that's ridiculous. Just this year alone, the Air Force's NSSL program awarded Blue Origin a massive contract valued at $500 million. Bezos' company isn‘t being treated unfairly and it isn't hurting for government money; it's just not being selected by the government 100 percent of the time. In filing protest, though, Blue Origin isn't trying to be logically consistent – it just wants more power.

By pressuring the Air Force to weaken its competitive structure, Blue Origin increased its chances of landing a launch contract. The move to protest was an obvious, self-serving ploy – one that the Department of Defense easily saw through. But apparently, this slipped by the bureaucratic watchdogs, who bought into the argument hook, line, and sinker.

On November 18, 2019, the U.S. Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) released a statement siding with Blue Origin. In the press release, the GAO argued that the NSSL's selection process was unjust because the Air Force's methodology "does not provide a reasonable, common basis on which offerors will be expected to compete." According to the GAO, should the NSSL program move forward, the Air Force must explicitly outline the various factors considered during its selection process.

But that's absurd. Here's why.

When it comes to the NSSL, the Air Force is essentially a consumer deciding which services it wants to acquire. Like any other consumer, the USAF has the opportunity to select from a range of different providers, each with different strengths and weaknesses. Consumers, however, are never forced to lay out in explicit detail the exact methodology for their decision; the onus is always on the service provider to prove their capabilities. But now, the GAO is arguing precisely the opposite.

The GAO would rather the consumer (in this case, the Air Force) be forced to articulate its myriad priorities and justify its decision-making to the service providers. This inverts market principles. It will also considerably slow down the NSSL by forcing the Air Force to retool its entire selection process. And for what? All to allow deep-pocket cronies like Jeff Bezos a better chance to snare government contracts.

Indeed, the GAO's decision is both completely unreasonable and wholly unprecedented. It also highlights the dangerous coupling of crony business interests and cumbersome government bureaucracy.

This isn't the first time cronyism has attempted to infiltrate the NSSL initiative, either.

In May 2019, SpaceX sued the Air Force for "wrongly awarding" NSSL launch contracts to its competitors. Once again, an aerospace company headed by a famous billionaire – Elon Musk in this case – attempted to use the power of federal bureaucracy to exert its crony influence over the NSSL's selection process. Just like Blue Origin's protest, SpaceX's lawsuit was undoubtedly filed to acquire more taxpayer funds, not out of a quest for fairness or justice. And while the courts have yet to rule on SpaceX's suit, in the case of Blue Origin, the GAO was more than happy to play ball.

Musk and Bezos are savvy. The two have already been a disruptive force within a largely stagnant space industry, and for the most part, I'm a fan of what they've managed to accomplish. I like how they have pushed commercial space flight to unprecedented success. But for all their positive disruption, both Bezos and Musk have made billions off of taxpayer-funded programs and subsidies.

They have figured out there's gain to be had in exploiting or creating government inefficiencies. Government waste is crony profit, and when inefficiencies don't exist, federal bureaucracy can be used to create them. That's exactly what is happening now with the NSSL – and that's precisely why people like Bezos and Musk cannot be trusted. They are attempting to weaken an effective, essential national security program, and government watchdogs like the GAO are helping to pave the way.
Posted by 746 2019-11-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 I'm calling bullshit. The only other competitor is United launch Alliance (Boeing + Lockheed) and their Atlas V uses Russian engines. Think ULA, as a monopoly w/ much political pull, will give the Air Force a competitive price w/o a SpaceX or Blue Origin breathing down their necks?
Posted by Unaitle Panda6599 2019-11-23 00:37||   2019-11-23 00:37|| Front Page Top

#2 Competitive contract bidding. When has it ever resulted in efficiency ?
Posted by Dron66046 2019-11-23 02:16||   2019-11-23 02:16|| Front Page Top

#3 Ask your corrupt congresscritter who writes the law that says your government procurement officer can't walk down to Walmart/Home Depot and buy some hammers, but must put it out for bid or use a GSA selected provider who will charge several times the price.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-11-23 07:13||   2019-11-23 07:13|| Front Page Top

#4 Sounds like a Deep State Turf Fight™ to me with the Congress Critters™ Vs. the Pentagon Posse™ Vs. the USAF REMF's... Hard to decide who to cheer for.
Posted by magpie 2019-11-23 10:51||   2019-11-23 10:51|| Front Page Top

#5 I call bullshit too!
Note that they don't use Falcon Heavy that exists or consider Starship or Blue Origin
BUT Vulcan doesn't Exist YET! 0 Flights
It's the prime platform and it's more powerful second stage was just shutdown
The Solid fuel one from the ENDLESSLY merging and RENAMING company doesn't exist either and it's one of the chosen...
THE GAO folks get my vote.
Posted by 3dc 2019-11-23 12:24||   2019-11-23 12:24|| Front Page Top

#6  people like Bezos and Musk cannot be trusted. They are attempting to weaken an effective, essential national security program, and government watchdogs like the GAO are helping to pave the way

Oligarchs 'R' US[A]
Posted by Lex 2019-11-23 13:46||   2019-11-23 13:46|| Front Page Top

#7 BTW Atlas can not be bid as it uses the Russian engines.
Instead ULA and it's parents Boeing/Lockheed are using Vulcan (0 flights) with Blue Origin first stage engines (0 Flights).

So Vulcan is king but uses Blue Origin engines and an all Blue Origin rocket must be questionable.... Implication is the Blue must only be an engine manufacturer. A rather presumptive and regal attitude.
Posted by 3dc 2019-11-23 14:01||   2019-11-23 14:01|| Front Page Top

#8 Well, ULA will either do better than Boeing is these days, or it won't...
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-11-23 15:19||   2019-11-23 15:19|| Front Page Top

#9 Space X's explosions don't count tho. They are ahead of everyone else, except they aren't.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-11-23 15:22||   2019-11-23 15:22|| Front Page Top

#10 Q: What is the difference between Math and Engineering?
A: Engineering is like Math, only louder.

Rocket Science is *really* loud.
Posted by SteveS 2019-11-23 16:06||   2019-11-23 16:06|| Front Page Top

14:45 NoMoreBS
14:39 NoMoreBS
14:39 Frank G
14:35 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:30 Penguin_of_the_Desert
14:17 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:48 NoMoreBS
13:40 Frank G
13:40  
13:32 swksvolFF
13:27 EMS Artifact
13:25 Secret Master
13:08 swksvolFF
13:05 mossomo
13:01 mossomo
12:55 swksvolFF
12:52 swksvolFF
12:50 jpal
12:37 JohnQC
12:07 Beldar+Uneter3543
11:57 Super Hose
11:55 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com