Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 03/29/2024 View Thu 03/28/2024 View Wed 03/27/2024 View Tue 03/26/2024 View Mon 03/25/2024 View Sun 03/24/2024 View Sat 03/23/2024
2019-09-12 Home Front: Culture Wars
Republican Lawmakers Introduce Bill to End Nationwide Legal Injunctions
h/t Instapundit
[FreeBeacon] Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) and Rep. Mark Meadows (R., N.C.) introduced legislation Wednesday to end nationwide injunctions after a California judge took action to stop a change in the Trump administration's asylum policy from going into effect.

The legislation, titled the "Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act," would prevent individual district court judges from issuing nationwide halts to new policies.

Earlier this week, a California district court judge reinstated a nationwide injunction against the Trump administration's new asylum policy, which halted its implementation. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judge's decision Wednesday and allowed the policy to go into effect.
Now that could be Yuge
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-09-12 05:35|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Good news. Political activism in its worst form.
Posted by Dale 2019-09-12 07:27||   2019-09-12 07:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Doing the job SCOTUS refuses to do. You think they're going to curtail the power of the judiciary. Come on now, 'professional courtesy'. If the Donks were smart they'd join in at the rate Trump is getting judges on the bench.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-09-12 07:33||   2019-09-12 07:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Will never pass in the house. How else are the demoncrats gonna push their agenda on the American people?
Posted by DarthVader 2019-09-12 09:32||   2019-09-12 09:32|| Front Page Top

#4 The 'Pubs had every opportunity to do this between 2016 and 2018 and like a lot of other legislation, chose not to. Now like the Delta Tau Chi boys in Animal House, they choose now to make a stupid, futile gesture. Assholes.
Posted by Raj 2019-09-12 10:27||   2019-09-12 10:27|| Front Page Top

#5 Careful what you wish for. Probably best left to SCOTUS.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-12 11:16||   2019-09-12 11:16|| Front Page Top

#6 Lex is right, remember a Republican appointee in south Texas rained havoc on Obama's executive orders re: immigration using national injunctions. I think the better practice would be to setup an automatic accelerated appeal for every national injunction. Additionally, the Trump administration should be fighting lawfare with lawfare. The DOJ should get off its ass in Washington and seek friendly judges elsewhere.
Posted by brujotejano 2019-09-12 12:43||   2019-09-12 12:43|| Front Page Top

#7 The DOJ should get off its ass in Washington and seek friendly judges elsewhere.

Agreed, but I think one problem with that would be the 'institutional resistance' in the DOJ after Obama put so many of his rumpswabs on the payroll (there and everywhere else) just before he left office.
Posted by Raj 2019-09-12 12:50||   2019-09-12 12:50|| Front Page Top

#8 If I understand correctly, even Appeals Court rulings are valid only withing their geographical area. How does a local judge have the power to issue nationwide rulings?
Posted by Tom 2019-09-12 12:57||   2019-09-12 12:57|| Front Page Top

#9 Rumpswab... I’m stealing that! Got morning coffee in my nose laughing. Thanks a lot...
Posted by NoMoreBS 2019-09-12 13:11||   2019-09-12 13:11|| Front Page Top

#10 How about, if a judge issues a national injunction and it's overruled by either the circuit court or SCOTUS, the judge is then taken to the white house, tarred, feathered and set on fire. So they can still issue them but only at great personal peril. And to raise money, you can watch on Pay per view.
Posted by Silentbrick 2019-09-12 21:18||   2019-09-12 21:18|| Front Page Top










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com