Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024 View Sat 04/13/2024 View Fri 04/12/2024
2018-11-18 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
How Misguided Environmentalism Is To Blame For California's Wildfires
[The Federalist] I grew up in California’s Ventura County and have family in both southern and northern California. Right now, the most deadly fire in California’s history is racing across northern California. The Camp Fire has already killed at least 56 people, burned down 7,700 homes, and destroyed the entire town of Paradise. A brush fire is also wreaking havoc on southern California. The Woolsey Fire has destroyed 98,362 acres, killed two people, and damaged several Hollywood landmarks such as the set of "MASH" and the Reagan Ranch.

Article after article blames two things for California’s frequent fires: global warming and human action. For example, a BuzzFeed article is titled, "How A Booming Population And Climate Change Made California’s Wildfires Worse Than Ever." While dry conditions make fires more likely and people often start them, this misses the big picture. President Trump summed it up on Nov 10. He wrote, "There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor ... Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!"

Trump is right. Mismanagement and overregulation deserve most of the blame, but he should keep in mind that the federal government owns 57 percent of California forest land. This mismanagement is also not a result of a lack of care. Believe me, Californians care.

Growing up, we spend almost as much time talking about fire safety as we do hiding under our desks practicing for earthquakes. We see just as much of Smokey the Bear as we do of Mickey Mouse. California and federal agencies have mismanaged forests, not because they don’t care, but because they chose the agenda of environmentalists over commonsense forest management. The result has been deadly.

The federal government owns 45.8 percent of California’s land, while 4 percent is owned by the state and 51 percent is privately owned. CAL FIRE manages both state and private land. Part of the reason it is so difficult to manage California forests is the bureaucratic milieu. The Forest Service manages 193 million acres of land, has 28,000 employees, and has an annual outlay of $7 billion a year, according to a 2017 Analytical Perspective from the budget of the U.S. government.

For decades, environmental protection schemes have usurped common sense. For example, most fire ecologists say that the surest way of preventing massive forest fires is to use prescribed burns. The California Environmental Protection Agency states that "prescribed burning is the intentional use of fire to reduce wildfire hazards, clear downed trees, control plant diseases, improve rangeland and wildlife habitats, and restore natural ecosystems."

Related: Townhall - Who or What Is Really Responsible for the Huge Forest Fires in California?

Related: Wash Times - Loggers support Trump's claim that wildfires caused by 'poor forest management'
Posted by Besoeker 2018-11-18 00:17|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Daily Caller: As California Burns, Jerry Brown Takes Heat For Vetoing 2016 Wildfire Mitigation Bill
Posted by Besoeker 2018-11-18 01:11||   2018-11-18 01:11|| Front Page Top

#2 Buy enough wood chippers to solve the "bureaucrat problem," and when that's managed, retask to clearing the deadfall in the forests...
Posted by M. Murcek 2018-11-18 05:50||   2018-11-18 05:50|| Front Page Top

#3 Coasties know how everyone else should live. Virtuous aren't they.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-11-18 05:54||   2018-11-18 05:54|| Front Page Top

#4 Comment #2 is giving me a Fargo flashback moment!
Posted by Raj 2018-11-18 05:56||   2018-11-18 05:56|| Front Page Top

#5 I blame the straws!
Posted by rjschwarz 2018-11-18 10:40||   2018-11-18 10:40|| Front Page Top

#6 More lives sacrificed on the Leftist altar of Gaia. Eggs - omelette.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2018-11-18 11:09||   2018-11-18 11:09|| Front Page Top

#7 ...as long as they're not the one's being 'offed', they have no problem with reducing world population in the pursuit of their religion.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-11-18 12:06||   2018-11-18 12:06|| Front Page Top

#8 The electric company was supposed to maintain under the power lines, they didn't. I believe the state was supposed to maintain elsewhere. Instead the money went to the illegals.
Posted by gorb 2018-11-18 18:08||   2018-11-18 18:08|| Front Page Top

00:05 Uleremp and Company7042









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com