Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/28/2015 View Mon 07/27/2015 View Sun 07/26/2015 View Sat 07/25/2015 View Fri 07/24/2015 View Thu 07/23/2015 View Wed 07/22/2015
1
2015-07-28 Home Front: WoT
The F-35: Throwing Good Money after Bad
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2015-07-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Amen. Kill the damn thing, before it kills us.
Posted by DarthVader 2015-07-28 00:16||   2015-07-28 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 As usual, the techy loving admirals and generals tried to make the F-35 into a flying Swiss Army Knife...much like a bad rerun of the F-111 program
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2015-07-28 00:18||   2015-07-28 00:18|| Front Page Top

#3 It sure left Oshkosh in a hurry. The F 22's were more impressive and just plain looked right.
Posted by Zorba de Medici9541 2015-07-28 01:01||   2015-07-28 01:01|| Front Page Top

#4 And yeah, the article quotes the lies from the idiot David Axe piece. It's bad enough that he lies, why do y'all feel so damn compelled to lie to me on his behalf?
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2015-07-28 01:03||   2015-07-28 01:03|| Front Page Top

#5 Damnit, here's a link:
Furthermore, it should be noted, there’s quite a few people pushing back against Axe’s sensationalistic piece. Far from being the true test that shows once and for all the F-35 is a POS, it was in fact, a first look, aimed at finding out not so much how well the F-35 performed against the F-16, but rather at what parts of the flight control software could be improved to give the F-35 more maneuverability, particularly at high Angles of Attack (AoA). It appears the F-35 used in the test, AF-2 the second build “A” model for the Air Force, was also using flight control software that restricted certain portions of the envelope. And my sources also tell me the test took place during a time when there were restrictions on the engine performance. While the pilot might have no restrictions on throttle movement, the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) was programmed in a manner that would restrict some of the output.
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2015-07-28 01:26||   2015-07-28 01:26|| Front Page Top

#6 "But, does it have port holes?"
Posted by newc 2015-07-28 02:16||   2015-07-28 02:16|| Front Page Top

#7 There were warnings.
Posted by Besoeker 2015-07-28 04:33||   2015-07-28 04:33|| Front Page Top

#8 TFSM, here's the deal: It doesn't matter whether it can go into orbit like a flying saucer, if we can't afford to build them, then we can't have them.
It's kind of like the plans for the fleet of B2's.
Posted by ed in texas 2015-07-28 08:08||   2015-07-28 08:08|| Front Page Top

#9 Ed: then maybe you should look at the people who are committing disarmament-by-goldbricking by keeping the production rate low and keeping it in eternal prototype status.

Furthermore, the people committing disarmament-by-goldbricking have getting the project cancelled after spending the development money as one of their _objectives_.
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2015-07-28 08:54||   2015-07-28 08:54|| Front Page Top

#10 Well the problems that buggered the F-35 have been around since the 1970's. One of the big ones is distributed manufacturing and design. Instead of building a complete aircraft at a site, pieces of it get parceled out do different states to get politicians behind it. Then they add security clearance requirements out the wazoo for the guys that actually build the tooling and design the software. Strange things happen. On one project the tail was an inch off diameter from fitting the fuselage.
Posted by Bob These1478 2015-07-28 09:42||   2015-07-28 09:42|| Front Page Top

#11 Bob, then the answer would be to change the plan so it is built all in ft worth like the f16.
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2015-07-28 13:58||   2015-07-28 13:58|| Front Page Top

#12 Bottom line, We gotta make this thing work.
Posted by Shipman 2015-07-28 14:39||   2015-07-28 14:39|| Front Page Top

#13 Yeah, Fort Worth, the proposed home to 50% of the A-12 production also. another gold plated POS (but at least it was the NAVY's POS)
Posted by USN, Ret. 2015-07-28 15:02||   2015-07-28 15:02|| Front Page Top

#14 There was a metric boatload of money spent on the A-12, was it all wasted.? I wonder if some was side-tracked. My understanding is that from all the money spent there are only the remains of a boiler-plate stashed away. At least we got 100+ F-35' mostly Bees going directly to customers that want them. Deploying to Japan 2016(?).
Posted by Shipman 2015-07-28 16:58||   2015-07-28 16:58|| Front Page Top

#15 About all from the A-12 that survived was the radar ( in current gen F-18s). flight control software now obsolete, manufacturing processes obsolete. Oh yeah the engines live on in the Hornet/Superhornet.
There was one canopy made that was later sold on Ebay to a private individual.
and lots of neat swag.
Posted by USN, Ret. 2015-07-28 17:37||   2015-07-28 17:37|| Front Page Top

#16 Humm, u know stuff
Posted by Shipman 2015-07-28 17:56||   2015-07-28 17:56|| Front Page Top

#17 The F-4C was a lead sled that was asked to do air to air and air to ground; while sitting nuclear alert and handling ship surveillance missions. It put out a exhaust trail that let the enemy find you by simply following the smoke and burned 1000 lbs. a minute in AB(with only a 12,000 lb. fuel load flying clean). Yet, I wish I could have flown in the E model. Most of us that flew it, loved it. The Israelis showed its true potential and that, despite being often outnumbered and, sometimes, outclassed by opposing equipment. Bottom line, it's still the guy (or gal) that straps on the plane that ultimately makes the difference. The F-35 looks like an expensive F-4 (note the same lack of rear visibility). Just get on with it. Can it or go into production, it's the time lag that makes for obsolescence. Maybe by the time there is an E model the enemy will be shuddering or at least the IAF will have installed an external rear view mirror.
Posted by Total War 2015-07-28 19:54||   2015-07-28 19:54|| Front Page Top

23:11 OldSpook
22:14 lord garth
21:53 JosephMendiola
21:41 JosephMendiola
21:36 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:34 CrazyFool
21:32 Huperens Peacock6234
21:32 Huperens Peacock6234
21:25 JosephMendiola
20:39 Besoeker
20:38 Fillmore2357
20:32 Pappy
20:31 Fillmore2357
19:54 Total War
19:32 3dc
19:32 JosephMendiola
19:30 JosephMendiola
19:23 BrerRabbit
18:41 swksvolFF
18:39 Alaska Paul
18:02 Shipman
18:00 Ebbang Uluque6305
17:56 Shipman
17:55 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com