Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024
2004-06-16 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Khatami threatens to resume uranium enrichment drive
Iran threatened on Wednesday to resume uranium enrichment, a process that could be used to make atomic bombs, if the U.N. nuclear agency passed a toughly-worded resolution rebuking Tehran for poor cooperation. The United States immediately accused Iran of trying to bully the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), meeting in Vienna, and said such tactics increased suspicions that Tehran was secretly making weapons. "The basic message that Iran is sending is that they have something to hide and they’re going to use any means they have, including intimidation, to keep things from coming to light," U.S. ambassador to the U.N. in Vienna Kenneth Brill said.

In his toughest warning to the IAEA yet, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami described as "very bad" a resolution drafted by Britain, Germany and France that "deplores" Iran’s inadequate cooperation with the agency. "I am not saying we will do something particular, but if this resolution passes, Iran will have no moral commitment to suspend uranium enrichment," he told reporters. Khatami, aware that Washington wants its case sent to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions, balanced his tough line with assurances that Iran’s nuclear aims were peaceful and that Tehran did not plan to kick out U.N. inspectors. "We have no intention of using nuclear technology for military use," he said. "We will continue our cooperation with the agency in the framework of the law and our rights."

In Vienna, several diplomats said a majority of the IAEA board backed the draft resolution and it was unlikely the text would be greatly changed. The draft was expected to go before the board for formal debate later on Wednesday, and the board could take a formal position as early as Thursday, they said. Hossein Mousavian, head of Iran’s delegation in Vienna, said Iran might end its partnership with Britain, Germany and France, who brokered an agreement last year that led to Iran suspending uranium enrichment and agreeing to snap nuclear inspections. To the Europeans’ annoyance, Iran has never completely stopped enrichment-related activities.
How dare they annoy the Euro's, don't they know they'll send a stern note?
"Despite the threats from Iran, the Europeans are standing firm. This is typical brinkmanship on the part of Iran," a Western diplomat from an influential IAEA board member said. Joe Cirincione, a nuclear expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think-tank in Washington, said most IAEA board members believed Iran was playing a "cat and mouse" game with the IAEA while pursuing secret weapons-related activities. "This is why the EU strategy is to suspend the enrichment program. You stop that while the IAEA is carrying out inspections," he said. Iran says the resolution under discussion in Vienna has blown technical shortcomings out of proportion and is driven by an anti-Iranian political agenda in the United States. "The IAEA resolution is very bad ... (it) violates our country’s rights," Khatami said. "Iran’s nuclear row is political, and there is a political will behind it to stop us accessing peaceful nuclear technology," he said. Diplomats in Vienna say Washington wants a tougher resolution which would set a deadline for Iran to clear up remaining ambiguities about its nuclear program. Failure to do so would see Iran reported to the Security Council. Khatami ruled out following the calls of some hard-liners in the Islamic Republic for Iran to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which would remove its nuclear program from the scrutiny of U.N. inspectors. "We are a member of the NPT and we will continue to be so," he said.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-06-16 9:27:23 AM|| || Front Page|| [10 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Instead of just one toughly worded rebuke, the UN should send multiple toughly worded rebukes. Each rebuke should make it very clear that something needs to happen. I'm sure China would be on board with this.

If that doesn't work maybe a threat, after the threat some negotiating to pave the way for inspections. If after all that the mullahs still drag their sandals then a ten page condemnation signed by the intire world body politic, sans france due to prior agreement. The condemnation should leave no wriggle room, its put up or shut up, a dire warning. Like a shot accros the bow!

Posted by Lucky 2004-06-16 12:23:56 PM||   2004-06-16 12:23:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 I presume that after the "shot across the bow" they will have waiting in the wings, a stern lecture, severe finger shaking and, failing those drastic measures, the justly famous threat of diplomatic intervention.
Posted by Zenster 2004-06-16 3:25:57 PM||   2004-06-16 3:25:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Damn Lucky are you talking about
a MTIWTR? That's a damn serious escalation.

Multiple Targeted Indendently Worded Tough Responoses are a signal for all out thermo baric debate!
Are you sure you would want that on your soul?
Posted by Shipman 2004-06-16 5:30:44 PM||   2004-06-16 5:30:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Once again we are headed for a do loop. do research, make findings known in a report, present to UN, everyone a twitter, make UN resoulution, threaten serious consequences, Iran goes nuts does the version of a Kimmie, back to the UN. You get the picture. The only way out of the do loop is either:
Iran gets a nuke, thereby mootifying the UN.
The US steps in, mootifying Iran.

There ya go folks, the secret playbook.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2004-06-16 6:20:14 PM||   2004-06-16 6:20:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 If there is a debate, I can think of no better place than right smack dab in the center of the UN. No deliberative organization has the moxy to get right to it more than the UN.

Let my soul not be troubled. Let the debate begin. And if there is a resolution may it not be as drastic as diplomatic intervention, (the horror) but serious rebuke followed by....
Posted by Lucky 2004-06-16 10:37:46 PM||   2004-06-16 10:37:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 A second taunt rebuke with even sterner language?
Posted by .com 2004-06-16 10:47:45 PM||   2004-06-16 10:47:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Yep, what dot sez. Hey mustafa, que bueno?
Posted by Lucky 2004-06-17 12:07:11 AM||   2004-06-17 12:07:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Do Khatami and Kimmy coordinate their threats so that the statements are staggered? I picture two girlfiends on the phone preventing the faux pas of purchasing the same prom dress?
Posted by Super Hose 2004-06-17 12:24:05 AM||   2004-06-17 12:24:05 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Is time to call in Mister Frowny Face?
Posted by Seafarious  2004-06-17 12:31:57 AM||   2004-06-17 12:31:57 AM|| Front Page Top

00:28 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com