Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024
2004-05-10 Home Front: WoT
Sergeant's Lawyers Seek to Relocate Trial
FORT BRAGG, N.C. -- Lawyers for an Army sergeant accused in a fatal grenade attack on his fellow soldiers in the opening days of the Iraq war asked Monday that the trial be moved or that jurors be chosen from another branch of the military. "This offense received worldwide coverage," said Capt. David Coombs, one of the lawyers for Sgt. Hasan Akbar. "Any Army member who heard this had a visceral response." Defense lawyers also complained that everyone in the pool of potential Army jurors outranks Akbar, whose court-martial is set to begin July 12.
Well, duh!

Akbar, 32, is charged with two counts of premeditated murder and three counts of attempted premeditated murder for the March 23, 2003, attack in Kuwait on a group of fellow 101st Airborne Division soldiers and others. Two people were killed and 14 were wounded. It is the first time since the Vietnam War that a U.S. Army soldier has been prosecuted for the murder or attempted murder of another soldier during wartime, the Army has said. Coombs argued that reports from journalists embedded with military units at the time were so pervasive that military personnel still could have fixed opinions more than a year later. He suggested selecting court-martial panel members from another branch of service.
Fine, how about the Marines?
They might be able to find twelve midshipmen still sore about the 2001 Army-Navy game.
However, military prosecutor Capt. Rob McGovern said there was no evidence that any potential jurors have been influenced by the publicity. He said panel members already selected for the pool promised that they wouldn't expose themselves to coverage of the case. The judge, Col. Patrick Parrish, did not rule on the motion immediately. It was not clear when he would rule, post officials said.
If convicted, Akbar could receive the death penalty, life in prison without parole or life with parole. His lawyers have said he was accused only because he is Muslim.
And he was missing from his post and he was short a few grenades, etc..

Killed in the March 23, 2003, attack at Camp Pennsylvania were Army Capt. Christopher Scott Seifert, 27, of Easton, Pa., and Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone, 40, of Boise, Idaho.
Akbar's lawyers also asked the judge to require that a new pool of jurors be selected at random. The current pool was selected by the commanding general of the XVIII Airborne Corps, of which the 101st is a member. None of the members has a rank lower than sergeant first class.
Which is standard procedure in a case like this. The military lawyers know this, they're just throwing stuff against the wall and seeing what sticks.

Although the 101st Airborne is based at Fort Campbell, Ky., the case was transferred to Fort Bragg last year because the division was deployed in Iraq. The 101st has since returned. Akbar is no longer a member of the 101st, and has been assigned to the 18th Airborne Corps.
Soon to be assigned to Ft. Leavenworth.
Posted by Steve 2004-05-10 1:28:55 PM|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Ah, the old "civ lawyers in a General Court" trick. Lots of fun to be had by all...
Posted by mojo  2004-05-10 3:55:43 PM||   2004-05-10 3:55:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 There may be an opening to move the trial to Gusev Crater, Mars.
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-10 3:58:54 PM||   2004-05-10 3:58:54 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 obviously taking notes on Mark Geragos's defense of Scott Peterson...venue change and unlimited voire dire challenges?
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-10 4:00:26 PM||   2004-05-10 4:00:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 ..Da Rulz (AKA the Uniform Code Of Military Justice) defines 'trial by ones peers' as meaning you are entitled to an all enlisted jury if you are an EM, and they can be of any rank. This has been challenged and upheld time after time. The prosecutors especially like it when an EM is dumb enough to ask for that option, because a jury full of E7s through E9s are likely to hang the guy far higher than an all-officer jury would.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-05-10 7:19:35 PM||   2004-05-10 7:19:35 PM|| Front Page Top

20:11 Omomomble Glusoter5572
19:12 SteveS
18:02 swksvolFF
17:55 swksvolFF
17:45 Grom the Reflective
16:31 jpal
16:02 Beldar+Uneter3543
16:01 M. Murcek
15:59 Super Hose
15:43 Procopius2k
15:42 Procopius2k
15:39 49 Pan
15:37 M. Murcek
15:36 M. Murcek
15:28 Dale
15:28 Grom the Reflective
15:27 Dale
15:26 M. Murcek
15:23 Dale
15:15 Beldar+Uneter3543
15:02 Besoeker
15:00 Uleremp and Company7042
14:59 NoMoreBS
14:54 Uleremp and Company7042









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com