Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2010-12-06 Home Front: WoT
Mosque shuns FBI informant
[Al Jazeera] An FBI informant who attempted to infiltrate an Islamic community centre in the quiet Caliphornian town of Irvine scared Mohammedan worshippers so much with his talk of violent jihad that they took out order against him, the Washington Post reported.
Good for them. That's what we want -- American Muslims protecting the society they joined by rejecting old-world jihadi viciousness.
The FBI claims its use of such informants has prevented more attacks since the attacks of September 11, 2001.
That is, indeed, what the Washington Post has reported over the years.
Yet its officials have said that they do not target Mohammedans - an argument that has long been taken with a dose of scepticism by some commentators.

The latest case follows revelations that a man who tried to bomb a Christmas ceremony in Portland, Oregon, did so not only whilst under FBI surveillance, but had been provided with fake explosives by its undercover agents.

Making matters worse for the agency, Craig Monteilh, the convicted fraudster whom the FBI sent into the mosque to spy on its members, has gone public and is suing the investigative agency.

The two cases are reviving criticisms over the government agency's apparent surveillance of Mohammedans in the US.

Southern Caliphornian Mohammedan community leaders have expressed outrage over the FBI's methods, saying it undermines any efforts to build trust.

"The community feels betrayed," Shakeel Syed, the executive director of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern Caliphornia, told the Post.

"They got a guy, a bona fide criminal, and obviously trained him and sent him to infiltrate mosques," Syed was quoted as saying. "And when things went sour, they ditched him and he got mad. It's like a soap opera, for God's sake."
But you are well out of it, Mr. Syed, because your congregation openly rejected the man's attempted seduction to evil. You should be proud of yourselves for what you have demonstrated to your neighbors, your country, and the world.
Posted by Fred 2010-12-06 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ]  Top

#1 it undermines any efforts to build trust This is an ambiguous statement. Of course we'd want anyone to distrust someone promoting JIHAD! So what if he's an FBI plant.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-12-06 00:33||   2010-12-06 00:33|| Front Page Top

#2 Fake religion rejects fake Mohammedan, sent by fake law enforcement agency, in fake US State?
Posted by Besoeker 2010-12-06 01:09||   2010-12-06 01:09|| Front Page Top

#3 Just because they rejected an FBI plant doesn't mean they reject jihad. Maybe he just didn't "smell" like one of them so they ostracized him.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-12-06 16:10||   2010-12-06 16:10|| Front Page Top

#4 And when things went sour, they ditched him

Not that the FBI wouldn't ditch an informant in a New York minute, but just what position could they have left him in? Did they tell the guy they would help resettle if things went bad or protect him from court orders or make things right with the Muslim community or something?
Posted by gorb 2010-12-06 22:54||   2010-12-06 22:54|| Front Page Top

08:52 Matt
08:38 Gleng Whaick2262
08:35 Gleng Whaick2262
08:35 Gleng Whaick2262
08:33 Gleng Whaick2262
08:32 Gleng Whaick2262
08:31 Gleng Whaick2262
08:28 Gleng Whaick2262
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com