Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/30/2024 View Mon 04/29/2024 View Sun 04/28/2024 View Sat 04/27/2024 View Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024
2008-03-28 Iraq
U.S. Armor Forces Join Offensive In Baghdad Against Sadr Militia
U.S. forces in armored vehicles battled Mahdi Army fighters Thursday in Sadr City, the vast Shiite stronghold in eastern Baghdad, as an offensive to quell party-backed militias entered its third day. Iraqi army and police units appeared to be largely holding to the outskirts of the area as American troops took the lead in the fighting.

Four U.S. Stryker armored vehicles were seen in Sadr City by a Washington Post correspondent, one of them engaging Mahdi Army militiamen with heavy fire. The din of American weapons, along with the Mahdi Army's AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades, was heard through much of the day. U.S. helicopters and drones buzzed overhead.

The clashes suggested that American forces were being drawn more deeply into a broad offensive that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, launched in the southern city of Basra on Tuesday, saying death squads, criminal gangs and rogue militias were the targets. The Mahdi Army of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, a Shiite rival of Maliki, appeared to have taken the brunt of the attacks; fighting spread to many southern cities and parts of Baghdad.

As President Bush told an Ohio audience that Iraq was returning to "normalcy," administration officials in Washington held meetings to assess what appeared to be a rapidly deteriorating security situation in many parts of the country.

Maliki decided to launch the offensive without consulting his U.S. allies, according to administration officials. With little U.S. presence in the south, and British forces in Basra confined to an air base outside the city, one administration official said that "we can't quite decipher" what is going on. It's a question, he said, of "who's got the best conspiracy" theory about why Maliki decided to act now.

In Basra, three rival Shiite groups have been trying to position themselves, sometimes through force of arms, to dominate recently approved provincial elections.

The U.S. officials, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said that they believe Iran has provided assistance in the past to all three groups -- the Mahdi Army; the Badr Organization of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, Iraq's largest Shiite party; and forces loyal to the Fadhila Party, which holds the Basra governor's seat. But the officials see the current conflict as a purely internal Iraqi dispute.

Some officials have concluded that Maliki himself is firing "the first salvo in upcoming elections," the administration official said.

"His dog in that fight is that he is basically allied with the Badr Corps" against forces loyal to Sadr, the official said. "It's not a pretty picture."

Elements of Sadr's militia have fought fiercely, including rocketing the Green Zone, the huge fortified compound in Baghdad where the U.S. Embassy, Iraqi government offices and international agencies are located.

Starting about 5:25 p.m., the Post reporter heard the launch of 14 rockets, which Mahdi Army officers in the area said were aimed at the Green Zone. U.S. officials reported that 12 rounds hit the zone in that time frame, including six that fell inside the embassy compound. An American civilian contractor was killed in a residential area of the embassy compound, while another death was reported in the zone's U.N. compound.

Several Mahdi Army commanders said they had been fighting U.S. forces for the past three days in Sadr City, engaging Humvees as well as the Strykers. By their account, an Iraqi special forces unit had entered Sadr City from another direction, backed by Americans, but otherwise the fighting had not been with Iraqis.

"If there were no Americans, there would be no fighting," said Abu Mustafa al-Thahabi, 38, a senior Mahdi Army member.

In August, Sadr ordered his militia to observe a cease-fire, a move widely credited with helping to reduce violence across Iraq. In recent days, Sadr officials have said the cease-fire remains in force. But in practice, his fighters and Iraqi and U.S. forces are waging full-scale war in places. Further fighting with his men could slow U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq.

American commanders said in recent days that their units were taking only a backup role in the offensive and that Iraqi forces were growing strong enough to shoulder the country's security needs.

Maj. Mark Cheadle, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, said he could not make an accurate assessment of what the Post reporter saw without knowing the precise location. He underlined that U.S. troops were playing a backup role in the offensive but that on a battlefield that is "360 degrees," it might seem at times that they were out front. If an Iraqi unit was about to be overwhelmed by an enemy, "of course we are going to assist."

On Thursday, thousands of followers of Sadr turned out for a peaceful demonstration in Baghdad. Iraqi television channels carried crowd scenes in which people carried a coffin draped in flags and decorated with a portrait of Maliki. They denounced him as a "new dictator" and chanted: "Maliki keep your hands off. People do not want you."

Gunmen wearing police commando uniforms stormed the Baghdad home of a well-known member of Maliki's government, Tahseen al-Sheikhli, and took him hostage, according to the Information Ministry. Sheikhli is a chief spokesman for the Baghdad security plan, in charge of building public support for government efforts to quell violence in the city.

As fighting continued in Basra, saboteurs blew up one of the city's main oil pipelines. Gunmen opened fire on the city's police chief, wounding him and killing three of his bodyguards.

Maj. Gen. Abdul Aziz Mohammad, director of military operations at Iraq's Defense Ministry, said the Basra operation would continue until security forces captured the outlaws or wiped them out. He said the Iraqi military planned to seal and search every neighborhood to capture suspected criminals and confiscate weapons.

But an adviser to Iraqi security forces, who had predicted that the fight in Basra would take 10 days, said it could go on much longer. He also said Iraqi forces were calling on U.S. and British forces for help. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he said he was not authorized to speak with reporters.

"I think the government can't win this battle without interference of Americans or British," he said. "I think the aid or assistance is on the way." In his view, the Iraqi military needed air coverage and help with logistics and intelligence.

The fighters "are opening many, many fronts against the army," he said. The adviser said the militia's weapons, some of them made in Iran, are more powerful than those of the Iraqi army.

So far, casualties in Basra on all sides have totaled about 400 killed and 300 wounded, he said.

Maj. Tom Holloway, a British military spokesman, said Iraqi security forces were "consolidating their current positions" and preparing for the next stage of the offensive. They were cordoning off areas and trying to gain control of the city "bite-size chunk by bite-size chunk."

Residents in Basra said they observed Mahdi Army militiamen gathering in their neighborhood stronghold of Jumhuriyah, assembling men and weapons while dodging gunfire from Iraqi army snipers at intersections.
Posted by Fred 2008-03-28 13:57|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top
 File under: Mahdi Army 

#1 It's a question, he said, of "who's got the best conspiracy" theory about why Maliki decided to act now.

Give the guy a little credit. He's smart enough to do it before the election so he doesn't risk having a donk in the White House when he's fighting Sadr. He's probably also smart enough to know that sooner or later he would have to fight Sadr.
Posted by Abu Uluque (aka Ebbang Uluque6305) 2008-03-28 14:25||   2008-03-28 14:25|| Front Page Top

#2 "If there were no Americans, there would be no fighting," said Jack Murtha Abu Mustafa al-Thahabi, a senior Democrat Party Mahdi Army member.


Straight out of the Democrat Party "Cut-N-Run" phrasebook. And the press is carrying the water for them. Bastards.
Posted by OldSpook 2008-03-28 14:32||   2008-03-28 14:32|| Front Page Top

#3 "If there were no Americans, there would be no fighting," said Jack Murtha Abu Mustafa al-Thahabi, a senior Democrat Party Mahdi Army member.


Straight out of the Democrat Party "Cut-N-Run" phrasebook. And the press is carrying the water for them. Bastards.
Posted by OldSpook 2008-03-28 14:34||   2008-03-28 14:34|| Front Page Top

#4 And thank you (NOT!) to the British asshats that left us with that terrible situation in Basra, who had their troops there but didn't allow them to fully engage all the enemies.

More failed accommodationist strategy from Euros.

When will they learn appeasement doesn't work?

Failed in pre-WW2 germany, Failed with the Soviet Union (only confrontation worked), Failed in Bosnia and Kosovo. Faield in Iraq in 90. Failed in Afghanistan, Failed in Basra Iraq.

And when will we learn not to listen to them?
Posted by OldSpook 2008-03-28 14:41||   2008-03-28 14:41|| Front Page Top

#5 "If there were no Americans, there would be no fighting," said Abu Mustafa al-Thahabi, 38, a senior Mahdi Army member.

It doesn't matter from which perspective you cut the cake, this guy is exactly right. Too bad for his perspective that means he doesn't get to run around with an AK-47 in hand and order people to do what his mullah thinks they should be doing.

I for one am glad this is happening. I think these a-holes are the last meaningful Islamic Bomb that Anti-Iraqi Forces can hold over everyone's heads. They seem to me to be an extensive network of safehouses and moral support. Rip them up by the root and the rest will fade away. Hopefully quickly.

I sort of wonder if Maliki said it was going to be an Iraqi-only operation in part just to get the bad guys to stay put for once, hoping that he might actually be able to pull it off using Iraqi forces only. They probably would have bailed if they heard the full Coalition was coming. In any case, they are going to learn a lot from this one.
Posted by gorb 2008-03-28 14:51||   2008-03-28 14:51|| Front Page Top

#6 "If there were no Americans, there would be no fighting,"

BULLSHIT you've been killing each other for a thousand years now, only the name of the current enemy changes.

It's a wonder the place is not an uninhabited desert by now.
Posted by Redneck Jim">Redneck Jim  2008-03-28 14:56||   2008-03-28 14:56|| Front Page Top

#7 If there were no Americans, Saddam would probably still be in charge.
Posted by Rambler in California">Rambler in California  2008-03-28 15:00||   2008-03-28 15:00|| Front Page Top

#8 If there were no Americans, they would still be a British colony and riding only camels.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2008-03-28 15:07||   2008-03-28 15:07|| Front Page Top

#9 The clashes suggested that American forces were being drawn more deeply into a broad offensive that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, launched in the southern city of Basra on Tuesday, saying death squads, criminal gangs and rogue militias were the targets.

OK - as a former English major and sometimes teacher, go ahead and try to parse that sentence - diagram it as taught in elementary school - verbs, nouns, subject, predicate and so on. It's difficult, but not impossible.

That's the first hint the writer is confused, ignorant or both.

Now try the easier analytical tool for WAPO, NYT, etc.. Assume it's either completely wrong, or intentionally misleading.

With that tool, I read this to mean US forces are acting as planned, in concert with Iraqi Govt. forces, in limited areas, using elements of surprise and overwhelming firepower to gain immediate tactical advantage within a carefully crafted strategy.

The two attributed quotes from US and British military spokesman affirm this, amidst the cloud of misleading adjectival speculation of typical MSM combat reporting.

I'll pay attention when they report from the scene, with accompanying video.
Posted by Punky Clelet7200 2008-03-28 15:08||   2008-03-28 15:08|| Front Page Top

#10 BBC reports from Basra indicate improving situation there.
Posted by liberalhawk 2008-03-28 16:05||   2008-03-28 16:05|| Front Page Top

#11 yeah anyone remember the Persian empire or ottoman empire i bet they where won with the help of the americans athat caused that killing sprree too
Posted by sinse 2008-03-28 16:09||   2008-03-28 16:09|| Front Page Top

#12 and has anyone heard from sadr in the last few days?
sorry i'mj a lil behind
Posted by sinse 2008-03-28 16:10||   2008-03-28 16:10|| Front Page Top

#13 Does this sound like Armagedan to anyone besides me? Fortunately, we seem to be on the winning side. I haven't seen one word lately about AQ Iraq and the bad old Sunni's. This is all Iran and Shiite militias. Progress is a wonderful thing.
Posted by Titus Cloling7944 2008-03-28 16:19||   2008-03-28 16:19|| Front Page Top

#14 Are those on-air reports, liberalhawk, because the current version of the BBC's article on the situation sounds pretty damned bleak. Lots of "Maliki blinked first" water-carrying going on there, and Paul Wood sounds like he's practically pissing himself.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2008-03-28 16:37|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2008-03-28 16:37|| Front Page Top

#15 I'd bet a large nachos with cheese and jalapenos that these stories have been written within the last couple months, waiting for something to happen and fill in the name blanks - sitting at the climate controlled bar with a G&T with ice, twiddling a pencil and trying to come up with 2 or 3 sensational stories before they happen.
It's a question, he said, of "who's got the best conspiracy" theory about why Maliki decided to act now.
"Oh, the consensus is Walter's, he is over at the dart board playing cricket if you would like to talk to him."
Posted by swksvolFF 2008-03-28 16:49||   2008-03-28 16:49|| Front Page Top

#16 Are you suggesting that they write these stories ahead of time when and cut and paste them together to save time when they have more important "functions" to attend?
Posted by gorb 2008-03-28 17:28||   2008-03-28 17:28|| Front Page Top

#17 Soft power and soft journalism, nothing to see here except for Sadr's mooks getting their a$$ handed to them.
"It's a question, he said, of "who's got the best conspiracy" theory about why Maliki decided to act now." Seems it started with the other side....must be a soft thinking administration unnamed source at the WaPo.
Posted by Muggsy Gling 2008-03-28 18:03||   2008-03-28 18:03|| Front Page Top

#18 i don't think there is a winning side during armageddon
Posted by sinse 2008-03-28 18:26||   2008-03-28 18:26|| Front Page Top

#19 There is, sinse, you need to re-read the BoR.
Posted by twobyfour 2008-03-28 18:36||   2008-03-28 18:36|| Front Page Top

#20 Strykers have killed at least 9 3/26 and 3/27.

Some big kill counts. Battles are almost exclusive to New Baghdad, Sadr City and Kadamiyah.
Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins  2008-03-28 19:43|| http://northshorejournal.org]">[http://northshorejournal.org]  2008-03-28 19:43|| Front Page Top

13:10 Glenmore
13:03 Glenmore
13:03 Mullah Richard
13:01 Abu Uluque
12:57 Abu Uluque
12:46 M. Murcek
12:40 Frank G
12:39 Procopius2k
12:36 Procopius2k
12:35 bman911
12:33 M. Murcek
12:31 M. Murcek
12:29 M. Murcek
12:29 Grom the Reflective
12:28 MikeKozlowski
12:24 trailing wife
12:24 MikeKozlowski
12:23 trailing wife
12:09 M. Murcek
12:08 trailing wife
12:05 M. Murcek
12:04 M. Murcek
12:04 Abu Uluque
12:02 Abu Uluque









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com