Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2006-12-09 Home Front: Culture Wars
San Francisco Fights Over Its Character
SAN FRANCISCO Dec 8, 2006 (AP)— An effort to clean up some of the city's seedier neighborhoods and rid the streets of junkies, hookers and runaways has run headlong into San Francisco's free-to-be-who-you-are ethos.

Nearly four decades after the Summer of Love, residents and merchants frustrated with what they regard as blight are turning to the city for help or taking revitalization into their own hands.
I can't imagine why.
But other residents of the Tenderloin district and Haight-Ashbury contend a crackdown would rob their neighborhoods of their identity and violate everything San Francisco stands for.

Continued from Page 5



Joey Cain, a board member of the Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council, complained that those who would drive the vagrants from the neighborhood are turning their backs on the Haight's "historic obligation" to shelter the downtrodden.

This is, after all, the city that proved so appealing to the Beats, the hippies and practically every other brand of noncomformist.

Haight-Ashbury was the very capital of the Summer of Love in 1967, when young people flocked for the music, sexual freedom and drug culture. They are still coming, panhandling on corners and sleeping under the trees in nearby Golden Gate Park.

But the neighborhood has changed. Its stately Victorian homes sell for millions, and the head shops are mixed with chain stores and trendy cafes. Business owners and longtime residents complaint that street kids harass the elderly and leave playgrounds littered with needles. "There is definitely a tension in the neighborhood between the people who live here and the scene on the street," said Gary Frank, owner of Haight Street's Booksmith shop since 1976.
When you have something, you have something to lose.
Earlier this year, the city decided to enforce an ordinance that makes overnight camping in Golden Gate Park a misdemeanor. It gave 200 homeless people time to remove their belongings; they were paired with social workers who advised them on how to find housing. Those who had someone back home to care for them were given a one-way ticket.

But an online neighborhood message board was soon filled with diatribes accusing the city of pandering to well-to-do residents and abandoning its principles. Cain, the Haight-Ashbury community leader, said those who want to drive the homeless out are simply trying to keep real estate prices high.

Elected officials in San Francisco know they must tread lightly to avoid offending people's ultraliberal sensibilities. "If that behavior is negatively impacting a neighborhood, we are going to deal with it," said Trent Rhorer, the city's head of human services, "but deal with it sensitively and responsibly in a way that gets people in real services instead of simply fining them, citing them and putting them in jail."
Once we figure out who actually votes, we'll know what to do.
Other parts of the Bay Area are feeling similar tensions. In Berkeley's People's Park, site of historic 1960s protests, the University of California has proposed eliminating the grassy hills where the homeless have long congregated. Critics complain the plan would destroy what makes the park special.

In the Tenderloin district, San Francisco's seediest quarter with its flophouses, strip clubs and sex shops, a community group wanted to plant hundreds of trees and enlisted an organization that helps homeless young people to do the work.

But the beautification project angered some gay and transgender residents.

Pamphlets were handed out deriding the proposal, and a picture of the community group's chairwoman, Carolynn Abst, was featured on "Wanted" posters accusing her of heading a "brutal gentrification squad."

Those who want to preserve the grittiness of the Tenderloin point with disgust at San Francisco's Mission District, where in the late 1990s the working-class, mostly Hispanic residents were pushed out by rich dot-com employees.

Abst said opposition to the tree-planting effort was driven by a small group of gay activists. She said she was stunned by the personal attack over what she saw as a good-faith cleanup effort.

San Francisco's image as a city that accepts all comers "is everybody's initial good idea," Abst said. "But over time it wears thin. There is always a new wash of people coming here for the first time and you are cleaning up their bathroom habits."

Despite creeping gentrification, San Francisco continues to draw transients, like the young people in tattered black sweatshirts who sat on a street corner in the Haight with leashed pit bulls recently, asking for change.

"You can get around by the kindness of people's hearts," said Jaclyn, a 25-year-old who would only give her first name.
Posted by .com 2006-12-09 00:23|| || Front Page|| [11141 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Aw, come on, just when I've convinced al Qaeda to set off their dirty bombs in the city by the bay.
Posted by wxjames 2006-12-09 00:43||   2006-12-09 00:43|| Front Page Top

#2 Joey Cain ... complained that those who would drive the vagrants from the neighborhood are turning their backs on the Haight's "historic obligation" to shelter the downtrodden.

Perhaps Joey and his kind could take them under their wing and offer them a room in their house to live in. For free.

Build them a shelter. If that isn't enough, change the laws to get them help for whatever mental condition they have that makes them think living out in the elements and the constant fear of getting shanked is better than working 8-5 to pay for shelter, getting healthcare benefits, and having a computer with a high-speed internet connection.
Posted by gorb 2006-12-09 00:56||   2006-12-09 00:56|| Front Page Top

#3 I knew if I left this story in the hopper .com would jump all over it ...
Posted by Steve White">Steve White  2006-12-09 01:32||   2006-12-09 01:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Elected officials in San Francisco know they must tread lightly to avoid offending people's ultraliberal sensibilities.

So, I suppose they would tread equally lightly to avoid offending ultraconservative sensibilities? Hello, hypocrisy?
Posted by gromky 2006-12-09 05:25||   2006-12-09 05:25|| Front Page Top

#5 Only an Ultra Right Wing Conservative would object to street people defecating outside their ice cream shop don't ya know.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2006-12-09 08:32||   2006-12-09 08:32|| Front Page Top

#6 Only an Ultra Right Wing Conservative would object to street people defecating outside their ice cream shop don't ya know.

and the state health inspector.

On a side note, recalling that SF is a sanctuary city, why does anyone have a door on their house or apartment? I mean, if you really support he notion of open borders and an open society, you should demonstrate that by open portals [formerly known as doors] on all buildings. That should end the sight of people living on and urinating in the street. Issue solved.
Posted by Procopius2k 2006-12-09 08:56||   2006-12-09 08:56|| Front Page Top

#7 In hollyweed at a dinner party just before the first election of the Governator I met a leftist lady who supported him. I asks why... "Because he might get the bums who piss on my front wall off the street!"

So hollyweed get's that much. What the hell is wrong with SanFran?
Posted by 3dc 2006-12-09 09:43||   2006-12-09 09:43|| Front Page Top

#8 San Francisco has completely mainstream values. At least that's what Nancy Pelosi and the MSM keep telling us.
Posted by DMFD 2006-12-09 18:04||   2006-12-09 18:04|| Front Page Top

#9 When the Big One happens, I hope it swallows that place whole...
Posted by tu3031 2006-12-09 18:23||   2006-12-09 18:23|| Front Page Top

#10 I'm from San Jose, but spent years working in San Francisco. By far the most beautiful large city in the U.S., and the most quirky. I've given my contributions to that as well, and have slept in Golden Gate park after getting stoned off my rocker a few times. Enough is enough though. Most San Franciscans aren't like the extremists you see on the news all the time. The extremists are the loudest though. I guess, kind of like how it is with Muslims. Don't know. If they clean it up, kudos to them!
Posted by Thoth 2006-12-09 19:19||   2006-12-09 19:19|| Front Page Top

#11 I knew if I left this story in the hopper .com would jump all over it ...

Like so much uncovered meat.

By far the most beautiful large city in the U.S.

An easy case to argue, especially since it routinely places among the top ten tourist destinations in the entire world. It is also restaurant heaven. Northern California has three of the top thirteen finest restaurants in the entire world, all within driving distance of SF. While the antics of its politicians leave much to be desired, the scenic beauty and quality of life in the Bay Area is unbeatable. It is one of the world's largest and safest natural harbors. The view from Mount Diablo is rivaled only by Mount Kilamanjaro (and better than Everest). The Central Valley supplies 50% of the produce consumed in the USA. Silicon Valley remains the technological engine of the entire world and California's economy usually places among the world's top ten nations.

We must be doing something right. Why else would so many people want to live here?
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2006-12-09 19:39||   2006-12-09 19:39|| Front Page Top

#12 Howdy, Thoth! Sen de a note when you get a chance. I lived and worked in San Francisco in 1982 for a short time. I liked it OK. I lived and worked in Portland, Oregon in 1990. I LOVED it. Have to disagree with ya Thoth, Portland is the most beautiful large city in the US>
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2006-12-09 19:40||   2006-12-09 19:40|| Front Page Top

#13 Worked and lived in downtown SF for 15 years. I hate the place with a passion. While there are many nice parts, mostly it's an open gutter of a city. A couple of districts like Bernal Heights and the Marina hardly makeup for all of the districts like Hunters Point, The Mission, the Tenderloin, the Lower Haight; I could go on. The sheer volume of drunks, drug addicts, and vagrants in SF is nothing short of staggering. They're, what, 20% of the population.
Posted by Secret Master 2006-12-09 20:16||   2006-12-09 20:16|| Front Page Top

#14 Never been to Portland DB. Couldn't say on that one.
Posted by Thoth 2006-12-09 20:38||   2006-12-09 20:38|| Front Page Top

#15 I'm still ROFLMAO over the term "Tenderloin District". Completely sums up my (red-state, southern) impression of the looniest city in the US, lol!
Posted by BA 2006-12-09 21:50||   2006-12-09 21:50|| Front Page Top

#16 The Tenderloin looks a lot like the Bowrey in NYC.
Posted by Thoth 2006-12-09 22:42||   2006-12-09 22:42|| Front Page Top

03:23 Besoeker
02:05 Grom the Affective
02:04 Grom the Affective
01:26 49 Pan
00:22 EMS Artifact
00:16 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com