Article

2006-01-25 Afghanistan

THOUSANDS of British combat troops are expected to be sent to one of the most dangerous parts of Afghanistan. John Reid, the Defence Secretary, is said to be ready to announce that 4,000 soldiers from 16 Air Assault Brigade, built around the 3rd Battalion, the Parachute Regiment, will be sent to the Helmand province to help with its reconstruction. There are about 1,000 British troops in Afghanistan now. The influx will be cut to 3,500 when engineers complete camp building.

Officially the role of the new troops will be to help the Afghan Government with provincial reconstruction, but ministers expect that they may be deployed against al-Qaeda groups and drug barons.

Apache helicopter gunships and Merlin and Chinook helicopters will accompany them, along with Harrier jets. The decision to send the Parachute Regiment underlines the risks of the mission. They will take over from US forces and lead a new Nato force.

Soldiers are now training on Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, and learning about Afghanistan and its culture. Mr Reid will visit them before they embark.

Ministers have said that the rise in suicide bombings in Afghanistan is of great concern. Al-Qaeda forces have killed 100 US soldiers and thousands of civilians, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawis al-Qaeda group in Iraq is believed to have set up a new insurgency unit in southern Afghanistan.

The escalation in suicide attacks has raised alarm within Nato, which believes that the Taleban and its supporters are targeting southern Afghanistan because of the alliances plan to move into the region by spring, increasing the number of international troops in the country from 10,000 to 16,000.

Since the new year there has been a spate of suicide attacks, with one bomber killing at least 20 people in Spin Buldak on January 16. Another bomber killed three in Kandahar, including a Canadian diplomat, a day before.

There has been growing concern among member countries, particularly in the Netherlands, over extra troops. MPs on the Commons Defence Select Committee aired misgivings last week about sending British troops to Helmand, home to opium barons and one of the most dangerous areas of Afghanistan. The Paras will be expected to launch operations against them.

Posted by Dan Darling 2006-01-25 01:00|| || Front Page|| [11136 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Our Military other Gov assets met the very tough challenges presented in Afganistan and have done a great job [under reported]. You would think the true story would be so compelling that the MSM would cover it from A_Z.

enter the UK troops..is this the best the Timesonline can do?

sent to one of the most dangerous parts of Afghanistan

rise in suicide bombings in Afghanistan is of great concern.

Al-Qaeda forces have killed 100 US soldiers and thousands of civilians

Abu Musab al-Zarqawis al-Qaeda group in Iraq is believed to have set up a new insurgency unit in southern Afghanistan.

The escalation in suicide attacks has raised alarm within Nato

the Taleban and its supporters are targeting southern Afghanistan

Since the new year there has been a spate of suicide attacks

one bomber killing at least 20 people in Spin Buldak on January 16.

Another bomber killed three in Kandahar, including a Canadian diplomat, a day before.

There has been growing concern among member countries, particularly in the Netherlands, over extra troops. MPs on the Commons Defence Select Committee aired misgivings last week about sending British troops to Helmand, home to opium barons and one of the most dangerous areas of Afghanistan.

Not one sentence about the mission helping Afghanistan or helping the Afghani people establish a government and society free from War Lords and Muslim fanatics. Not one word about health services, clean water supplies, schools etc. that will result directly from UK soldiers being there.

Posted by RD 2006-01-25 02:46|| 2006-01-25 02:46|| Front Page Top

#2 Thank you Poms. Go GET'em!

Posted by Besoeker 2006-01-25 08:49|| 2006-01-25 08:49|| Front Page Top

#3 RD, well said. You think at some point the NYT stock holders would get the connection between that 41% drop and their refusal to accurately report the news.

Posted by 2b 2006-01-25 10:37|| 2006-01-25 10:37|| Front Page Top

#4 The BBC is wringing it's hands over this.

Posted by Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-25 19:55|| 2006-01-25 19:55|| Front Page Top

09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker
07:03 NN2N1
06:58 NN2N1
06:58 Besoeker