Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024 View Fri 04/19/2024
2005-09-13 Home Front: Tech
Soldier Demands Spur Development of New Gear
September 13, 2005: Here’s another example of wartime needs speeding up the development of new equipment. It also shows how a lot more military equipment innovation is coming bottom-up, instead of top-down. The Special Forces have been doing their own thing for decades, but now divisions and brigades run their own little R&D operations. An example of how this works is ROVER (Remote Operations Video Enhanced Receiver). This device uses a satellite data link to get the video from overhead UAVs or aircraft. A Special Forces soldier, just back from Afghanistan, walked into the Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in January 2002, and asked the technical people why his guys could not have a device that would allow them to watch the video being generated by a Predator, AC-130 or other aircraft overhead. Since it was the Special Forces troops on the ground who were running, and fighting, the ground battle, it would help them a lot if they could see the real time video from above. At that time, the video was being viewed by people in the aircraft, or the UAV operators (who often were back in the United States, running things via a satellite link.) The ground troops had to ask the air force what could be seen on the video, and there was usually a delay in getting that information. It would be much better for all concerned if the ground troops could see that video in real time.

The air force people went to work, and in two weeks had a ROVER prototype that Special Forces personnel could take back to Afghanistan. ROVER I was not terribly portable, but the Special Forces could haul it around in a hummer, and see what any Predators overhead were seeing. This proved very useful. A few months later, ROVER II appeared, which allowed troops to view UAV vids on a laptop computer. Last Fall, Rover III, a 12 pound unit built to be carried in a backpack, was put into service. Although ROVER IIIs cost $60,000 each, they address dozens of suggestions and complaints from the troops who used earlier ROVERs. Some 260 are on order, and 700 are expected to be in service by next June. They are being used in Afghanistan and Iraq, and can grab video feeds from army, marine and air force UAVs and bomber targeting pods (which have great resolution, even when the aircraft are 20,000 feet up.)

The Rover IV appears next year. It will allow the users to point and click on targets to be hit. With ROVER III, the guys on the ground can see what they want bombed, or hit with a missile, but have to talk the bombers to it. This happens often, especially when the target is behind a hill or buildings, preventing the ground troops from using their laser range finders to get a GPS location. With ROVER IV, the bomber pilot, or UAV operator, will be looking at the same video as the ground troops, and can confirm that the indicated target is what is to be hit. This is particularly important in urban warfare, where the building next door might be full of innocent civilians.

The ROVER gear is operated by air force ground controllers, but the army is eager to get even smaller and lighter units into the hands of platoon and patrol leaders. Because it’s wartime, there’s not much to stop this from happening. And happening in the next year or so. Without the wartime pressure, it would have taken a decade or more to get ROVER to where it is in only three years.
Posted by Steve 2005-09-13 09:37|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 They are being used in Afghanistan and Iraq, and can grab video feeds from army, marine and air force UAVs and bomber targeting pods

I sincerely hope it also includes a half-pound of C-4 so it can be remotely destroyed if lost or captured.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2005-09-13 10:17||   2005-09-13 10:17|| Front Page Top

#2 Why can't border patrol use them? After 9-1-1, as an experiment,law enforcement and the media went to the remote mountainous area of our northern border and monitored how many came across on little used paths from Canada and were quite surprised at the regular smuggling. I bet they would be useful to those on the ground in a terrorist attack, too.
Posted by Danielle 2005-09-13 10:54||   2005-09-13 10:54|| Front Page Top

#3 I love to see bottom-up procurement like this. The fact of the matter is that we have highly intelligent soldiers, many of whom are "cross-trained" and experienced both in science and technology, and military science and military technology.

If not hindered with either a tight purse from above or inter- and intra-service rivalries, these personnel will develop extraordinary innovations and in record time.

Their great limitation is fabrication. That is, unless these soldiers could direct civilian expert engineers to fabricate larger and more complex systems, those systems will remain top-down. That is why it is unlikely that even a special forces division will ever get a vehicle truly tailored to their wants and needs.

While organizations like DARPA and ONR can somewhat act as a bridge, this fabrication issue is still a major dilemma that needs to be resolved in the future.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-09-13 11:15||   2005-09-13 11:15|| Front Page Top

#4 They should rename this the ROVE, watch the moonbats blow a couple of gaskets...
Posted by Raj 2005-09-13 17:38||   2005-09-13 17:38|| Front Page Top

08:45 Procopius2k
08:42 Skidmark
08:41 Galactic+Coordinator+and+Company6935
08:38 Skidmark
08:31 Skidmark
08:29 Jack+Creanter7508
08:26 Jack+Creanter7508
08:25 Skidmark
08:20 Jack+Creanter7508
08:19 Jack+Creanter7508
08:16 Xyz
08:12 Skidmark
08:10 Besoeker
08:07 trailing wife
08:06 Besoeker
08:03 Skidmark
08:03 Besoeker
07:59 Cesare
07:59 Skidmark
07:56 trailing wife
07:56 Besoeker
07:47 Super Hose
07:47 Xyz
07:45 Mullah Richard









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com