Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 05/10/2003 View Fri 05/09/2003 View Thu 05/08/2003 View Wed 05/07/2003 View Tue 05/06/2003 View Mon 05/05/2003 View Sun 05/04/2003
1
2003-05-10 Terror Networks
Brajesh Mishra moots India-US-Israel anti-terror axis
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2003-05-10 02:45 pm|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Do you really see the US entering into an alliance that would naturally stand in opposition to Pakistan?

Remember that Pakistan is one of the *US-friendly* WMD-wielding, terrorist-supporting, expansionistic, tyrannical regimes.

As such I say that the chances for America to join an actual such coalition are about as many as France joining the coalition against Saddam Hussein...
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-05-10 15:34:32||   2003-05-10 15:34:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Aris,
You make a very good point. India and Israel already have pretty much anti-terror alliance although they don't publicise it very much. There are some reports that when India did their nuclear testing in 1998, one of the tests was actually an Israeli bomb (though I'm not sure how reliable this is). During the Kargil war Israel provided lots of supplies and Intelligence to India.
The US on the other hand has not been so eager. Immediately after 9-11, India provided the US with all the Intel they had on the Taliban and used their links with the Northern Alliance. US provided India with absolutely no intel on the Jihadis that they had. During operation Parakram, when a million troops were deployed after the attack on the India Parliament, there is some evidence that the US navy was actually jamming the communication system of the Indian Navy. Considering that their intention was to hit the Jihadi training camps, as far as I am concerned the US navy was defending and protecting a bunch of Jihadi terrorist (though I have to stress I have only read this an India defence Forum and not in any news media. If it is true, I doubt that the Indian Navy would be willing to admit it openly).
So as you can see, I am a bit sceptical of this alliance.
Posted by rg117 2003-05-10 15:56:54||   2003-05-10 15:56:54|| Front Page Top

#3 Pakistan is a temporary ally of convenience, nothing more. Certainly not truly friendly, and certainly no more of an ally than India. No one in the US believes Pakistan to be a real ally.

The US has always viewed the disagreements between India and Pakistan as very nasty irritants that prevent us from truly being close to either country. We've had the same sorts of problems between Greece and Turkey, of course. Pakistan was much less in favor until the US had to make an ultimatum.

The US is unlikely to become a truly strong ally of India merely because India would require that the US completely acknowledge and agree with India's position on Kashmir, something I don't see happening.
Posted by John Thacker  2003-05-10 16:30:48||   2003-05-10 16:30:48|| Front Page Top

#4 In general, of course, I would very much prefer for the US to have an alliance with India. Sadly, realpolitick required a bit of Pakistan's cooperation, not that anyone trusts the bastards.
Posted by John Thacker  2003-05-10 16:32:16||   2003-05-10 16:32:16|| Front Page Top

10:21 Anonymous
17:02 Scott
07:26 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
07:01 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
06:51 Watcher
06:51 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
04:28 R. McLeod
04:19 Bulldog
04:02 R. McLeod
03:47 R. McLeod
03:42 R. McLeod
03:07 Russell
01:14 Scott
00:43 Scott
23:53 Anonymous Troll
23:52 Don
23:51 mojo
22:29 Frank G
22:05 Frank G
20:12 john
19:05 mojo
18:57 mojo
18:52 mojo
18:40 Richard Aubrey









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com