Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 05/27/2017 View Fri 05/26/2017 View Thu 05/25/2017 View Wed 05/24/2017 View Tue 05/23/2017 View Mon 05/22/2017 View Sun 05/21/2017
1
2017-05-27 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
GD: Accused of underpaying women, Google says it's too expensive to get wage data
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-05-27 01:07|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 After all, they're only Google. How could they possibly be expected to figure that kind of thing out?

Either way, without the data, how could anyone know that these women were being underpaid? And if Google couldn't figure it out, then who could? Or is someone just fishing for notoriety or dollars?
Posted by gorb 2017-05-27 13:09||   2017-05-27 13:09|| Front Page Top

#2 They can just Google the data...
Posted by Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-05-27 14:20||   2017-05-27 14:20|| Front Page Top

#3 Google doesn't use a payroll system? Who knew??
Posted by CrazyFool 2017-05-27 14:57||   2017-05-27 14:57|| Front Page Top

#4 Google is in the mid peninsula of the SF Bay Area. Therefore there's more than just two sexes to parse. You need lawyers to do that, and lots of liberal arts professors as expert witnesses. And them bastards are expensive.
Posted by Penguin of the Desert 2017-05-27 15:21||   2017-05-27 15:21|| Front Page Top

22:50 Skidmark
22:48 Skidmark
22:48 CrazyFool
22:46 Pappy
22:44 Skidmark
22:40 Skidmark
22:16 gorb
21:20 james
21:06 swksvolFF
21:05 borgboy
21:01 trailing wife
21:01 borgboy
20:59 borgboy
20:56 Rambler in Virginia
20:56 swksvolFF
20:38 Frank G
20:17 trailing wife
20:14 Glenmore
20:06 Nero White 3083
20:03 trailing wife
20:01 Nero White 3083
19:53 Zenobia Floger6220
19:51 CrazyFool
19:39 Glirt Elmeregum1291









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com