Article

2016-08-23 -Lurid Crime Tales-

Election Lawyer Blasts ‘Lunacy’ of MSNBC Denying Voter Fraud

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2016-08-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 It beyond their comprehension to understand that allowing unqualified voters to vote actually suppresses the legitimate vote of qualified voters. If you truly value something, you protect it.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-08-23 08:31|| 2016-08-23 08:31|| Front Page Top

#2 No, they comprehend all too well. You see, these ineligible voters all vote in their favor, so it's all good. You can be assured that if a majority of the ineligible voters were voting Republican they would be all up in arms for Voter ID.

Posted by Spinesing Gray3122 2016-08-23 09:09|| 2016-08-23 09:09|| Front Page Top

#3 If vote fraud is small then it won't affect the election if you check will it?

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2016-08-23 12:17|| 2016-08-23 12:17|| Front Page Top

#4 #2 has it right. It's all about political expediency and has absolutely nothing to do with principles whatsoever. It rarely does with the Democrats, if at all.

Posted by Eltoroverde 2016-08-23 12:18|| 2016-08-23 12:18|| Front Page Top

#5 I've had a number of debates with liberals on line. They inevitably claim that voter fraud is nonsense. Then I post a link to the felon voters that put Al Franken in his Senate Seat, the one vote that allowed Obamacare to go through on a party line vote. Hot and heavy debaters seem to fade away at that point. It's not the number of illegal votes so much as the careful placement.

Posted by rjschwarz 2016-08-23 14:09|| 2016-08-23 14:09|| Front Page Top

#6 And a 102% voter turnout is a bit too obvious.

We had an election out here - rural Kansas, hotly contested issue with lasting ramifications, numerous loud town hall meetings, literally takes five minutes to vote, advanced voting available.

Turnout was something like 35% of eligible voters.

The State of Kansas is in court right now to defend its voter ID law. Something like 50,000 illegally/contested registered voters. They may not yet put a democrat in the US Senate, but can make the difference at State and below.

Posted by swksvolFF 2016-08-23 16:10|| 2016-08-23 16:10|| Front Page Top

22:42 Procopius2k
22:37 Bov Flimbers
22:03 Nguard
21:20 swksvolFF
20:46 European Conservative
20:06 Blossom Unains5562
19:52 Pappy
19:25 swksvolFF
19:14 Procopius2k
19:10 Procopius2k
17:53 swksvolFF
17:52 JohnQC
17:51 JohnQC
17:40 Besoeker
17:39 Frank G
17:33 European Conservative
17:32 JohnQC
17:15 JohnQC
16:50 swksvolFF
16:44 swksvolFF
16:10 swksvolFF
16:01 Skidmark
16:00 Skidmark
15:49 swksvolFF