Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 02/01/2013 View Thu 01/31/2013 View Wed 01/30/2013 View Tue 01/29/2013 View Mon 01/28/2013 View Sun 01/27/2013 View Sat 01/26/2013
1
2013-02-01 Home Front: WoT
The case for torture.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anginelet Angager2639 2013-02-01 07:24|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [270 views ]  Top

#1 I have that feeling of being tortured for the last four years and anticipate it for the next four years--may 16.
Posted by JohnQC 2013-02-01 10:49||   2013-02-01 10:49|| Front Page Top

#2 From the Slate (!) article:

"12. If you refuse to exploit prisoners, you┬'ll end up killing your enemies instead. All three panelists trashed the Obama-era conceit that we┬'re a better country because we┬'ve scrapped the interrogation program. What we┬'ve really done, they argued, is replace interrogations with drone strikes. ┬"We have made it so legally difficult and so politically dangerous to capture,┬" said Hayden, ┬"that it seems, from the outside looking in, that the default option is to take the terrorists off the battlefield in another sort of way.┬" Rizzo agreed, and he paraphrased The Godfather to suggest that the new policy is bloody and stupid: ┬"You can┬'t kill everybody.┬"*

13. Face the dilemma. The panelists welcomed moral debate about EITs but scorned the delusion that these methods hadn┬'t produced vital information. Candor about the cost of your principles, they argued, is a basic rule of moral health. ┬"We need to be honest with ourselves,┬" said Rodriguez."

Interesting article on a panel discussion including Michael Hayden.
Posted by KBK 2013-02-01 11:42||   2013-02-01 11:42|| Front Page Top

#3 Setting aside moral arguments - which are important IMO. The main practical argument against torture is that it will just make the enemy smarter and more determined - if they know torture is definitely going to happen in captivity ... then they will be sure to kill themselves during their attack or blow themselves up afterwards. i.e. "save the last bullet for yourself". It's dumb to get captured if you know you're facing painful torture. The main practical argument in favor is that it gives interrogators extra leverage - another tool to use. But it's just one tool.

If you read the old books by SAS commandos - back when they occasionally wrote stories about their experiences in Iraq - they will tell you that pain was not their biggest problem in captivity. Their biggest problem was highly skilled interrogators who really knew how to ask hard questions in a repetitive and grueling way. It's a long-term method of applying psychological pressure on prisoners - but very effective. The Chinese are good at it.

Torture is for yard apes. But there are plenty of apes on the planet.
Posted by Raider 2013-02-01 12:33||   2013-02-01 12:33|| Front Page Top

23:32 tu3031
23:26 Alaska Paul
22:40 Beavis
22:33 SteveS
22:26 rammer
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:16 junkiron
21:56 tu3031
21:46 Frank G
21:40 Barbara
21:38 Barbara
21:37 Barbara
21:31 JosephMendiola
21:17 Frank G
21:12 Grunter
21:02 Beavis
20:53 junkiron
20:49 RJ45ACP
20:25 Pappy
20:22 Frank G
20:13  bushman
19:55 Zhang Fei
19:54 gorb
19:51 DepotGuy

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
54.205.211.42


Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com