Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-02-15 00:13||
#2 So? It's a freaking missile sub, what else would be on it?
More idiocy from Reuters, who likely thinks if the sub burned down, the nukes would go off.
Posted by gromky 2012-02-15 01:07||
#3 >More idiocy from Reuters, who likely thinks if the sub burned down, the nukes would go off.
It is a russian sub. I would go anywhere near it.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2012-02-15 09:33||
#4 Interesting that they don't off load their ICBMs before going into drydock for upkeep.
Posted by Penguin 2012-02-15 09:38||
#5 BP, I assume you meant wouldn't go anywhere near it.
Posted by AlanC 2012-02-15 09:49||
#6 Didja hear the one about the Eskimo with the ICBM?
Posted by mojo 2012-02-15 11:05||
#7 Go to your room.
Posted by Pappy 2012-02-15 11:35||
#8 Sounded to me like people were more concerned that if it burned and the explosives from the torpedoes went off, there could have been a lot of fallout from the ICBMs. Aka, dirty bomb.
Posted by DarthVader 2012-02-15 11:55||
#9 Andrei, you've lost another submarine?
Posted by European Conservative 2012-02-15 14:51||
#10 @mojo he slid all the way to the mechanic?
Posted by Kojack 2012-02-15 16:48||
#11 ah yes. wouldn't!
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2012-02-15 17:12||
#12 His assets got frozen?
Posted by swksvolFF 2012-02-15 17:46||
#13 There was a fire. Thing didn't blow up. Sounds positive to me.
Problem with the Russky PAO is getting the story straight, if not truthful. Hate to be a PAO in anybody's military, but especially not theirs.