Article

2010-12-02 Afghanistan

3,200 Taliban killed in Afghanistan in 90 days

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Glenmore 2010-12-02 07:29|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 Go joes!

Posted by Jeremiah Flainter9609 2010-12-02 08:28|| 2010-12-02 08:28|| Front Page Top

#2 Killed the equivalent of an enemy brigade in 90 days.

Among friendly forces, casualties for Sept-Nov 2010 are 180. Averaged out, for that quarter, that is an over 17.7-to-1 kill ratio.

Posted by Anonymoose 2010-12-02 08:38|| 2010-12-02 08:38|| Front Page Top

#3 Is that 180 friendlies killed, or killed and injured?

I suppose the Taliban are either killed outright or they run away uninjured, so there are not so many injured?

Posted by gorb 2010-12-02 10:27|| 2010-12-02 10:27|| Front Page Top

#4 McNab, however, said some commanders were worried that younger, more radical Taliban fighters will take the place of dead leaders. ?

So, how did that work in Iraq? The younger, the less experience, the easier to kill. Just work your way through it. I suspect the' worrying' is being done by those who falsely believe they could 'negotiate' with the older but traditional radical element.

Posted by Procopius2k 2010-12-02 10:42|| 2010-12-02 10:42|| Front Page Top

#5 Seems that Petreaus is getting the job done.

Posted by Ominens tse Tung9155 2010-12-02 10:59|| 2010-12-02 10:59|| Front Page Top

#6 387 top level commanders? That's either a very top heavy organization or a very broad definition of top level.

Is every squad leader in the army a "top level" commander?

Posted by Alan Cramer 2010-12-02 14:15|| 2010-12-02 14:15|| Front Page Top

#7 When any formation larger than a platoon invites a hail of smart bombs on your position, the officer corps tends to flatten radically.

Also, hill-country insurgencies tend by their nature to be somewhat decentralized. "War bands" sounds like a better description than platoons, now that I think about it... it all adds up to a lot of little franchises about as organized as biker gang chapters. Which means a swarm of commanders with less than twenty followers to get their heads blown off trying to go "over the top" in the presence of angry Westerners with superior weaponry.

Posted by Mitch H. 2010-12-02 15:14|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/ 2010-12-02 15:14|| Front Page Top

#8 They are also targeting to maximize high value targets hit, not bodycount.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2010-12-02 15:23|| 2010-12-02 15:23|| Front Page Top

#9 I thought Andy Mcnabb was retired.

Posted by chris 2010-12-02 15:59|| 2010-12-02 15:59|| Front Page Top

#10 Afghanis are tribal, and so many of the "Taliban" commanders are local small time tribal leaders that managed to talk 10-15 of their tribe's hotheads into following them. So a lot of what is happening now is that we are weeding out the local gang leaders for the Afghanis, and letting the uneducated tribal gunnies mill around.

Posted by Shieldwolf 2010-12-02 15:59|| 2010-12-02 15:59|| Front Page Top

#11 "New. World. Record!"
-- Bull Durham

Posted by mojo 2010-12-02 16:02|| 2010-12-02 16:02|| Front Page Top

#12

some commanders were worried that younger, more radical Taliban fighters will take the place of dead leaders.

That same thought occurred to me. When you take out the competent leadership that has risen through the ranks over the years, they are often replaced by less competent, more emotional hotheads. They tend to do more damage in the short term but tend not to live long in that position. Sort of like a final flaring before the flame goes out.

Posted by crosspatch 2010-12-02 16:54|| 2010-12-02 16:54|| Front Page Top

#13 worried that younger, more radical Taliban fighters will take the place of dead leaders

Iin the Pacific turned once the Japanese lost their skilled pilots (and we made ours); WWII in the Atlantic turned once the Germans lost their skilled U-Boat people. I suspect the top 20% are more valuable than the other 80% in any activity that requires skill. Remove the trainers and the trainees have to learn by making all their own mistakes - not an easy thing to survive.

Posted by Glenmore 2010-12-02 19:29|| 2010-12-02 19:29|| Front Page Top

00:02 Broadhead6
23:55 JosephMendiola
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:48 Broadhead6
23:40 Barbara Skolaut
23:24 abu do you love
23:11 Anonymoose
23:07 Uleatch Dribble8106
23:07 Uleatch Dribble8106
22:09 ryuge
21:49 Rambler in Virginia
21:30 retired LEO
21:30 Anonymoose
21:29 Anonymoose
21:29 Frank G
21:21 Frank G
21:17 abu do you love
21:04 tu3031
21:03 lotp
21:00 abu do you love
20:56 abu do you love
20:48 lotp
20:41 abu do you love
20:36 Frank G