Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 02/10/2010 View Tue 02/09/2010 View Mon 02/08/2010 View Sun 02/07/2010 View Sat 02/06/2010 View Fri 02/05/2010 View Thu 02/04/2010
1
2010-02-10 Economy
New Wind Farms in the U.S. Do Not Bring Jobs
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ed 2010-02-10 10:35|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Although wind turbines have a few manufacturers in the midwest, many in use were imported and cannot stand up to the harsh winters in MN. Another problem is even though Pickens' plan has started construction through multiple rural states, there is no grid to connect the power to the cities in need. We need private investment and entrepeneurs to spark construction privately, not relying on the federal subsidies for everything.
Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2010-02-10 11:19||   2010-02-10 11:19|| Front Page Top

#2 Totally agree there LE5091. Its the Field of Dreams Theory.

The problem is private investors tend to be smarter than the high risk-low return proposal, as you stated there are many projects which look great on paper but do not make the real world test. So to create this industry there needed to be a PR campaign to convince taxpayers that a 5% increase in their taxes justifies a 1% (bs numbers but you get the point) decrease in their energy bills. The environmentalists cannot justify it either; I am sure that somebody did a study of how much energy it takes to manufacture the parts, transport them to site, install, and hookup to the grid vs. energy created. Neither side can say with any conviction that these things pay off in a reasonable amount of time.

Its not so different than buying a car, then finding out all you did was buy the transmission because you didn't read the fine print of the contract. And if it is to save the polar bears and such, how much is each polar bear worth now? I agree with Picken's sales pitch that each one of these turbines is less money going to the muddled east, but discounts the numerous other options available to go about that route.
Posted by swksvolFF 2010-02-10 12:08||   2010-02-10 12:08|| Front Page Top

#3 "New Wind Farms in the U.S. Do Not Bring Jobs"

Of course not, silly.

"Nearly $2 billion in money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has been spent on wind power. . . . But the study found that nearly 80 percent of that money has gone to foreign manufacturers of wind turbines"

See, it's done what it was supposed to do - line the pockets of our "leaders'" buddies.

What - you thought these clowns give a rat's ass about jobs for the little people?

Silly you.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2010-02-10 12:47||   2010-02-10 12:47|| Front Page Top

#4 Well somebody's raking in a lotta "green" on them...
Posted by tu3031 2010-02-10 13:01||   2010-02-10 13:01|| Front Page Top

#5 The way to make windpower work is to build the windmills in cities. The germans have done this along the North Sea coast. Well not in cities so much but small towns have a windmill or two that satisfy their power needs. A city would be even better because the buildings tend to channel wind or a turbine could be put atop existing buildings. I imagine San Francisco and Chicago could be taken off the grid fairly easily with all that wind all the time.

Same with solar in the Southwest. Put it on existing buildings, not in some big solar farm that takes up half the desert.

The real problem is people think centralized power becuase they want control and union jobs.
Posted by rjschwarz 2010-02-10 13:39||   2010-02-10 13:39|| Front Page Top

#6 rjschwartz is right although it won't come from wind and solar. It will come from mini-nuke plants and in-home/building natural gas electricity generation. The latter being the most efficient way to distribute electricity and the waste heat can be used for heating.

Otherwise, the green stimulus is just a subsidy to foreign manufacturers. Just like bio-fuels are subsidy to foreign consumers.
Posted by phil_b 2010-02-10 20:26||   2010-02-10 20:26|| Front Page Top

#7 Phil, I agree more or less with everything except the misspelling of my name.
Posted by rjschwarz 2010-02-10 23:35||   2010-02-10 23:35|| Front Page Top

23:45 crosspatch
23:35 rjschwarz
23:32 crosspatch
23:30 rjschwarz
23:27 War On Terror
23:27 eltoroverde
23:10 Don Vito Uleash
22:47 trailing wife
22:42 Whiskey Mike
22:35 Frank G
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:24 trailing wife
22:23 JosephMendiola
22:08 JosephMendiola
22:06 Pappy
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:55 lotp
21:40 badanov
21:30 Bobby
21:15 badanov
21:12 JosephMendiola
21:11 Skunky Glins****
21:10 Frank G
21:09 tipover









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com