Article

2009-12-28 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Slerens Elmolugum9047 2009-12-28 06:46|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 I'll vote for a "No" party. Hell, I would vote for "Let's just meet for one month for one bill then party the rest of the year and leave the voters alone" party at this point.

Posted by DarthVader 2009-12-28 09:31|| 2009-12-28 09:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Great! We need more people in Washington to say "no" to these adolescent Dumbocrats!

Palin/Bachman 2012!

Posted by Parabellum 2009-12-28 10:24|| http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/ 2009-12-28 10:24|| Front Page Top

#3 Well I think this "party of 'no'" attack dog tactic is a great campaign add for the Republicans.

I know that even here in the left coast, everyone with any sanity is up in arms about the health care bill and this cap and trade nonsense. Having the reputation as trying to hold the line against the looney left will have more resonance with voters to the positive than the dems can imagine.

Let's hope the dems continue this rhetoric to remind voters who is fighting for them.

Posted by Karl Rove 2009-12-28 11:11|| 2009-12-28 11:11|| Front Page Top

#4 Not just No, but HELL NO!

2009 Fiscal Year Federal budget deficit: $1420 billion

2010 Projected Fiscal Year Federal budget deficit: $1170 billion. Which is now a fantasy since tax revenue will be much lower. Can you say projected 7% unemployment with a straight face?

2009 Federal debt increase: $2900 billion (bailouts and stealing money from Social Security and Medicare trust funds are "off budget")

2010 Projected Federal debt increase: $1400 billion. Again Marxist Math in action.

Posted by ed 2009-12-28 11:51|| 2009-12-28 11:51|| Front Page Top

#5 Better the party of No than voting for the Demonrats, the party of human sacrifices, criminals, traitors, racists, and anti-human bigots.

My question is, why do we bother negotiating with vermin?

Posted by Silentbrick 2009-12-28 13:23|| 2009-12-28 13:23|| Front Page Top

#6 A "Party of No" attack will play directly into Republican hands because people WANT a "Party of No" at this point. SOMEONE needs to say NO.

Posted by crosspatch 2009-12-28 13:46|| 2009-12-28 13:46|| Front Page Top

00:07 JosephMendiola
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:07 3dc
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
22:11 Procopius2k
22:09 JosephMendiola
22:04 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:01 JosephMendiola
21:58 JosephMendiola
21:56 Alaska Paul
21:53 JosephMendiola
21:52 Alaska Paul
21:51 JosephMendiola
21:49 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:46 JosephMendiola
21:46 Asymmetrical Triangulation
21:44 JosephMendiola
21:37 JosephMendiola
21:34 JosephMendiola