Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/26/2009 View Thu 06/25/2009 View Wed 06/24/2009 View Tue 06/23/2009 View Mon 06/22/2009 View Sun 06/21/2009 View Sat 06/20/2009
1
2009-06-26 China-Japan-Koreas
Nork Cargo Ship 'Approaching Moment of Truth'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2009-06-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 If you are scared of North korea, Obama, you have no business being President.

Treat them like bitches.
Posted by newc">newc  2009-06-26 00:16||   2009-06-26 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 They fire one rocket at US, fire 50 back and make sure you fire for effect.

Tell China it is their problem now, Problem solved. Screw all of this.
Posted by newc">newc  2009-06-26 00:17||   2009-06-26 00:17|| Front Page Top

#3 Empty sea, a sub, late night torp....
Posted by 3dc 2009-06-26 00:19||   2009-06-26 00:19|| Front Page Top

#4 While I share in the sentiments of many that this ship should disappear, I'm afraid there's been too much attention. So the best thing might be to shadow it until it reaches a port and play the political game. We can't offer Vietnam more than the Norks can? Singapore is basically a friend -- time to lean on that friendship a little. About the only place the ship can pull in without being hassled is Burma. Just doing that would be as clear an admission as any as to what the ship is carrying.

We want to play this one smart. The ship is slow, and we have time.
Posted by Steve White 2009-06-26 00:44||   2009-06-26 00:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Hit em soon, early, and often
Posted by GirlThursday 2009-06-26 01:00||   2009-06-26 01:00|| Front Page Top

#6 If not, resistance will from China and other countries will grow and international cooperation in punishing Pyongyang will falter

So effing what? If no obvious lame excuse rears its head in time, they will just make one up. Full steam ahead.
Posted by gorb 2009-06-26 03:35||   2009-06-26 03:35|| Front Page Top

#7 Barry does not like war and our enemies know this!
Posted by paul2 2009-06-26 06:31||   2009-06-26 06:31|| Front Page Top

#8 If the NORKs dump a weapon in a port, wouldn't that tick off the country with the port?
Posted by Lord garth 2009-06-26 09:03||   2009-06-26 09:03|| Front Page Top

#9 The way around this problem needs just a smidgen of creativity. For example, if there were international observers on the bridge of the McCain, from NATO, and suddenly the sonar "detected" a Chinese submarine in the area, imagine the surprise if the Chinese sub mysteriously fired a torpedo at the Nork ship?

All the data "recorded", with all the proper sonar signatures. Of course, it would be immediately classified as Top Secret, the Chinese would be notified, and they wouldn't even know themselves until all their submarines had returned to base and had their torpedoes counted, which would take months.

Meanwhile, all the hubbub would be around "keeping the Chinese attack secret", and putting out some b.s. story about the Nork ship "having an explosion in its cargo hold".

Throw in a few more layers of deception, and seemingly nobody would know what actually happened.
Posted by Anonymoose 2009-06-26 10:01||   2009-06-26 10:01|| Front Page Top

#10 We know what we would do, but what will The One do? Probably not much at all.
Posted by Richard of Oregon 2009-06-26 10:59||   2009-06-26 10:59|| Front Page Top

#11 I suspect it'll be a Vietnamese port. Whether the ship gets checked or not depends on Vietnam being 'convinced' to take action.

Also, it's likely the McCain isn't the only USN vessel one shadowing the Kangam.
Posted by Pappy 2009-06-26 11:30||   2009-06-26 11:30|| Front Page Top

#12 If I was Kimmie - I would have sent this ship plus many others out empty.
Posted by Yosemite Sam 2009-06-26 11:36||   2009-06-26 11:36|| Front Page Top

#13 It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out if a ship is empty or not - it'll ride much higher in the water empty than full. I'm sure it has a cargo on board, it's probably weapons, and it's probably bound for Burma. The question is, is it a bluff, or is Kimmie trying to push some buttons, including a big red one? Remember, Nork only needs to use one nuke on Seoul, and South Korea is a basket case. We could probably nuke the entire surface area of North Korea, and Kimmie would still be breathing air in some shelter, 20 stories below ground level.

At the same time, mining North Korea's harbors wouldn't be a bad idea, and would REALLY put the screws to Kimmie's games.
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2009-06-26 13:14|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2009-06-26 13:14|| Front Page Top

#14 Dolphins. With frickin' LASER BEAMS on their heads!
Posted by mojo 2009-06-26 13:28||   2009-06-26 13:28|| Front Page Top

#15 How odd. I never knew there were icebergs in the China Sea......
Posted by Pliny Chereng2619 2009-06-26 14:16||   2009-06-26 14:16|| Front Page Top

#16 Im thinbking Somali pirates. Dont we have some on ice somewhere?
Posted by BrerRabbit 2009-06-26 14:53||   2009-06-26 14:53|| Front Page Top

#17 It could run into one of those cement subs from Columbia's drug lords and like get a big hole in its hull...

Posted by 3dc 2009-06-26 15:00||   2009-06-26 15:00|| Front Page Top

#18 OTOH, there's also the dangerous "RUSSIA" factor = scenario for Kimmie, espec as per "Big Brother" CHINA???

* ION FREEREPUBLIC > seems NOKOR allegedly may had begun helping BURMA in its own NucTechs Dev + possib procurement of WMDS???

versus

PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUMS > SRI LANKA may desireous of BECOM THE NEW "HONG KONG" OF THE INDIAN OCEAN AFTER ITS ANTI-LTTE WAR???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2009-06-26 19:10||   2009-06-26 19:10|| Front Page Top

#19 What would Burma do with nukes, JosephM? As far as I know they've no external trade to speak of, either legal or illegal, and they don't sponsor external terrorists. Or did I miss something interesting about the Burmese generals?
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2009-06-26 21:55||   2009-06-26 21:55|| Front Page Top

#20 What would Burma do with nukes, JosephM?

Act as a transload point?
Posted by Pappy 2009-06-26 22:13||   2009-06-26 22:13|| Front Page Top

#21 Use them on the Karen peoples to end that civil war.
Posted by 3dc 2009-06-26 22:20||   2009-06-26 22:20|| Front Page Top

#22 The One is still working on his apology speech, and making sure the teleprompter works flawlessly.
Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2009-06-26 23:17||   2009-06-26 23:17|| Front Page Top

23:54 ed
23:48 Anonymoose
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:38 JosephMendiola
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:29 Eric Jablow
23:27 Grunter
23:17 Cornsilk Blondie
23:15 JosephMendiola
22:50 Cornsilk Blondie
22:20 3dc
22:18 Pappy
22:17 Pappy
22:13 Pappy
22:07 trailing wife
21:58 trailing wife
21:55 trailing wife
21:50 European Conservative
21:46 Skunky Glins 5***
21:45 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:42 Broadhead6
21:33 Frank G
21:26 SteveS
21:08 Lumpy Angaith3743









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com